“A day-to-day struggle”: A comparative qualitative study on experiences of women with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Feminism & Psychology Pub Date : 2021-03-02 DOI:10.1177/09593535221083846
A. Hawkey, K. Chalmers, Sowbhagya Micheal, H. Diezel, M. Armour
{"title":"“A day-to-day struggle”: A comparative qualitative study on experiences of women with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain","authors":"A. Hawkey, K. Chalmers, Sowbhagya Micheal, H. Diezel, M. Armour","doi":"10.1177/09593535221083846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is a term that encompasses a range of conditions, including endometriosis, vulvodynia, painful bladder syndrome and adenomyosis. Given the impact on penetrative sex, fertility and potentially motherhood, CPP may also impact on women's identities as a wife or partner, a mother, and a woman. The aim of this study was to explore similarities and differences in experiences of women with endometriosis and non-endometriosis related CPP. A total of 17 participants aged between 21 and 48 years old participated in three focus groups. Using reflexive thematic analysis three main themes were found: the struggling woman, the unheard woman and the self-silenced woman. Women, regardless of the cause of their CPP, reported significant impacts on their intimate relationships, fertility, and parenting but those with non-endometriosis CPP often reported greater trouble communicating about pelvic pain in the workplace due to the “taboo” nature of discussing their vulval pain. Many participants described how a societal normalisation of pelvic pain resulted in women silencing their experiences, rendering their pain invisible. While women wanted to resist such silencing through information and support seeking, women with non-endometriosis CPP described fewer avenues to accessing credible informational resources or networks for support.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminism & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221083846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is a term that encompasses a range of conditions, including endometriosis, vulvodynia, painful bladder syndrome and adenomyosis. Given the impact on penetrative sex, fertility and potentially motherhood, CPP may also impact on women's identities as a wife or partner, a mother, and a woman. The aim of this study was to explore similarities and differences in experiences of women with endometriosis and non-endometriosis related CPP. A total of 17 participants aged between 21 and 48 years old participated in three focus groups. Using reflexive thematic analysis three main themes were found: the struggling woman, the unheard woman and the self-silenced woman. Women, regardless of the cause of their CPP, reported significant impacts on their intimate relationships, fertility, and parenting but those with non-endometriosis CPP often reported greater trouble communicating about pelvic pain in the workplace due to the “taboo” nature of discussing their vulval pain. Many participants described how a societal normalisation of pelvic pain resulted in women silencing their experiences, rendering their pain invisible. While women wanted to resist such silencing through information and support seeking, women with non-endometriosis CPP described fewer avenues to accessing credible informational resources or networks for support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“日复一日的斗争”:子宫内膜异位症和慢性盆腔疼痛妇女经历的比较定性研究
女性慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)是一个包含一系列病症的术语,包括子宫内膜异位症、外阴痛、膀胱疼痛综合征和子宫腺肌病。考虑到对插入性行为、生育能力和潜在母性的影响,CPP也可能影响女性作为妻子或伴侣、母亲和女性的身份。本研究的目的是探讨子宫内膜异位症和非子宫内膜异位症相关的CPP妇女经历的异同。共有17名年龄在21岁至48岁之间的参与者参加了三个焦点小组。通过反身性主题分析,作者发现了三个主题:挣扎的女人、被忽视的女人和自我沉默的女人。不管是什么原因引起的CPP,都对她们的亲密关系、生育能力和养育子女产生了重大影响,但那些患有非子宫内膜异位症的CPP的女性经常报告说,由于讨论外阴疼痛的“禁忌”性质,她们在工作场所沟通盆腔疼痛时遇到了更大的麻烦。许多参与者描述了骨盆疼痛的社会正常化如何导致女性沉默她们的经历,使她们的痛苦被忽视。尽管女性希望通过寻求信息和支持来抵制这种沉默,但患有非子宫内膜异位症的CPP女性描述了获得可靠信息资源或支持网络的途径较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Feminism & Psychology provides a forum for debate at the interface between feminism and psychology. The journal"s principal aim is to foster the development of feminist theory and practice in – and beyond – psychology. It publishes high-quality original research, theoretical articles, and commentaries. We are interested in pieces that provide insights into the gendered reality of everyday lives, especially in relation to women and girls, as well as pieces that address broader theoretical issues. Feminism & Psychology seeks to publish work from scholars, researchers, activists and practitioners at all stages of their careers who share a feminist analysis of the overlapping domains of gender and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: A feminist companion to social psychology by Madeleine Pownall and Wendy Rogers Conspiracy theories in online deliberation on gender identity legislation: Dilemmas of prejudice and political partisanship and implications for LGBTQI+ claims “Troubled” derby subjectivities: Wellbeing and feminist new materialist movements in sport “I am not a monster”: An affective–discursive analysis of men's perspectives on their engagement in violence against women Navigating violence and risk: A critical discourse analysis of blind women's portrayals of self-protective measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1