Exploring Relations between Beliefs about the Genetic Etiology of Virtue and the Endorsement of Parenting Practices

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Parenting-Science and Practice Pub Date : 2020-07-24 DOI:10.1080/15295192.2020.1792185
Grace N. Rivera, Matthew Vess, R. J. Brooker, Matt Stichter, J. Neiderhiser
{"title":"Exploring Relations between Beliefs about the Genetic Etiology of Virtue and the Endorsement of Parenting Practices","authors":"Grace N. Rivera, Matthew Vess, R. J. Brooker, Matt Stichter, J. Neiderhiser","doi":"10.1080/15295192.2020.1792185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS Objective. We investigated associations between adults’ beliefs about the heritability of virtue and endorsements of the efficacy of specific parenting styles. Design. In Studies 1 (N = 405) and 2 (N = 400), beliefs about both the genetic etiology of virtuous characteristics and parenting were assessed in samples of parents and non-parents. In Study 3 (N = 775), participants were induced to view virtue as determined by genes or as determined by social factors. Heritability beliefs and authoritarian parenting endorsements were subsequently measured. Results. Study 1 and Study 2 converged to reveal that tendencies to view characteristics as determined by genes were positively associated with endorsement of authoritarian parenting styles. This association occurred independent of individual differences in essentialism and right-wing authoritarianism. Study 3 revealed that exposure to genetic accounts of virtue increased beliefs that virtue is caused by genes, which in turn was positively associated with endorsements of authoritarian parenting responses to child problem behavior. Exposure to genetic accounts of virtue increased endorsement of authoritarian parenting among parents, but was unrelated to authoritarian parenting among non-parents. Conclusions. These studies suggest that genetic accounts of virtuous characteristics reliably relate to more positive beliefs about harsh and controlling parenting practices, illuminating an unrecognized cognitive factor associated with authoritarian parenting endorsement.","PeriodicalId":47432,"journal":{"name":"Parenting-Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parenting-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2020.1792185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Objective. We investigated associations between adults’ beliefs about the heritability of virtue and endorsements of the efficacy of specific parenting styles. Design. In Studies 1 (N = 405) and 2 (N = 400), beliefs about both the genetic etiology of virtuous characteristics and parenting were assessed in samples of parents and non-parents. In Study 3 (N = 775), participants were induced to view virtue as determined by genes or as determined by social factors. Heritability beliefs and authoritarian parenting endorsements were subsequently measured. Results. Study 1 and Study 2 converged to reveal that tendencies to view characteristics as determined by genes were positively associated with endorsement of authoritarian parenting styles. This association occurred independent of individual differences in essentialism and right-wing authoritarianism. Study 3 revealed that exposure to genetic accounts of virtue increased beliefs that virtue is caused by genes, which in turn was positively associated with endorsements of authoritarian parenting responses to child problem behavior. Exposure to genetic accounts of virtue increased endorsement of authoritarian parenting among parents, but was unrelated to authoritarian parenting among non-parents. Conclusions. These studies suggest that genetic accounts of virtuous characteristics reliably relate to more positive beliefs about harsh and controlling parenting practices, illuminating an unrecognized cognitive factor associated with authoritarian parenting endorsement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德性遗传病因信念与育儿实践认同之关系探讨
大纲的目标。我们调查了成年人关于美德可遗传性的信念和对特定养育方式有效性的认可之间的联系。设计。在研究1 (N = 405)和研究2 (N = 400)中,研究人员在父母和非父母的样本中评估了美德特征和养育方式的遗传病因。在研究3 (N = 775)中,参与者被诱导将美德视为由基因决定或由社会因素决定。随后测量了遗传信念和专制父母的支持。结果。研究1和研究2共同揭示了将性格特征视为由基因决定的倾向与对专制教育方式的认可呈正相关。这种联系与本质主义和右翼威权主义的个体差异无关。研究3显示,接触美德的基因解释增加了美德是由基因引起的信念,这反过来又与对儿童问题行为的专制父母反应的认可呈正相关。接触到美德的遗传解释增加了父母对专制教育的认可,但与非父母的专制教育无关。结论。这些研究表明,美德特征的遗传解释与对严厉和控制的父母做法的更积极的信念可靠地相关,阐明了与专制父母认可相关的一个未被认识的认知因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Parenting: Science and Practice strives to promote the exchange of empirical findings, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches from all disciplines that help to define and advance theory, research, and practice in parenting, caregiving, and childrearing broadly construed. "Parenting" is interpreted to include biological parents and grandparents, adoptive parents, nonparental caregivers, and others, including infrahuman parents. Articles on parenting itself, antecedents of parenting, parenting effects on parents and on children, the multiple contexts of parenting, and parenting interventions and education are all welcome. The journal brings parenting to science and science to parenting.
期刊最新文献
Effects of a Baby Carrier Intervention on Fathers' Sensitivity, Involvement, and Hormonal Levels: Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study. Observations of Positive Parenting from Online Parent-Child Interactions at Age 1. Maternal Stress: The First 14 Months Postpartum Measuring Parenting Self-Efficacy from Pregnancy into Early Childhood: Longitudinal Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance Evaluation of a Couple- and Family-Based Intervention: Implications for the Fathering Vulnerability Hypothesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1