Rainwater harvesting and conservation tillage increase maize yields in South Africa

J.J. Botha, J.J. Anderson, P.P. Van Staden
{"title":"Rainwater harvesting and conservation tillage increase maize yields in South Africa","authors":"J.J. Botha,&nbsp;J.J. Anderson,&nbsp;P.P. Van Staden","doi":"10.1016/j.wrr.2015.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Poverty and food insecurity are common amongst rural communities in the sub-Saharan African region. The rural population of South Africa<span><span> is not excluded from poverty. With normal conventional tillage practices, crop failures are common on marginal soils in semi-arid areas with low and erratic rainfall. Therefore, selected rural communities in the Eastern Cape, Limpopo and Free State Provinces of South Africa were introduced to appropriate </span>rainwater harvesting and conservation </span></span>agricultural techniques<span> to contribute towards the reduction of food insecurity through improved maize yields. Conventional tillage, no-till, minimum tillage, mechanized basins, in-field rainwater harvesting and the Daling plough were tested in on-station and on-farm field experiments over three to five maize growing seasons (2008/09–2011/13). The rainwater harvesting (in-field rainwater harvesting and Daling plough) and conservation (mechanized basins, no-till and minimum tillage) techniques resulted in slightly higher yields than conventional tillage due to their potential to conserve rainwater better and to harvest additional rainwater. Conventional tillage, no-till and minimum tillage had lower grain yields because they lost on average 18% of the total rainfall to ex-field runoff. The rainwater productivity of the Daling plough treatment was very similar to that of in-field rainwater harvesting, followed by mechanized basins, conventional tillage and no-till or minimum tillage.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101278,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Rural Development","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 66-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2015.04.001","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212608215000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Poverty and food insecurity are common amongst rural communities in the sub-Saharan African region. The rural population of South Africa is not excluded from poverty. With normal conventional tillage practices, crop failures are common on marginal soils in semi-arid areas with low and erratic rainfall. Therefore, selected rural communities in the Eastern Cape, Limpopo and Free State Provinces of South Africa were introduced to appropriate rainwater harvesting and conservation agricultural techniques to contribute towards the reduction of food insecurity through improved maize yields. Conventional tillage, no-till, minimum tillage, mechanized basins, in-field rainwater harvesting and the Daling plough were tested in on-station and on-farm field experiments over three to five maize growing seasons (2008/09–2011/13). The rainwater harvesting (in-field rainwater harvesting and Daling plough) and conservation (mechanized basins, no-till and minimum tillage) techniques resulted in slightly higher yields than conventional tillage due to their potential to conserve rainwater better and to harvest additional rainwater. Conventional tillage, no-till and minimum tillage had lower grain yields because they lost on average 18% of the total rainfall to ex-field runoff. The rainwater productivity of the Daling plough treatment was very similar to that of in-field rainwater harvesting, followed by mechanized basins, conventional tillage and no-till or minimum tillage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雨水收集和保护性耕作提高了南非的玉米产量
贫困和粮食不安全在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的农村社区普遍存在。南非的农村人口并没有被排除在贫困之外。在降雨量少且不稳定的半干旱地区的边缘土壤上,采用常规耕作方法,作物歉收很常见。因此,向南非东开普省、林波波省和自由邦省的选定农村社区介绍了适当的雨水收集和保护性农业技术,通过提高玉米产量为减少粮食不安全作出贡献。在3 ~ 5个玉米生长季节(2008/09-2011/13),对常规耕作、免耕、少耕、机械化流域、田间雨水收集和大岭犁进行了站内和田间试验。雨水收集(田间雨水收集和大岭犁)和养护(机械化盆地、免耕和少耕)技术的产量略高于传统耕作,因为它们具有更好地保存雨水和收集额外雨水的潜力。常规耕作、免耕和少耕的粮食产量较低,因为它们平均损失了总降雨量的18%。大岭犁处理的雨水生产力与田间集雨非常相似,其次是机械化流域、常规耕作和免耕或少耕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring water security and water demand determinants in rural areas. The case of canton Cotacachi in Ecuador Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh A critical mass analysis of community-based financing of water services in rural Kenya Comparison of informal rainwater harvesting systems to conventional water sources in terms of microbiological water quality The economic contribution of a recreational fishery in a remote rural economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1