Application of Machine Learning in Wet Gas Measurement Predictions

Ziad Sidaoui, Yasmeen Alsunbul, M. Abbad
{"title":"Application of Machine Learning in Wet Gas Measurement Predictions","authors":"Ziad Sidaoui, Yasmeen Alsunbul, M. Abbad","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22495-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Venturi tube, a classic single-phase flow meter, proved to be a reliable and accurate wet gas flow meter, but it requires correction. The presence of liquid content increases the measured differential pressure across the Venturi tube and causes over-reading (OR). Developing novel methods to correct the Venturi tube readings has become a target in the oil & gas industry to quantify production from individual wells. This work is proposing a new approach to overcome the OR challenge using machine learning (ML) models.\n The ML model to predict OR was developed using the random forest (RF) technique. Initially, synthetic dataset of producing wells were generated. A variation on the type of gasses and liquids were studied including nitrogen and benzene, argon and water, natural gas and water and natural gas and decan. The input parameters consist of fluid properties and fluid conditions. The fluid properties are including gas and liquid phases. The target for these inputs is to predict the OR. The results were then evaluated based on root-mean-square error (RMSE), and the fitness of the model was assessed by the coefficient of determination R2.\n The ML model showed high accuracy results for the OR prediction of the testing data of R2=0.997 and RMSE of 0.7%. The developed model was then applied to a new set of data of air and water for further validation. This validation resulted in R2= 0.998 and RMSE of 0.5%. This shows that the RF technique is capable of predicting the OR in wet gas when the aforementioned input parameters are used. The uniqueness of this ML model is that the inputs are all measurable in the field. Once the OR is predicted, the \"real\" gas mass flow rate can be calculated directly.\n The novelty of this work lies in providing a robust method to calculate the \"real\" gas mass flow rate real-time which ultimately diminishes the need to use published correlations derived from experimental conditions that are not necessarily representative of the oil field conditions.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22495-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Venturi tube, a classic single-phase flow meter, proved to be a reliable and accurate wet gas flow meter, but it requires correction. The presence of liquid content increases the measured differential pressure across the Venturi tube and causes over-reading (OR). Developing novel methods to correct the Venturi tube readings has become a target in the oil & gas industry to quantify production from individual wells. This work is proposing a new approach to overcome the OR challenge using machine learning (ML) models. The ML model to predict OR was developed using the random forest (RF) technique. Initially, synthetic dataset of producing wells were generated. A variation on the type of gasses and liquids were studied including nitrogen and benzene, argon and water, natural gas and water and natural gas and decan. The input parameters consist of fluid properties and fluid conditions. The fluid properties are including gas and liquid phases. The target for these inputs is to predict the OR. The results were then evaluated based on root-mean-square error (RMSE), and the fitness of the model was assessed by the coefficient of determination R2. The ML model showed high accuracy results for the OR prediction of the testing data of R2=0.997 and RMSE of 0.7%. The developed model was then applied to a new set of data of air and water for further validation. This validation resulted in R2= 0.998 and RMSE of 0.5%. This shows that the RF technique is capable of predicting the OR in wet gas when the aforementioned input parameters are used. The uniqueness of this ML model is that the inputs are all measurable in the field. Once the OR is predicted, the "real" gas mass flow rate can be calculated directly. The novelty of this work lies in providing a robust method to calculate the "real" gas mass flow rate real-time which ultimately diminishes the need to use published correlations derived from experimental conditions that are not necessarily representative of the oil field conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在湿气测量预测中的应用
文丘里管,一个经典的单相流量计,被证明是一个可靠和准确的湿气流量计,但它需要修正。液体含量的存在增加了文丘里管的测量压差,导致过读(OR)。开发校正文丘里管读数的新方法已成为石油和天然气行业量化单井产量的目标。这项工作提出了一种使用机器学习(ML)模型来克服OR挑战的新方法。利用随机森林(RF)技术建立了预测OR的ML模型。首先,生成生产井的合成数据集。研究了不同类型的气体和液体,包括氮气和苯,氩气和水,天然气和水,天然气和decan。输入参数包括流体性质和流体状态。流体的性质包括气相和液相。这些输入的目标是预测OR。采用均方根误差(RMSE)对结果进行评价,采用决定系数R2评价模型的适应度。ML模型对检验数据的OR预测结果具有较高的准确性,R2=0.997, RMSE为0.7%。然后将开发的模型应用于一组新的空气和水数据,以进一步验证。验证结果R2= 0.998, RMSE为0.5%。这表明,当使用上述输入参数时,射频技术能够预测湿气中的OR。这个机器学习模型的独特之处在于输入都是可测量的。一旦预测了OR,就可以直接计算出“真实”气体质量流量。这项工作的新颖之处在于提供了一种可靠的方法来实时计算“真实”气体质量流量,最终减少了使用从不一定代表油田条件的实验条件得出的已发布相关性的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Data Driven Method to Predict and Restore Missing Well Head Flow Pressure Downhole Camera Run Validates Limited Entry Fracturing Technique and Improves Pay Coverage in Deep Tight Laminated Gas Reservoir of Western India An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Oil/Gas Composition on the Performance of Carbonated Water Injection CWI SmartPoint Seismic Data Acquisition System Reservoir Characterization for Isolated Porosity from Multi-Frequency Dielectric Measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1