Simulating Squeeze Treatments in Wells Completed with Inflow Control Devices

A. Kaur, R. Stalker, G. Graham
{"title":"Simulating Squeeze Treatments in Wells Completed with Inflow Control Devices","authors":"A. Kaur, R. Stalker, G. Graham","doi":"10.2118/190740-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The advent of wells with extremely long producing intervals, extended-reach and multilateral wells, typically completed in heterogeneous formations, brings with it challenges regarding completion design to maximize overall production in a sustained manner. Judicious placement of Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) can ensure a more even inflow of fluids along the full length of the interval, delaying water or gas breakthrough and in some cases restricting water production. Such devices also influence the placement of chemical treatments, such as scale-inhibitor \"squeeze\" treatments, which in turn affects the subsequent treatment lifetimes and efficiency.\n This paper presents a new analytical model to explicitly simulate the effect of ICDs on squeeze treatments and, in particular, on treatment placement and consequent lifetimes. The explicit method of modelling ICDs, which is based on Bernoulli's theorem of constricted flow through a pipe, is compared with other implicit phenomenological approaches, such as modelling the effect of an ICD as a damaged region using a dual-permeability model. By this comparison, the relevance of dual permeability modelling for simulating ICDs is presented. The relationship between chemical placement and inhibitor return has been clearly demonstrated in other publications (James et al., 2005, Sorbie et al. 2005). This paper illustrates the additional effects that ICDs bring to the placement challenge, highlighting the key parameters that can influence the zonal injectivity behaviour. The presence of ICDs in the well is shown not only to benefit the well's inflow profile during production but can also favourably influence the outcome of squeeze chemical treatments.\n In summary, the paper describes the development of an important new tool to assist in the design of optimum chemical treatment strategies in wells completed with ICDs, without the need to use more complex reservoir simulators for near-wellbore treatment in complex completions.","PeriodicalId":10969,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, June 21, 2018","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, June 21, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190740-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of wells with extremely long producing intervals, extended-reach and multilateral wells, typically completed in heterogeneous formations, brings with it challenges regarding completion design to maximize overall production in a sustained manner. Judicious placement of Inflow Control Devices (ICDs) can ensure a more even inflow of fluids along the full length of the interval, delaying water or gas breakthrough and in some cases restricting water production. Such devices also influence the placement of chemical treatments, such as scale-inhibitor "squeeze" treatments, which in turn affects the subsequent treatment lifetimes and efficiency. This paper presents a new analytical model to explicitly simulate the effect of ICDs on squeeze treatments and, in particular, on treatment placement and consequent lifetimes. The explicit method of modelling ICDs, which is based on Bernoulli's theorem of constricted flow through a pipe, is compared with other implicit phenomenological approaches, such as modelling the effect of an ICD as a damaged region using a dual-permeability model. By this comparison, the relevance of dual permeability modelling for simulating ICDs is presented. The relationship between chemical placement and inhibitor return has been clearly demonstrated in other publications (James et al., 2005, Sorbie et al. 2005). This paper illustrates the additional effects that ICDs bring to the placement challenge, highlighting the key parameters that can influence the zonal injectivity behaviour. The presence of ICDs in the well is shown not only to benefit the well's inflow profile during production but can also favourably influence the outcome of squeeze chemical treatments. In summary, the paper describes the development of an important new tool to assist in the design of optimum chemical treatment strategies in wells completed with ICDs, without the need to use more complex reservoir simulators for near-wellbore treatment in complex completions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用流入控制装置完井的模拟挤压处理
超长生产层段、大位移井和分支井的出现,通常是在非均质地层中完成的,这给完井设计带来了挑战,如何以持续的方式最大化总产量。明智地放置流入控制装置(icd)可以确保整个井段的流体流入更加均匀,延迟水或气的突破,在某些情况下还可以限制产水。此类装置还会影响化学处理的放置,例如阻垢剂“挤压”处理,从而影响后续处理的使用寿命和效率。本文提出了一个新的分析模型来明确模拟icd对挤压处理的影响,特别是对处理位置和随后的使用寿命的影响。基于伯努利管道收缩流动定理的显式ICD建模方法与其他隐式现象学方法进行了比较,例如使用双渗透率模型将ICD的影响建模为受损区域。通过比较,提出了双渗透率模型在模拟icd中的适用性。其他出版物已经清楚地证明了化学放置和抑制剂返回之间的关系(James et al., 2005, Sorbie et al. 2005)。本文阐述了icd给布置带来的额外影响,重点介绍了影响层间注入能力的关键参数。研究表明,在生产过程中,icd的存在不仅有利于井的流入剖面,而且对挤压化学处理的结果也有积极的影响。综上所述,本文描述了一种重要的新工具的开发,该工具可以帮助在使用icd完井的井中设计最佳化学处理策略,而无需在复杂完井中使用更复杂的油藏模拟器进行近井处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scale Formation and Inhibition Study for Water Injection Wells Application of Electroless Nickel Coating as a Scaling Resistant Alloy in Thermal Production Simulating Squeeze Treatments in Wells Completed with Inflow Control Devices A Novel Solution to Remove Carbonate and Sulfate Scale in Electric Submersible Pumps, Offshore Oil Wells in the Gulf of Mexico Impact of Polymer EOR and Salinity on Barium Sulphate Scale Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1