Comparative Study on Mechanical and Thermal Performance of eWLB, M-Series™ and Fan-Out Chip Last Packages

M. Shih, Ryan Chen, PeterBS Chen, Ying-Chih Lee, Karenyu Chen, Ian Hu, Tang-Yuan Chen, Lung Tsai, Eatice Chen, E. Tsai, D. Tarng, C. Hung
{"title":"Comparative Study on Mechanical and Thermal Performance of eWLB, M-Series™ and Fan-Out Chip Last Packages","authors":"M. Shih, Ryan Chen, PeterBS Chen, Ying-Chih Lee, Karenyu Chen, Ian Hu, Tang-Yuan Chen, Lung Tsai, Eatice Chen, E. Tsai, D. Tarng, C. Hung","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.2018.00252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, Fan-Out (FO) packages have become widely used in handheld, mobile consumer and internet of things (IoT) devices. FO packaging enables a greater I/O density as well as multiple components in the same package. Several types of FO packaging are offered in the market today, for example; embedded wafer level BGA (eWLB), M-Series™ as well as a flip chip based structure referred to as Fan-out Chip-Last Package (FOCLP) The work compares the mechanical and thermal performance of the three types of FO packages. Finite element analyses were carried out to examine mechanical performance metrics, including warpage, stress in the extreme low-k (ELK) interconnect and board level solder joint reliability. Thermal simulations were completed to compare the thermal dissipation differences among the FO package types. The paper concludes with a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the different FO structures studied.","PeriodicalId":6555,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"111 1","pages":"1676-1682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 68th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2018.00252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent years, Fan-Out (FO) packages have become widely used in handheld, mobile consumer and internet of things (IoT) devices. FO packaging enables a greater I/O density as well as multiple components in the same package. Several types of FO packaging are offered in the market today, for example; embedded wafer level BGA (eWLB), M-Series™ as well as a flip chip based structure referred to as Fan-out Chip-Last Package (FOCLP) The work compares the mechanical and thermal performance of the three types of FO packages. Finite element analyses were carried out to examine mechanical performance metrics, including warpage, stress in the extreme low-k (ELK) interconnect and board level solder joint reliability. Thermal simulations were completed to compare the thermal dissipation differences among the FO package types. The paper concludes with a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the different FO structures studied.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eWLB、m系列™和扇出芯片封装的机械和热性能比较研究
近年来,扇形输出(FO)封装已广泛应用于手持,移动消费和物联网(IoT)设备。FO封装可以实现更高的I/O密度以及同一封装中的多个组件。例如,目前市场上提供几种FO包装;嵌入式晶圆级BGA (eWLB), m系列™以及基于倒装芯片的结构(称为扇出芯片最后封装(FOCLP))的研究比较了三种类型的FO封装的机械和热性能。进行了有限元分析,以检查机械性能指标,包括翘曲,极低k (ELK)互连中的应力和板级焊点可靠性。通过热模拟比较不同FO封装类型的散热差异。文章最后总结了所研究的不同FO结构的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of Novel Fine Line 2.1 D Package with Organic Interposer Using Advanced Substrate-Based Process A Novel Finite Element Technique for Moisture Diffusion Modeling Using ANSYS Mechanical Modelling of High Power Lateral IGBT for LED Driver Applications Physical Aging of Epoxy Molding Compound and Its Influences on the Warpage of Reconstituted Wafer Controlling Die Warpage by Applying Under Bump Metallurgy for Fan-Out Package Process Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1