Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh

Mohammad Monirul Hasan, Nicolas Gerber
{"title":"Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh","authors":"Mohammad Monirul Hasan,&nbsp;Nicolas Gerber","doi":"10.1016/j.wrr.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the impacts of access to piped water on drinking water quality, sanitation, hygiene and health outcomes in marginalized rural households of north-western Bangladesh, using a quasi-experimental setup. A government organization – the Barindra Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) – established a piped water network to connect rural households with the deep ground water resources and improve their access to potable water. Using propensity score matching, the study compares a treatment and a control group of households to identify gains in water-sanitation, hygiene and health outcomes. In terms of water safety, we find no improvement in the quality of drinking water, measured by <em>E. coli</em> count per 100 ml of water at the point of use (i.e. the pots and jars used to store it). Food utensils tested positive for <em>E. coli</em> in both the control and treatment group, thus showing no improvement through the BMDA intervention. Hygiene behavior such as handwashing with soap after defecation or before feeding children also does not improve. Finally, we do not find evidence of health benefits, such as decreased diarrhea incidence of under-five children or improved nutritional outcomes such as stunting, underweight and wasting. Although access to BMDA piped water in the premises is subject to a fee, it seems this incentive mechanism is not strong enough to improve water behavior or its outcomes: treated households are as poor as the non-treated in terms of maintaining hygiene and water quality, possibly because of lack of information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101278,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Rural Development","volume":"10 ","pages":"Pages 33-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2018.10.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212608216300493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We investigate the impacts of access to piped water on drinking water quality, sanitation, hygiene and health outcomes in marginalized rural households of north-western Bangladesh, using a quasi-experimental setup. A government organization – the Barindra Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA) – established a piped water network to connect rural households with the deep ground water resources and improve their access to potable water. Using propensity score matching, the study compares a treatment and a control group of households to identify gains in water-sanitation, hygiene and health outcomes. In terms of water safety, we find no improvement in the quality of drinking water, measured by E. coli count per 100 ml of water at the point of use (i.e. the pots and jars used to store it). Food utensils tested positive for E. coli in both the control and treatment group, thus showing no improvement through the BMDA intervention. Hygiene behavior such as handwashing with soap after defecation or before feeding children also does not improve. Finally, we do not find evidence of health benefits, such as decreased diarrhea incidence of under-five children or improved nutritional outcomes such as stunting, underweight and wasting. Although access to BMDA piped water in the premises is subject to a fee, it seems this incentive mechanism is not strong enough to improve water behavior or its outcomes: treated households are as poor as the non-treated in terms of maintaining hygiene and water quality, possibly because of lack of information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮用水和食品器具的细菌污染:孟加拉国西北部自来水对儿童健康的影响
我们使用准实验设置,调查了孟加拉国西北部边缘化农村家庭获得自来水对饮用水质量、环境卫生、个人卫生和健康结果的影响。一个政府组织——巴林德拉多用途发展局(BMDA)——建立了一个管道供水网络,将农村家庭与深层地下水资源连接起来,并改善了他们获得饮用水的机会。利用倾向得分匹配,该研究比较了治疗组和控制组的家庭,以确定在水卫生、个人卫生和健康结果方面的收益。在水安全方面,我们发现饮用水的质量没有改善,以使用点(即用于储存水的锅和罐)每100 毫升水的大肠杆菌计数来衡量。在对照组和实验组中,食品器具的大肠杆菌检测呈阳性,因此BMDA干预并没有改善。排便后或喂食前用肥皂洗手等卫生行为也没有改善。最后,我们没有发现健康益处的证据,例如减少五岁以下儿童腹泻发病率或改善营养状况,如发育迟缓、体重不足和消瘦。虽然使用BMDA的自来水需要付费,但这种激励机制似乎不足以改善用水行为或其结果:在保持卫生和水质方面,接受过治疗的家庭与未接受治疗的家庭一样贫穷,可能是因为缺乏信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring water security and water demand determinants in rural areas. The case of canton Cotacachi in Ecuador Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh A critical mass analysis of community-based financing of water services in rural Kenya Comparison of informal rainwater harvesting systems to conventional water sources in terms of microbiological water quality The economic contribution of a recreational fishery in a remote rural economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1