The Role of State Policy in Fostering Health Information Exchange in the United States

Ari Bronsoler, J. Doyle, Cason D. Schmit, John Michael Van Reenen
{"title":"The Role of State Policy in Fostering Health Information Exchange in the United States","authors":"Ari Bronsoler, J. Doyle, Cason D. Schmit, John Michael Van Reenen","doi":"10.1056/cat.22.0302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely agreed that health information sharing holds enormous potential to improve health care productivity. Although the adoption of electronic health records in the United States over the past 15 years has been impressive, the use of data — and subsequent improvements in health care productivity — has been disappointing. This article considers the role that state policy plays in the adoption and use of health information exchange (HIE) across providers. The authors built a novel database of state laws from 2000 through 2019 that tracks 12 dimensions of policies that may facilitate HIE usage. The dimensions fall along four categories: clarifying HIE governance, strengthening financial stability, specifying the uses and users of an HIE, and protecting the underlying data. The authors find that regulations related to privacy protections and HIE financial viability have substantial effects on information sharing. The category that has the strongest relationship with health information sharing is related to data protection. In states that add a dimension making the protection of data less costly, HIE usage increases by 18%. Within the category of data-protection measures, one stands out: enacting legislation that has patients participate by default leads to a 16% increase in usage. Adding a dimension for each of the other three categories leads to a 4% increase in HIE usage, although only the relationship with financial sustainability is measured precisely enough to be statistically significant. In particular, states that set up the ability to charge participant fees and authorize the HIE to request state, federal, and private funding achieve greater HIE. These results point to policy levers that can catalyze the use of digital tools to improve health and lower health care costs.","PeriodicalId":19057,"journal":{"name":"Nejm Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nejm Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/cat.22.0302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is widely agreed that health information sharing holds enormous potential to improve health care productivity. Although the adoption of electronic health records in the United States over the past 15 years has been impressive, the use of data — and subsequent improvements in health care productivity — has been disappointing. This article considers the role that state policy plays in the adoption and use of health information exchange (HIE) across providers. The authors built a novel database of state laws from 2000 through 2019 that tracks 12 dimensions of policies that may facilitate HIE usage. The dimensions fall along four categories: clarifying HIE governance, strengthening financial stability, specifying the uses and users of an HIE, and protecting the underlying data. The authors find that regulations related to privacy protections and HIE financial viability have substantial effects on information sharing. The category that has the strongest relationship with health information sharing is related to data protection. In states that add a dimension making the protection of data less costly, HIE usage increases by 18%. Within the category of data-protection measures, one stands out: enacting legislation that has patients participate by default leads to a 16% increase in usage. Adding a dimension for each of the other three categories leads to a 4% increase in HIE usage, although only the relationship with financial sustainability is measured precisely enough to be statistically significant. In particular, states that set up the ability to charge participant fees and authorize the HIE to request state, federal, and private funding achieve greater HIE. These results point to policy levers that can catalyze the use of digital tools to improve health and lower health care costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家政策在促进美国卫生信息交流中的作用
人们普遍认为,卫生信息共享在提高卫生保健生产力方面具有巨大潜力。尽管在过去的15年里,电子健康记录在美国的采用令人印象深刻,但数据的使用——以及随后医疗保健生产力的提高——却令人失望。本文考虑了状态策略在跨提供者采用和使用健康信息交换(HIE)中所起的作用。作者建立了一个从2000年到2019年的州法律的新数据库,跟踪了可能促进HIE使用的12个政策维度。这些维度分为四类:澄清HIE治理、加强金融稳定性、指定HIE的用途和用户,以及保护基础数据。作者发现,与隐私保护和HIE财务可行性相关的法规对信息共享有实质性影响。与健康信息共享关系最密切的类别与数据保护有关。在增加了降低数据保护成本的维度的州,HIE的使用率增加了18%。在数据保护措施的类别中,有一项措施引人注目:制定让患者默认参与的立法导致使用率增加16%。为其他三个类别中的每一个增加一个维度,导致HIE使用量增加4%,尽管只有与财务可持续性的关系被精确测量到足以具有统计意义。特别是,建立了向参与者收取费用的能力并授权HIE请求州、联邦和私人资金的州,可以实现更大的HIE。这些结果指出了可以促进使用数字工具来改善健康和降低医疗保健成本的政策杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plugging Public Health Data into the Health IT Ecosystem to Protect National Health Knocking Down Public Health and Health Care Silos: An Innovative Covid-19 Health Equity Response Improving the Value of Health Care and Accelerating Care Delivery Transformation Intake Hospitalist: A New Role to Maximize the Safety and Efficiency of Interhospital Transfers Implementing an Automated Prediction Model to Improve Prescribing of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1