THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF LINGUISTIC THEORY: البنية المنطقية للنظرية اللسانية: ستيفن ر. أندرسون، جامعة ييل

Ranya Ahmed Rashid Shaheen, Abdelrahman Mudawi Abdelrahi Ranya Ahmed Rashid Shaheen, Abdelrahman Mudawi Abd
{"title":"THE LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF LINGUISTIC THEORY: البنية المنطقية للنظرية اللسانية: ستيفن ر. أندرسون، جامعة ييل","authors":"Ranya Ahmed Rashid Shaheen, Abdelrahman Mudawi Abdelrahi Ranya Ahmed Rashid Shaheen, Abdelrahman Mudawi Abd","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.r090521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of inquiry in Linguistics is the human ability to acquire and use a natural language, and the goal of linguistic theory is an explicit characterization of that ability. Looking at the communicative abilities of other species, it becomes clear that our linguistic ability is specific to our species, undoubtedly a product of our biology. But how do we go about determining the specifics of this Language faculty? _here are two primary ways in which we infer the nature of Language from the properties of individual languages: arguments from the Poverty of the Stimulus, and the search for universals that characterize every natural language. Arguments of the first sort are not easy to construct (though not as difficult as sometimes suggested), and apply only to a tiny part of Language as a whole. Arguments from universals or typological generalizations are also quite problematic. In phonology, morphology, and syntax, factors of historical development, functional underpinnings, limitations of the learning situation, among others conspire to compromise the explanatory value of arguments from observed cross-linguistic regularities. Confounding the situation is the likelihood that properties found across languages as a consequence of such external forces have been incorporated into the Language faculty evolutionarily through the ‘Baldwin Effect.’ _e conflict between the biologically based specificity of the human Language faculty and the difficulty of establishing most of its properties in a secure way cannot, however, be avoided by ignoring or denying the reality of either of its poles.","PeriodicalId":32779,"journal":{"name":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizoram University Journal of Humanities Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.r090521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of inquiry in Linguistics is the human ability to acquire and use a natural language, and the goal of linguistic theory is an explicit characterization of that ability. Looking at the communicative abilities of other species, it becomes clear that our linguistic ability is specific to our species, undoubtedly a product of our biology. But how do we go about determining the specifics of this Language faculty? _here are two primary ways in which we infer the nature of Language from the properties of individual languages: arguments from the Poverty of the Stimulus, and the search for universals that characterize every natural language. Arguments of the first sort are not easy to construct (though not as difficult as sometimes suggested), and apply only to a tiny part of Language as a whole. Arguments from universals or typological generalizations are also quite problematic. In phonology, morphology, and syntax, factors of historical development, functional underpinnings, limitations of the learning situation, among others conspire to compromise the explanatory value of arguments from observed cross-linguistic regularities. Confounding the situation is the likelihood that properties found across languages as a consequence of such external forces have been incorporated into the Language faculty evolutionarily through the ‘Baldwin Effect.’ _e conflict between the biologically based specificity of the human Language faculty and the difficulty of establishing most of its properties in a secure way cannot, however, be avoided by ignoring or denying the reality of either of its poles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类理论的逻辑结构:斯蒂芬·r。耶鲁大学安德森
语言学研究的对象是人类习得和使用自然语言的能力,而语言学理论的目标是对这种能力的明确描述。看看其他物种的交流能力,很明显,我们的语言能力是我们物种特有的,毫无疑问,这是我们生物学的产物。但是我们如何确定语言能力的具体特征呢?以下是我们从个别语言的特性中推断语言本质的两种主要方式:从刺激的匮乏中得出的论证,以及寻找表征每种自然语言的共相。第一种论证不容易构造(虽然不像有时认为的那样困难),而且只适用于语言整体的一小部分。来自共相或类型学概括的论证也很有问题。在音韵学、词法和句法方面,历史发展的因素、功能基础、学习情况的限制,以及其他因素共同影响了从观察到的跨语言规律中得出的论证的解释价值。令人困惑的是,由于这种外部力量的结果,跨语言发现的特性可能已经通过“鲍德温效应”进化地融入了语言能力。然而,忽视或否认人类语言能力的任何一个极点的现实,都无法避免人类语言能力基于生物学的特殊性与以一种安全的方式建立其大部分特性的困难之间的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
of Discretion Assessment of spatial suitability of ecotourism sites in Al-Ahsa governorate, Saudi Arabia, by using GIS: تقييم الملاءمة المكانية لمواقع السياحة البيئية في محافظة الأحساء بالمملكة العربية السعودية باستخدام نظم المعلومات الجغرافية Urban growth trends in city of Taif Analyzed with geographical information systems: اتجاهات النمو العمراني بمدينة الطائف باستخدام نظم المعلومات الجغرافية Dialogue Discourse and Ideology of Popular Superstition: The Omani short story as a model: الخطاب الحواري وإيديولوجية الفكر الخرافي الشعبي: القصة القصيرة العُمانية نموذجًا Methods of Using Twitter in Marketing the Activities of Public Relations Departments in the Saudi Airline Market: أساليب استخدام تويتر في الأنشطة التسويقية لإدارات العلاقات العامة بسوق الطيران السعودي
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1