Correlation analysis of the SPAD readings and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) under different agrotechnical conditions

P. Pepó
{"title":"Correlation analysis of the SPAD readings and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) under different agrotechnical conditions","authors":"P. Pepó","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.20.14.05.p2124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We studied the effect of planting method (flat and ridge planting) and row spacing (0.75-1.0 m) on the yield and SPAD readings of sweet potato (Ásotthalmi 12 variety) in a small-plot field experiment in 2017 and 2018. The experiment was set up in lattice design with 4 replications. The SPAD readings of sweet potato were measured four (2017) and three (2018) times during vegetation period (by Konica Minolta 502). A high yield level was reached both in 2017 (23.23-50.69 t ha-1 marketable yield) and 2018 (33.26-47.34 t ha-1) due to the effects of the favourable soil (chernozem), the near-optimal agrotechnical background, irrigation and the warmer-than-average vegetation period. In both years, higher yields were obtained with flat planting and 0.75 m row spacing. The proportion of non-marketable tubers was between 9.97-15.57% in 2017 and 8.65-11.01% in 2018. The SPADmax values were measured in July (39.61-50.31 in 2017) and in August (49.90-55.33 in 2018). Strong correlation observed among SPAD readings, the whole yield and the marketable yield in both years (r = 0.632*, r = -0.664* and r = 0.709**, respectively). Also, a strong correlation was observed between the planting method and the obtained SPAD readings (r = -0.847**, -0.682* in 2017 and r = -0.634*, -0.488 in 2018, respectively), while there was no correlation between row spacing and SPAD readings (r = -0.006NS-0.190NS). Crop year had a strong effect on SPAD readings (r = 0.639**-0.871**).","PeriodicalId":10925,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, May 06, 2020","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, May 06, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.05.p2124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We studied the effect of planting method (flat and ridge planting) and row spacing (0.75-1.0 m) on the yield and SPAD readings of sweet potato (Ásotthalmi 12 variety) in a small-plot field experiment in 2017 and 2018. The experiment was set up in lattice design with 4 replications. The SPAD readings of sweet potato were measured four (2017) and three (2018) times during vegetation period (by Konica Minolta 502). A high yield level was reached both in 2017 (23.23-50.69 t ha-1 marketable yield) and 2018 (33.26-47.34 t ha-1) due to the effects of the favourable soil (chernozem), the near-optimal agrotechnical background, irrigation and the warmer-than-average vegetation period. In both years, higher yields were obtained with flat planting and 0.75 m row spacing. The proportion of non-marketable tubers was between 9.97-15.57% in 2017 and 8.65-11.01% in 2018. The SPADmax values were measured in July (39.61-50.31 in 2017) and in August (49.90-55.33 in 2018). Strong correlation observed among SPAD readings, the whole yield and the marketable yield in both years (r = 0.632*, r = -0.664* and r = 0.709**, respectively). Also, a strong correlation was observed between the planting method and the obtained SPAD readings (r = -0.847**, -0.682* in 2017 and r = -0.634*, -0.488 in 2018, respectively), while there was no correlation between row spacing and SPAD readings (r = -0.006NS-0.190NS). Crop year had a strong effect on SPAD readings (r = 0.639**-0.871**).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同农业技术条件下甘薯SPAD指数与产量的相关分析
在2017年和2018年的小块大田试验中,研究了种植方式(平垄作)和行距(0.75 ~ 1.0 m)对甘薯(Ásotthalmi 12个品种)产量和SPAD指数的影响。试验采用格子设计,设4个重复。甘薯的SPAD读数在植被期测量了四次(2017年)和三次(2018年)(柯尼卡美能达502)。2017年(23.23 ~ 50.69 t hm -1)和2018年(33.26 ~ 47.34 t hm -1)均达到高产水平,这是由于有利土壤(黑土)、接近最佳的农业技术背景、灌溉和高于平均水平的植被期的影响。在这两年中,平植和0.75 m行距获得了较高的产量。非市场块茎占比2017年为9.97-15.57%,2018年为8.65-11.01%。SPADmax值分别为7月(2017年为39.61 ~ 50.31)和8月(2018年为49.90 ~ 55.33)。两年SPAD读数与总产量、可售产量均呈较强相关性(r = 0.632*、r = -0.664*、r = 0.709**)。种植方式与SPAD值呈显著正相关(r = -0.847**, -0.682* *, r = -0.634*, -0.488 *),行距与SPAD值无显著正相关(r = -0.006NS-0.190NS)。作物年份对SPAD的影响较大(r = 0.639**-0.871**)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alternative “green” lime kiln fuels: Part II—Woody biomass, bio-oils, gasification, and hydrogen Effects of a PFI refiner’s operational parameters on the swellability of recycled fiber Fundamental understanding of removal of liquid thin film trapped between fibers in the paper drying process: A microscopic approach Alternative “green” lime kiln fuels: Part I—Pulping/recovery byproducts Demanda de electricidad residencial: Una perspectiva de regresión cuantílica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1