Current Trends in Critical Discourse Analyses of Textbooks: A Look at Selected Literature

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI:10.37213/cjal.2022.31515
Christopher A. Smith, J. Sheyholislami
{"title":"Current Trends in Critical Discourse Analyses of Textbooks: A Look at Selected Literature","authors":"Christopher A. Smith, J. Sheyholislami","doi":"10.37213/cjal.2022.31515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critical discourse analysis (CDA) has increasingly served to examine the content of textbooks. Given momentum by critical social inquiry pertaining to textbook content, this study looks at peer-reviewed literature drawn from three scholarly databases (JSTOR, ERIC, and SAGE; cross-referenced with searches on Google Scholar) that use critical discourse analysis for those investigations. Reviewing the selected literature, this study asks: What are the most represented approaches of CDA used for examining textbooks? What contextual themes appear to draw the most attention? In what fields of study are the examined textbooks situated? How do these emergent themes appear to be connected? What areas of research appear lacking in the collected literature? The findings illustrate that, while the methods of CDA and types of textbooks examined are diverse, the lion’s share of contextual attention and critical utility appear to be given to foundational approaches to CDA and textbooks used for English language teaching. Further research directions on textbooks from a CDA perspective are discussed.","PeriodicalId":43961,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2022.31515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) has increasingly served to examine the content of textbooks. Given momentum by critical social inquiry pertaining to textbook content, this study looks at peer-reviewed literature drawn from three scholarly databases (JSTOR, ERIC, and SAGE; cross-referenced with searches on Google Scholar) that use critical discourse analysis for those investigations. Reviewing the selected literature, this study asks: What are the most represented approaches of CDA used for examining textbooks? What contextual themes appear to draw the most attention? In what fields of study are the examined textbooks situated? How do these emergent themes appear to be connected? What areas of research appear lacking in the collected literature? The findings illustrate that, while the methods of CDA and types of textbooks examined are diverse, the lion’s share of contextual attention and critical utility appear to be given to foundational approaches to CDA and textbooks used for English language teaching. Further research directions on textbooks from a CDA perspective are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教科书批评话语分析的新趋势——以《文学选集》为例
批评性话语分析(CDA)越来越多地用于检验教科书的内容。鉴于与教科书内容相关的批判性社会调查的势头,本研究着眼于从三个学术数据库(JSTOR, ERIC和SAGE;与b谷歌Scholar上的搜索进行交叉参考),这些研究使用了批判性话语分析。回顾所选的文献,本研究提出了以下问题:在教科书检验中,批评性话语分析最具代表性的方法是什么?什么样的语境主题最能吸引人们的注意?被审查的教科书属于哪些研究领域?这些突现主题是如何联系在一起的?在收集的文献中缺少哪些研究领域?研究结果表明,尽管批评性话语分析的方法和所研究的教科书类型是多种多样的,但语境关注和关键效用的最大份额似乎是批评性话语分析的基本方法和用于英语教学的教科书。最后讨论了CDA视角下教科书的进一步研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Évaluer la compréhension en lecture d’un récit et d’un texte informatif auprès d’élèves de 8 ans Review of Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. Cambridge University Press. Review of Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Teachers’ Perceptions Toward Video as a Tool for Feedback on Students’ Oral Performance English-Language Proficiency Requirements for Migration to Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and the Implications for Language Testing Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1