Accuracy of Evaluation of Fatty Liver with Third-Generation Unenhanced Dual-Energy CT and MRI: Prospective Comparison with MR Spectroscopy

S. Rajesh, V. Arunachalam, Gopinath Periaswamy, Gobi Kalyan, Rupa Renganathan, Gowtham Sm, M. Cherian
{"title":"Accuracy of Evaluation of Fatty Liver with Third-Generation Unenhanced Dual-Energy CT and MRI: Prospective Comparison with MR Spectroscopy","authors":"S. Rajesh, V. Arunachalam, Gopinath Periaswamy, Gobi Kalyan, Rupa Renganathan, Gowtham Sm, M. Cherian","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1763483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and Objectives  The purpose of this study is to evaluate and establish the accuracy of noninvasive methods, including third-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and proton density fat (PDF) fraction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using three-dimensional multiecho multipoint chemical shift-encoded spoiled gradient echo (q-Dixon) sequence in the quantification of hepatic steatosis; with H1-MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods  A total of 47 patients were included in this prospective study. We studied the accuracy of fatty liver detection using third-generation DECT using mixed set images (MSIs), virtual monochromatic images (VMIs), and MRI q-Dixon. The results were compared with H1-MRS. Data were analyzed using linear regression for each technique compared with MRS. Results  Our study's correlation and linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between PDF values obtained by H1-MRS and MR q-Dixon methods ( r  = 0.821, r 2  = 0.674, p  < 0.001). On MSI, H1-MRS showed a low correlation with average liver attenuation ( r 2  = 0.379, p  < 0.001) and a moderate correlation with liver attenuation index ( r 2  = 0.508, p  < 0.001) noted. There was a moderate correlation between H1-MRS and average liver attenuation and liver attenuation index on VMI at 80 to 120 keV with r 2  = 0.434, p  < 0.001, and r 2  = 0.485, p  < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion  MRI q-Dixon is the method of choice for evaluating fat quantification in the absence of H1 MRS. Among DECT images, VMI is valuable in the evaluation of hepatic fat as compared with the mixed set of images.","PeriodicalId":52666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"079 - 088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives  The purpose of this study is to evaluate and establish the accuracy of noninvasive methods, including third-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) and proton density fat (PDF) fraction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using three-dimensional multiecho multipoint chemical shift-encoded spoiled gradient echo (q-Dixon) sequence in the quantification of hepatic steatosis; with H1-MR spectroscopy (MRS) as the reference standard. Materials and Methods  A total of 47 patients were included in this prospective study. We studied the accuracy of fatty liver detection using third-generation DECT using mixed set images (MSIs), virtual monochromatic images (VMIs), and MRI q-Dixon. The results were compared with H1-MRS. Data were analyzed using linear regression for each technique compared with MRS. Results  Our study's correlation and linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between PDF values obtained by H1-MRS and MR q-Dixon methods ( r  = 0.821, r 2  = 0.674, p  < 0.001). On MSI, H1-MRS showed a low correlation with average liver attenuation ( r 2  = 0.379, p  < 0.001) and a moderate correlation with liver attenuation index ( r 2  = 0.508, p  < 0.001) noted. There was a moderate correlation between H1-MRS and average liver attenuation and liver attenuation index on VMI at 80 to 120 keV with r 2  = 0.434, p  < 0.001, and r 2  = 0.485, p  < 0.001, respectively. Conclusion  MRI q-Dixon is the method of choice for evaluating fat quantification in the absence of H1 MRS. Among DECT images, VMI is valuable in the evaluation of hepatic fat as compared with the mixed set of images.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三代非增强双能CT和MRI评估脂肪肝的准确性:与磁共振光谱的前瞻性比较
背景与目的本研究的目的是评估和建立无创方法的准确性,包括第三代双源双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)和磁共振成像(MRI)上的质子密度脂肪(PDF)分数,利用三维多回波多点化学位移编码的破坏梯度回波(q-Dixon)序列定量肝脏脂肪变性;以H1-MR光谱(MRS)为参比标准。材料与方法本前瞻性研究共纳入47例患者。我们研究了第三代DECT使用混合集图像(msi)、虚拟单色图像(vmi)和MRI q-Dixon检测脂肪肝的准确性。结果与H1-MRS比较。结果本研究的相关分析和线性回归分析显示,H1-MRS法与MR q-Dixon法测定的PDF值具有良好的相关性(r = 0.821, r 2 = 0.674, p < 0.001)。在MSI上,H1-MRS与肝脏平均衰减呈低相关性(r 2 = 0.379, p < 0.001),与肝脏衰减指数呈中等相关性(r 2 = 0.508, p < 0.001)。80 ~ 120 keV时,H1-MRS与VMI平均肝衰减和肝衰减指数有中度相关性,r2 = 0.434, p < 0.001; r2 = 0.485, p < 0.001。结论MRI q-Dixon是在没有H1 mrs的情况下评估脂肪定量的首选方法。在DECT图像中,与混合图像集相比,VMI在评估肝脏脂肪方面更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Computed Tomography Scan Correlation of Position of Appendix with Present Literature Duplication of Gallbladder Amidst Out of the Ordinary Associated Anomalies Role of Ga68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Prostate Cancer Imaging Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Status and Future Directions Childhood Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: Acute Presentation of an Uncommon Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1