Usefulness of the patient information leaflet (PIL) and information on medicines from professionals: A patients’ view. A qualitative study

Tonka Poplas-Susič, Z. Klemenc-Ketiš, J. Kersnik
{"title":"Usefulness of the patient information leaflet (PIL) and information on medicines from professionals: A patients’ view. A qualitative study","authors":"Tonka Poplas-Susič, Z. Klemenc-Ketiš, J. Kersnik","doi":"10.6016/SLOVMEDJOUR.V83I5.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The Patient information leaflet (PIL) is an important source of information for every patient. Little is known about whether patients read the PIL and whether it contains useful information. Other sources of drug-related information are professionals (a family practitioner, a pharmacist and a nurse). Informing patients on drugs improves their compliance. The aim of the study was to identify the usefulness of PIL from the perspective of the patient, to assess professionals as a source of drug-related information and to suggest changes that can improve informing and therefore patients’ compliances. Methods : Four focus group interviews were conducted across different primary health care centres in the North East of Slovenia. Focus groups were composed of randomly selected patients (in total 20) who were willing to express their views on PILs, on other drug information sources and on possible improvements. A qualitative analysis of the data was based of the transcription of the audiotapes. Results : Patients read the PILs selectively. They were most interested in side effects, contraindications and the purpose of the prescribed drug. Participants reported that the language in PILs is too scientific. In the case they do not understand PILs or they recognise some of the side effects, a majority of participants decide to contact a family physician first, and less frequently a pharmacist or a nurse. A family physician is considered to be the most trustworthy source of information and patients think that pharmacists could play a more active role in patients’ education. Conclusion : Current PILs offer enough partial information to patients but need some improvements in terms of better legibility and access to the most crucial information. PIL does not enable a comprehensive information with respect to patient’s health status. Most reliable source of information is considered to be a family practitioner. Pharmacists could play a more active role in the education of patients.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"368-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/SLOVMEDJOUR.V83I5.1213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background : The Patient information leaflet (PIL) is an important source of information for every patient. Little is known about whether patients read the PIL and whether it contains useful information. Other sources of drug-related information are professionals (a family practitioner, a pharmacist and a nurse). Informing patients on drugs improves their compliance. The aim of the study was to identify the usefulness of PIL from the perspective of the patient, to assess professionals as a source of drug-related information and to suggest changes that can improve informing and therefore patients’ compliances. Methods : Four focus group interviews were conducted across different primary health care centres in the North East of Slovenia. Focus groups were composed of randomly selected patients (in total 20) who were willing to express their views on PILs, on other drug information sources and on possible improvements. A qualitative analysis of the data was based of the transcription of the audiotapes. Results : Patients read the PILs selectively. They were most interested in side effects, contraindications and the purpose of the prescribed drug. Participants reported that the language in PILs is too scientific. In the case they do not understand PILs or they recognise some of the side effects, a majority of participants decide to contact a family physician first, and less frequently a pharmacist or a nurse. A family physician is considered to be the most trustworthy source of information and patients think that pharmacists could play a more active role in patients’ education. Conclusion : Current PILs offer enough partial information to patients but need some improvements in terms of better legibility and access to the most crucial information. PIL does not enable a comprehensive information with respect to patient’s health status. Most reliable source of information is considered to be a family practitioner. Pharmacists could play a more active role in the education of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者信息单张(PIL)和专业人员提供的药物信息的有用性:患者的观点。定性研究
背景:患者信息单张(PIL)是每个患者的重要信息来源。对于患者是否阅读PIL以及它是否包含有用的信息,人们知之甚少。药物相关信息的其他来源是专业人员(家庭医生、药剂师和护士)。告知患者药物信息可以提高他们的依从性。本研究的目的是从患者的角度确定PIL的有用性,评估专业人员作为药物相关信息的来源,并提出可以改善信息的建议,从而提高患者的依从性。方法:在斯洛文尼亚东北部不同的初级卫生保健中心进行了四次焦点小组访谈。焦点小组由随机选择的患者(共20人)组成,这些患者愿意就PILs、其他药物信息来源和可能的改进发表意见。数据的定性分析是基于录音带的转录。结果:患者有选择性地阅读药单。他们最感兴趣的是副作用、禁忌症和处方药的用途。与会者报告说,pil中的语言过于科学。如果他们不了解PILs或他们认识到一些副作用,大多数参与者决定首先联系家庭医生,很少联系药剂师或护士。家庭医生被认为是最值得信赖的信息来源,患者认为药剂师可以在患者教育中发挥更积极的作用。结论:目前的pill为患者提供了足够的部分信息,但在更好的易读性和获取最关键信息方面需要一些改进。PIL不能提供有关患者健康状况的全面信息。最可靠的信息来源被认为是家庭医生。药师可以在对患者的教育中发挥更积极的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy of an aerosol box to prevent infections during aerosol-generating procedures Sialendoscopy before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic THE EFFECT OF SARTANS ON THE PREGNANCY PARAVAGINAL AND RETROPERITONEAL HAEMATOMA POST PARTUM Iatrogenic streptococcus salivarius meningitis: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1