What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017?

Kathryn P Hiller, A. Boulos, Megan M. Tran, Aristides I. Cruz
{"title":"What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017?","authors":"Kathryn P Hiller, A. Boulos, Megan M. Tran, Aristides I. Cruz","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe gender gap among authors publishing research in journals is narrowing in general medicine and various medical and surgical subspecialties. However, little is known regarding the gender gap among authors publishing research in orthopaedic journals.\n\n\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\n(1) What is the proportion of women first and last authors of original research articles in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017? (2) What is the proportion women first authors of original research by orthopaedic subspecialty from 2006 to 2017?\n\n\nMETHODS\nA sample of original research publications from the even numbered months of issues of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® (CORR®), the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American volume (JBJS), and the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) were examined from 2006 to 2017. These journals were selected because of their clinical relevance, target audience, and relatively high impact factors. Over the studied period, a single author extracted and reviewed pertinent data, including the gender of the first and last authors and the primary subspecialty of the research article. The senior author refereed disputes regarding the primary subspecialty of each included article. The proportion of women first and last authors in each journal was compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis. The proportion of women first authors according to orthopaedic subspecialty in which an article primarily focused its study was also compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nData were collected from 6292 articles, 13% (800) of which were first-authored by women and 10% (604) of which were last-authored by women. From 2006 to 2017, the overall percentage of women first authors in the examined journals increased (from 11% in 2006 to 17% in 2017; odds ratio 1.6563 [95 % CI 1.4945 to 1.8356]; p < 0.001). Overall across the period studied, the percentage of women first authors in JBJS was 14% while 12% of first authors in CORR and AJSM were women. Regarding subspecialty, the percentage of women first authorship ranged from 9% in the shoulder subspecialty to 21% in pediatric orthopaedics across all three journals.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThere has been an increase in the percentage of women first authors in articles published in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017. This observed increase is encouraging in terms of promoting gender diversity in orthopaedics and may be reflective of a modest increase in the number of women entering the orthopaedic workforce.\n\n\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\nBetween 2006 and 2017, the overall number of women first authors in CORR, JBJS, and AJSM modestly increased. This may suggest a nascent narrowing of the gender gap in orthopaedics. Although this is a welcome finding in terms of promoting and encouraging gender diversity in this man-dominated field, the overall percentage of women authorship remains modest, at best. Future investigations should examine whether the modest increase in women first authorship over time found in this study translates into an increased percentage of senior/last authorship in the future, as this may have implications for women orthopaedic workforce retention.","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"37 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

BACKGROUND The gender gap among authors publishing research in journals is narrowing in general medicine and various medical and surgical subspecialties. However, little is known regarding the gender gap among authors publishing research in orthopaedic journals. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What is the proportion of women first and last authors of original research articles in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017? (2) What is the proportion women first authors of original research by orthopaedic subspecialty from 2006 to 2017? METHODS A sample of original research publications from the even numbered months of issues of Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® (CORR®), the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American volume (JBJS), and the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) were examined from 2006 to 2017. These journals were selected because of their clinical relevance, target audience, and relatively high impact factors. Over the studied period, a single author extracted and reviewed pertinent data, including the gender of the first and last authors and the primary subspecialty of the research article. The senior author refereed disputes regarding the primary subspecialty of each included article. The proportion of women first and last authors in each journal was compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis. The proportion of women first authors according to orthopaedic subspecialty in which an article primarily focused its study was also compared between 2006 to 2017 using chi-square analysis. RESULTS Data were collected from 6292 articles, 13% (800) of which were first-authored by women and 10% (604) of which were last-authored by women. From 2006 to 2017, the overall percentage of women first authors in the examined journals increased (from 11% in 2006 to 17% in 2017; odds ratio 1.6563 [95 % CI 1.4945 to 1.8356]; p < 0.001). Overall across the period studied, the percentage of women first authors in JBJS was 14% while 12% of first authors in CORR and AJSM were women. Regarding subspecialty, the percentage of women first authorship ranged from 9% in the shoulder subspecialty to 21% in pediatric orthopaedics across all three journals. CONCLUSIONS There has been an increase in the percentage of women first authors in articles published in three high-impact orthopaedic journals from 2006 to 2017. This observed increase is encouraging in terms of promoting gender diversity in orthopaedics and may be reflective of a modest increase in the number of women entering the orthopaedic workforce. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Between 2006 and 2017, the overall number of women first authors in CORR, JBJS, and AJSM modestly increased. This may suggest a nascent narrowing of the gender gap in orthopaedics. Although this is a welcome finding in terms of promoting and encouraging gender diversity in this man-dominated field, the overall percentage of women authorship remains modest, at best. Future investigations should examine whether the modest increase in women first authorship over time found in this study translates into an increased percentage of senior/last authorship in the future, as this may have implications for women orthopaedic workforce retention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2006-2017年三种高影响力骨科期刊女性作者的比例和趋势是什么?
在普通医学和各种医学和外科专科期刊上发表研究的作者的性别差距正在缩小。问题/目的(1)2006 - 2017年三家高影响力骨科期刊原创研究文章的第一作者和最后作者中女性的比例是多少?(2) 2006 - 2017年骨科亚专科女性原创研究第一作者占比如何?方法选取2006 - 2017年《临床骨科与相关研究®》(CORR®)、《骨与关节外科杂志》(JBJS)、《美国卷》(JBJS)和《美国运动医学杂志》(AJSM)偶数月刊的原始研究出版物为样本进行分析。选择这些期刊是因为它们的临床相关性、目标受众和相对较高的影响因子。在研究期间,一位作者提取并审查了相关数据,包括第一作者和最后作者的性别以及研究文章的主要亚专业。资深作者对每篇纳入文章的主要亚专业的争议进行了评审。使用卡方分析比较了2006年至2017年各期刊中女性第一作者和最后作者的比例。在2006年至2017年期间,使用卡方分析比较了一篇文章主要集中研究的骨科亚专业中女性第一作者的比例。结果共收集到6292篇文献,其中13%(800篇)为女性第一作者,10%(604篇)为女性末作者。从2006年到2017年,在所研究期刊中,女性第一作者的总体比例有所增加(从2006年的11%增加到2017年的17%;优势比1.6563[95%可信区间1.4945 ~ 1.8356];P < 0.001)。在整个研究期间,JBJS的女性第一作者比例为14%,而CORR和AJSM的女性第一作者比例为12%。在亚专科方面,女性第一作者的比例从肩关节亚专科的9%到儿科骨科的21%不等。结论从2006年到2017年,在三种高影响力骨科期刊上发表的文章中,女性第一作者的比例有所增加。从促进骨科性别多样性的角度来看,这种观察到的增长是令人鼓舞的,这可能反映了进入骨科工作队伍的妇女人数的适度增加。临床相关性2006年至2017年间,CORR、JBJS和AJSM的女性第一作者总数略有增加。这可能表明骨科领域的性别差距正在逐渐缩小。虽然就促进和鼓励这个以男子为主的领域的性别多样性而言,这是一个可喜的发现,但妇女作者的总体百分比充其量仍然不大。未来的调查应该检查,随着时间的推移,本研究中发现的女性第一作者的适度增加是否会转化为未来高级/最后作者比例的增加,因为这可能对女性骨科劳动力的保留有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CORR Insights®: What is the Geographic Distribution of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons Throughout the United States? What Are the Rates and Trends of Women Authors in Three High-Impact Orthopaedic Journals from 2006-2017? CORR Insights®: Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties? CORR Insights®: Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies? Women Are at Higher Risk for Concussions Due to Ball or Equipment Contact in Soccer and Lacrosse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1