Probabilistic Validation: Theoretical Foundation and Methodological Platform

H. Bui, T. Sakurahara, S. Reihani, E. Kee, Z. Mohaghegh
{"title":"Probabilistic Validation: Theoretical Foundation and Methodological Platform","authors":"H. Bui, T. Sakurahara, S. Reihani, E. Kee, Z. Mohaghegh","doi":"10.1115/1.4056883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Addressing safety concerns in commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) often requires the use of advanced modeling and simulation (M&S) in association with the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). Advanced M&S are also needed to accelerate the analysis, design, licensing, and operationalization of advanced nuclear reactors. However, before a simulation model can be used for PRA, its validity must be adequately established. The objective of this research is to develop a systematic and scientifically justifiable validation methodology, namely, Probabilistic Validation (PV), to facilitate the validity evaluation (especially when validation data are not sufficiently available) of advanced simulation models that are used for PRA in support of risk-informed decision-making and regulation. This paper is the first in a series of two papers related to the PV that provides the theoretical foundation and methodological platform. The second paper applies the PV methodological platform for a case study of Fire PRA of NPPs. Although the PV methodology is explained in the context of PRA of the nuclear industry, it is grounded on a cross-disciplinary review of literature and so applicable to validation of simulation models, in general, not necessarily associated with PRA or nuclear applications.","PeriodicalId":44694,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing safety concerns in commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) often requires the use of advanced modeling and simulation (M&S) in association with the Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA). Advanced M&S are also needed to accelerate the analysis, design, licensing, and operationalization of advanced nuclear reactors. However, before a simulation model can be used for PRA, its validity must be adequately established. The objective of this research is to develop a systematic and scientifically justifiable validation methodology, namely, Probabilistic Validation (PV), to facilitate the validity evaluation (especially when validation data are not sufficiently available) of advanced simulation models that are used for PRA in support of risk-informed decision-making and regulation. This paper is the first in a series of two papers related to the PV that provides the theoretical foundation and methodological platform. The second paper applies the PV methodological platform for a case study of Fire PRA of NPPs. Although the PV methodology is explained in the context of PRA of the nuclear industry, it is grounded on a cross-disciplinary review of literature and so applicable to validation of simulation models, in general, not necessarily associated with PRA or nuclear applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概率验证:理论基础与方法平台
解决商业核电站(NPPs)的安全问题通常需要使用与概率风险评估(PRA)相关的高级建模和模拟(M&S)。先进的M&S还需要加速先进核反应堆的分析、设计、许可和运行。然而,在将仿真模型用于PRA之前,必须充分确定其有效性。本研究的目的是开发一种系统和科学合理的验证方法,即概率验证(PV),以促进用于PRA的高级仿真模型的有效性评估(特别是当验证数据不足时),以支持风险知情的决策和监管。本文是与PV相关的两篇系列论文中的第一篇,为PV提供了理论基础和方法论平台。第二篇论文应用PV方法平台对核电站的Fire PRA进行了案例研究。虽然PV方法是在核工业PRA的背景下解释的,但它是基于对文献的跨学科审查,因此通常适用于模拟模型的验证,不一定与PRA或核应用相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Verification and Validation of Rotating Machinery Using Digital Twin Risk Approach Based On the Fram Model for Vessel Traffic Management A Fault Detection Framework Based On Data-driven Digital Shadows Domain Adaptation Of Population-Based Of Bolted Joint Structures For Loss Detection Of Tightening Torque Human-Comfort Evaluation for A Patient-Transfer Robot through A Human-Robot Mechanical Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1