Pepper yield according to different types of organic fertilization

Domingos Armando Soquir Jeque, César Pedro, Arsênio Daniel Ivo Mulhanga, Ivan Natividade Júlio Zevo, José Eulário Lampi Dique, Santa Helena Carlitos Rabeca Suagiba, Klinarda Bernardo Viandro, Alcides Mario Charimba
{"title":"Pepper yield according to different types of organic fertilization","authors":"Domingos Armando Soquir Jeque, César Pedro, Arsênio Daniel Ivo Mulhanga, Ivan Natividade Júlio Zevo, José Eulário Lampi Dique, Santa Helena Carlitos Rabeca Suagiba, Klinarda Bernardo Viandro, Alcides Mario Charimba","doi":"10.15406/oajs.2022.05.00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is one of the most economically important vegetables in the world market, being very demanding in terms of soil fertility and, as the soils in Mozambique have, in general, low fertility, organic fertilization is used. To make them compatible with the demands of the culture. The objective of this work was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of fertilization with bovine and swine manure in terms of plant height, plant architecture, number of fruits per plant and fruit production. They were evaluated in an experiment, in the “dry” crop of 2016, at the agricultural research center of the Zambeze University in Tete-Mozambique province. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with three replications and plots of three rows of four meters. From each plot, fifteen plants were measured regarding plant height, number of fruits per plant and fruit production. The data were submitted to statistical processing using Sisvar software, through which normal distribution of data was confirmed, in each variable analysis of variance was performed in the Turkey multiple category test at 5% significance in consideration of the phonological indicators of the culture. The analysis of variance of all parameters evaluated, in the comparison of the averages, there were no significant differences in plant height, number of fruits per plant, and fruit production in both fertilizations, there was a significant difference in the architecture of the plant showing a higher average size when swine manure was applied. From the results shown above, we can infer that fertilization (swine manure) can be one of the alternatives when it is intended to obtain plants with erect architecture, although fruit production for both fertilization is not significant.","PeriodicalId":19581,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/oajs.2022.05.00181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is one of the most economically important vegetables in the world market, being very demanding in terms of soil fertility and, as the soils in Mozambique have, in general, low fertility, organic fertilization is used. To make them compatible with the demands of the culture. The objective of this work was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of fertilization with bovine and swine manure in terms of plant height, plant architecture, number of fruits per plant and fruit production. They were evaluated in an experiment, in the “dry” crop of 2016, at the agricultural research center of the Zambeze University in Tete-Mozambique province. The experiment was carried out in a randomized block design with three replications and plots of three rows of four meters. From each plot, fifteen plants were measured regarding plant height, number of fruits per plant and fruit production. The data were submitted to statistical processing using Sisvar software, through which normal distribution of data was confirmed, in each variable analysis of variance was performed in the Turkey multiple category test at 5% significance in consideration of the phonological indicators of the culture. The analysis of variance of all parameters evaluated, in the comparison of the averages, there were no significant differences in plant height, number of fruits per plant, and fruit production in both fertilizations, there was a significant difference in the architecture of the plant showing a higher average size when swine manure was applied. From the results shown above, we can infer that fertilization (swine manure) can be one of the alternatives when it is intended to obtain plants with erect architecture, although fruit production for both fertilization is not significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辣椒产量根据不同有机肥类型而定
甜椒(Capsicum annuum L.)是世界市场上最重要的经济蔬菜之一,对土壤肥力要求很高,由于莫桑比克的土壤一般肥力较低,因此使用有机施肥。使它们与文化的要求相适应。本研究的目的是评价和比较牛粪和猪粪施肥在植株高度、植株结构、单株果数和果实产量方面的效率。在泰特-莫桑比克省赞比泽大学农业研究中心的一项实验中,他们在2016年的“干旱”作物中进行了评估。试验采用随机区组设计,3个重复,小区3排,每排4米。在每个地块中,测量了15株植株的株高、单株果实数和果实产量。使用Sisvar软件对数据进行统计处理,通过该软件确认数据的正态分布,考虑到培养物的语音指标,在每个变量中采用土耳其多类别检验进行5%显著性方差分析。各参数方差分析结果表明,两种施肥方式在株高、单株果数和产量上均无显著差异,但在株型上有显著差异,施用猪粪处理的株型平均大小较高。从上面显示的结果,我们可以推断,施肥(猪粪)可以作为一种替代方案,当它旨在获得直立结构的植株时,尽管两种施肥的果实产量都不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emancipated women in Cuba: strategies of freedom and motherhood inside of the conflict Educational management and schooling in crisis contexts and regulation Review of malformed frogs Lean manufacturing + healthcare= lean healthcare, a way to optimize efficiency in the healthcare sector Maracatu bodies: some reflections crossing in the light of the Laban/Bartenieff system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1