Impact of Adding Favipiravir to Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Treatment on QTc Interval in COVID-19

I. Cerik, Hatun Öztürk Çerik, A. Dogan, S. Dereli, O. Bektaş, Y. Kaya
{"title":"Impact of Adding Favipiravir to Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Treatment on QTc Interval in COVID-19","authors":"I. Cerik, Hatun Öztürk Çerik, A. Dogan, S. Dereli, O. Bektaş, Y. Kaya","doi":"10.5336/CARDIOSCI.2020-80082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused the death of many people worldwide. Treatment protocol had to be developed as soon as possible so drug combinations, whose reliability has not been fully disclosed, have started to be used. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of azithromycin (AZT), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and favipiravir (FVR) combination on the corrected QT (QTc) interval. Material and Methods: Eighty-four consecutive COVID 19 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients received AZT and HCQ, however, FVR was added to the combination in 32 patients with severe pneumonia at the beginning. ECG characteristics of all patients before treatment and on the fifth day of treatment were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the HCQ+AZT group (n=52) and HCQ+AZT+FVR groups (n=32) in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. QTc interval significantly prolonged on the fifth day of treatment in the HCQ+AZT group (413,75±30,13;440,27±36,11 p<0.001) and in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group (426,65±32,83;468,22±42,13 p<0.001). When both groups were compared in terms of ΔQTc, a significant increase was observed in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group compared to the HCQ+AZT group (40(-14/175), 23(-28/213) respectively, p=0.042). In seven of the patients, QTc> 500 ms was detected after the treatment, four patients in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group and three patients in the HCQ+AZT group. Conclusion: We observed that FVR caused more prolongation in the QTc interval when used with the combination of HCQ+AZT. We recommend that patients who receive this treatment be monitored more closely for QTc.","PeriodicalId":39118,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/CARDIOSCI.2020-80082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused the death of many people worldwide. Treatment protocol had to be developed as soon as possible so drug combinations, whose reliability has not been fully disclosed, have started to be used. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of azithromycin (AZT), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and favipiravir (FVR) combination on the corrected QT (QTc) interval. Material and Methods: Eighty-four consecutive COVID 19 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients received AZT and HCQ, however, FVR was added to the combination in 32 patients with severe pneumonia at the beginning. ECG characteristics of all patients before treatment and on the fifth day of treatment were compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the HCQ+AZT group (n=52) and HCQ+AZT+FVR groups (n=32) in terms of baseline clinical characteristics. QTc interval significantly prolonged on the fifth day of treatment in the HCQ+AZT group (413,75±30,13;440,27±36,11 p<0.001) and in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group (426,65±32,83;468,22±42,13 p<0.001). When both groups were compared in terms of ΔQTc, a significant increase was observed in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group compared to the HCQ+AZT group (40(-14/175), 23(-28/213) respectively, p=0.042). In seven of the patients, QTc> 500 ms was detected after the treatment, four patients in the HCQ+AZT+FVR group and three patients in the HCQ+AZT group. Conclusion: We observed that FVR caused more prolongation in the QTc interval when used with the combination of HCQ+AZT. We recommend that patients who receive this treatment be monitored more closely for QTc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法匹拉韦联合羟氯喹和阿奇霉素治疗对COVID-19患者QTc间期的影响
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已在全球范围内造成许多人死亡。必须尽快制定治疗方案,以便开始使用其可靠性尚未充分披露的药物组合。在本研究中,我们旨在评估阿奇霉素(AZT)、羟氯喹(HCQ)和法匹拉韦(FVR)联合使用对校正QT间期(QTc)的影响。材料和方法:84例连续的COVID - 19患者入组研究。所有患者均接受AZT和HCQ治疗,但32例重症肺炎患者在开始时加用FVR。比较所有患者治疗前和治疗第5天的心电图特征。结果:HCQ+AZT组(n=52)与HCQ+AZT+FVR组(n=32)在基线临床特征方面无显著差异。治疗第5天,HCQ+AZT组QTc间期明显延长(413、75±30、13;440、27±36、11),治疗后500 ms, HCQ+AZT+FVR组4例,HCQ+AZT组3例。结论:我们观察到FVR与HCQ+AZT联合使用时更能延长QTc间期。我们建议对接受这种治疗的患者进行更密切的QTc监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciences
Turkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciences Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anxiety Levels of Cardiovascular Surgery Patients: Investigation of Coping Methods, Self-Efficacy Level and Social Support Mechanisms: Descriptive and Relational Research Determining the Effectiveness of Discharge Training Provided After Heart Surgery Through Phone Counselling: Descriptive Research Circulating Long Intergenic Non-Coding RNA LINC01538 as Potential Novel Biomarker for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Prospective Cohort Study Comparison of the Results of Open Trap-Door Technique and Closed Coronary Transfer Technique in Arterial Switch Operations: A Retrospective Clinical Study Prophylactic Use of Levosimendan in High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease: Retrospective Clinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1