{"title":"Storage-Coupled Nuclear Combined Cycle","authors":"W. Conlon, C. Forsberg","doi":"10.1115/1.4055277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A new design paradigm for nuclear power plants is needed to complement the increasing adoption of low marginal cost variable renewable energy resources. The situation is reflected in the wholesale electricity price–duration curve with four distinct economic opportunities: (a) a hundred or so hours per year of high-value peaking power; (b) about 4000–5000 h of moderate electric prices; (c) about 2000 h per year when renewables set the marginal price at or near zero; and (d) about 1000 h of flexible ramping between the b and c regions. The current approach to the low-carbon energy transition reduces the need for baseload power and requires curtailment of conventional, nuclear, and even renewable generation, decreasing their capacity factors and increasing their fixed charges for electricity generation. Flexible low-carbon dispatchable power plants capable of daily cycling along with storage and time shifting of low-cost nondispatchable renewable power will be needed. Although nuclear power plants have demonstrated load-following capability, cycling can be limited by reactor kinetics (xenon poisoning) as well as by thermal stresses and fatigue considerations in the steam cycle. Storage of nuclear heat is hampered by the relatively low operating temperatures of existing nuclear reactors (but not advanced reactors) that lowers thermal to electric conversion efficiency, which in turn increases the required quantity of storage medium and the cost of storage. The quantity of storage medium can be reduced by integration of thermal energy storage with high-grade heat as in the liquid salt combined cycle (LSCC). The LSCC uses high-temperature gas turbine exhaust heat to increase the electricity output per unit of storage medium, uses the stored energy to add operating flexibility to a bottoming steam cycle, and substantially reduces the fuel heat rate. The low fuel heat rate improves economic competitiveness compared to alternative gas turbine-based power plants, especially when burning expensive fuels such as hydrogen. LSCC could be coupled to a nuclear power plant for time shifting both nuclear and renewable electricity and could support high utilization of a co-located hydrogen electrolysis plant. Further cost reduction could be achieved by using solid media for thermal energy storage, with the liquid salt used as a heat transfer medium.","PeriodicalId":8652,"journal":{"name":"ASME Open Journal of Engineering","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME Open Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4055277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new design paradigm for nuclear power plants is needed to complement the increasing adoption of low marginal cost variable renewable energy resources. The situation is reflected in the wholesale electricity price–duration curve with four distinct economic opportunities: (a) a hundred or so hours per year of high-value peaking power; (b) about 4000–5000 h of moderate electric prices; (c) about 2000 h per year when renewables set the marginal price at or near zero; and (d) about 1000 h of flexible ramping between the b and c regions. The current approach to the low-carbon energy transition reduces the need for baseload power and requires curtailment of conventional, nuclear, and even renewable generation, decreasing their capacity factors and increasing their fixed charges for electricity generation. Flexible low-carbon dispatchable power plants capable of daily cycling along with storage and time shifting of low-cost nondispatchable renewable power will be needed. Although nuclear power plants have demonstrated load-following capability, cycling can be limited by reactor kinetics (xenon poisoning) as well as by thermal stresses and fatigue considerations in the steam cycle. Storage of nuclear heat is hampered by the relatively low operating temperatures of existing nuclear reactors (but not advanced reactors) that lowers thermal to electric conversion efficiency, which in turn increases the required quantity of storage medium and the cost of storage. The quantity of storage medium can be reduced by integration of thermal energy storage with high-grade heat as in the liquid salt combined cycle (LSCC). The LSCC uses high-temperature gas turbine exhaust heat to increase the electricity output per unit of storage medium, uses the stored energy to add operating flexibility to a bottoming steam cycle, and substantially reduces the fuel heat rate. The low fuel heat rate improves economic competitiveness compared to alternative gas turbine-based power plants, especially when burning expensive fuels such as hydrogen. LSCC could be coupled to a nuclear power plant for time shifting both nuclear and renewable electricity and could support high utilization of a co-located hydrogen electrolysis plant. Further cost reduction could be achieved by using solid media for thermal energy storage, with the liquid salt used as a heat transfer medium.