Expediting the NEPA process via a Document Management System and Virtual GIS-Based NEPA platform

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2017.1359012
Kelly Lyles
{"title":"Expediting the NEPA process via a Document Management System and Virtual GIS-Based NEPA platform","authors":"Kelly Lyles","doi":"10.1080/14660466.2017.1359012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Developing efficient and effective tools for navigating the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process is becoming increasingly important as Federal and State agencies have limited resources (staff and funding) and are required to review and process documents in an expedited fashion. To carry a project through the NEPA process, a skilled team with tools to streamline the interagency review process as well as community input process is highly beneficial. There are numerous approaches to streamlining the NEPA process. This article highlights two potential transformative tools. The tools have not been proven for NEPA application, but they have been successful in other industries. In Fall 2017, the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) is launching a pilot study to test the tool’s effectiveness with respect to NEPA. The first tool is a Document Management System for agency coordination and comment periods to expedite the review and approval time. The second tool is the development of a Virtual NEPA GIS-Based Platform to reduce the number of pages in an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document and improve the transparency of the NEPA process. Too often projects are delayed or over budget as a result of poor coordination processes and lack of transparency during the public review process. This article discusses the importance of and tools to improve project communication, both internally and externally, and the public involvement process.","PeriodicalId":45250,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"139 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14660466.2017.1359012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Developing efficient and effective tools for navigating the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process is becoming increasingly important as Federal and State agencies have limited resources (staff and funding) and are required to review and process documents in an expedited fashion. To carry a project through the NEPA process, a skilled team with tools to streamline the interagency review process as well as community input process is highly beneficial. There are numerous approaches to streamlining the NEPA process. This article highlights two potential transformative tools. The tools have not been proven for NEPA application, but they have been successful in other industries. In Fall 2017, the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) is launching a pilot study to test the tool’s effectiveness with respect to NEPA. The first tool is a Document Management System for agency coordination and comment periods to expedite the review and approval time. The second tool is the development of a Virtual NEPA GIS-Based Platform to reduce the number of pages in an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document and improve the transparency of the NEPA process. Too often projects are delayed or over budget as a result of poor coordination processes and lack of transparency during the public review process. This article discusses the importance of and tools to improve project communication, both internally and externally, and the public involvement process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过文件管理系统和基于虚拟gis的NEPA平台加快NEPA进程
由于联邦和州政府机构的资源(人员和资金)有限,并且需要以快速的方式审查和处理文件,因此开发高效和有效的工具来引导《国家环境政策法》(NEPA)过程变得越来越重要。要使项目顺利通过《国家环境政策法》的程序,一个熟练的团队和工具将使机构间的审查过程和社区的意见过程流程化是非常有益的。有许多方法可以简化《国家环境政策法》的程序。本文重点介绍了两个潜在的变革工具。这些工具还没有被证明适用于NEPA,但它们在其他行业已经取得了成功。2017年秋季,马里兰州交通管理局(MTA)启动了一项试点研究,以测试该工具在NEPA方面的有效性。第一个工具是文件管理系统,用于机构协调和评论期,以加快审查和批准时间。第二个工具是开发基于地理信息系统的《国家环境政策法》虚拟平台,以减少环境评估(EA)和环境影响报告书(EIS)文件的页数,并提高《国家环境政策法》过程的透明度。由于协调过程不佳和公众审查过程缺乏透明度,项目往往被推迟或超出预算。本文讨论了改善项目内部和外部沟通以及公众参与过程的重要性和工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Practice
Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals
期刊最新文献
Anthropological approaches for cultural resource conservation design and planning Cultural resources and landscape conservation design and planning Moving beyond the ecosystem in ecosystem health report cards Food Loss and Food Waste, Causes and Solutions Last issue of Environmental Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1