Multimodal composition pedagogy in Higher Education: a paradigm shift

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5785/37-2-996
L. Olivier
{"title":"Multimodal composition pedagogy in Higher Education: a paradigm shift","authors":"L. Olivier","doi":"10.5785/37-2-996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of digital technologies for pedagogical purposes worldwide has augmented the need for radical and urgent changes in academic literacy education at tertiary institutions. In this article, multimodal composition alternatives to traditional written academic assessments are proposed as a platform for transformation in academic literacy modules. The literature framework highlights the hindrances and affordances of multimodal composition pedagogy. A qualitative research approach was followed in the empirical research. An online questionnaire was used in this interpretivist research design. The opinions of academic literacy lecturers at a South African university were sought to gauge how they felt about incorporating alternative multimodal assessments instead of traditional methods such as text-based compositions only. The inclusion of student voice and agency regarding multimodal academic literacy pedagogy was also investigated. The findings revealed that many lecturers did incorporate formative multimodal teaching and learning strategies to scaffold academic writing. However, with regards to summative assessment of academic literacy skills, most lecturers still preferred the traditional essay. Most of the lecturers were also not in favour of student contribution to multimodal content and assessment. It is the responsibility of all stakeholders to ensure that multimodal composition transformation is implemented to support students’ academic literacy needs, not their own, in an ever-changing digital landscape in higher education.","PeriodicalId":43109,"journal":{"name":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5785/37-2-996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The use of digital technologies for pedagogical purposes worldwide has augmented the need for radical and urgent changes in academic literacy education at tertiary institutions. In this article, multimodal composition alternatives to traditional written academic assessments are proposed as a platform for transformation in academic literacy modules. The literature framework highlights the hindrances and affordances of multimodal composition pedagogy. A qualitative research approach was followed in the empirical research. An online questionnaire was used in this interpretivist research design. The opinions of academic literacy lecturers at a South African university were sought to gauge how they felt about incorporating alternative multimodal assessments instead of traditional methods such as text-based compositions only. The inclusion of student voice and agency regarding multimodal academic literacy pedagogy was also investigated. The findings revealed that many lecturers did incorporate formative multimodal teaching and learning strategies to scaffold academic writing. However, with regards to summative assessment of academic literacy skills, most lecturers still preferred the traditional essay. Most of the lecturers were also not in favour of student contribution to multimodal content and assessment. It is the responsibility of all stakeholders to ensure that multimodal composition transformation is implemented to support students’ academic literacy needs, not their own, in an ever-changing digital landscape in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中的多模态作文教学法:范式转变
数字技术在全球范围内用于教学目的,增加了对高等院校学术扫盲教育进行彻底和紧迫变革的需求。本文提出了多模态作文替代传统的书面学术评估,作为学术素养模块转型的平台。文献框架强调了多模态作曲教学法的障碍和优点。实证研究采用定性研究方法。本研究采用在线问卷调查的方式。一所南非大学的学术素养讲师的意见被寻求来衡量他们对采用替代的多模式评估方法而不是传统的方法,如仅基于文本的作文的看法。此外,本研究亦调查了多模态学术素养教学法中学生的声音与能动性。研究结果显示,许多讲师确实采用了形成性多模态教学和学习策略来支撑学术写作。然而,对于学术素养技能的总结性评估,大多数讲师仍然倾向于传统的论文。大多数讲师也不赞成学生对多模式内容和评价作出贡献。在高等教育不断变化的数字环境中,所有利益相关者都有责任确保实施多模态作文转换,以支持学生的学术素养需求,而不是他们自己的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning
Per Linguam-A Journal of Language Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Iingxoxobunzululwazi zaseAfrika Iingxoxobunzululwazi zaseAfrika Ngokufa Kolwimi: izizathu neendlela zokukhawulelana nokufa kolwimi African scientific discussions on language death: reasons for, and methods of, dealing with language death Turn-taking in multilingual classroom interaction Le jeu comme outil de motivation en classe de Français Langue Etrangere au Lesotho: Le cas de Tsakholo High School Games as a way to motivate a French as a Foreign Language classroom: the case of Tsakholo High School Mediating meaning in booktalk: Reading Clubs as third spaces Using Process-oriented, Guided-inquiry Learning in the Teaching of Academic Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1