Assessing a New Medical School in Zambia Using Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measurement: A cross-sectional study

C. Ezeala, M. Ezeala, W. Zimba
{"title":"Assessing a New Medical School in Zambia Using Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measurement: A cross-sectional study","authors":"C. Ezeala, M. Ezeala, W. Zimba","doi":"10.55320/mjz.49.3.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Learners’ perception of learning environment reflects educational program’s effectiveness. For new medical schools, determining effectiveness of teaching and learning is desirable quality assurance process. \nAim: To determine pioneer medical students’ perception of learning environment of a new school using Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measurement (DREEM). \nMethods: Quantitative cross-sectional study design was adopted. Consenting medical students in second and third years of Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery degree program were surveyed with a questionnaire comprising a demographic competent and 50 DREEM items. Non-probability sampling was adopted. Completed questionnaires were sorted and rated. The resulting quantitative data were analysed for mean scores with SPSS 21 software. Mean total scores and mean scores in five subscales were determined. Scores on individual items were also analysed. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess dataset reliability. \nResults: The study recorded 137 participants, 54.2 % females and 45.8 % males. Mean age was 22 (± 4.03) years. Mean total DREEM score was 117.5 (58.8 %) and interpreted as “more positive than negative.” Scores in subscales of perception of learning, perception of teachers, academic self-perception, and perception of atmosphere, were positive with mean scores of 62.9 %, 60.2 %, 63.4 %, and 55.6, respectively. Subscale of social self-perception rated poorly with mean score of 48.9 % and interpreted as “not a nice place.” Single items revealed five major problem areas: lack of adequate support, authoritarian leadership, over-emphasis on factual learning, poor memorizing, and excessive stress. \nConclusion: This analysis revealed major problems and weaknesses in the new school and addressing them could improve educational quality.","PeriodicalId":74149,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Zambia","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Zambia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55320/mjz.49.3.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Learners’ perception of learning environment reflects educational program’s effectiveness. For new medical schools, determining effectiveness of teaching and learning is desirable quality assurance process. Aim: To determine pioneer medical students’ perception of learning environment of a new school using Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measurement (DREEM). Methods: Quantitative cross-sectional study design was adopted. Consenting medical students in second and third years of Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery degree program were surveyed with a questionnaire comprising a demographic competent and 50 DREEM items. Non-probability sampling was adopted. Completed questionnaires were sorted and rated. The resulting quantitative data were analysed for mean scores with SPSS 21 software. Mean total scores and mean scores in five subscales were determined. Scores on individual items were also analysed. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess dataset reliability. Results: The study recorded 137 participants, 54.2 % females and 45.8 % males. Mean age was 22 (± 4.03) years. Mean total DREEM score was 117.5 (58.8 %) and interpreted as “more positive than negative.” Scores in subscales of perception of learning, perception of teachers, academic self-perception, and perception of atmosphere, were positive with mean scores of 62.9 %, 60.2 %, 63.4 %, and 55.6, respectively. Subscale of social self-perception rated poorly with mean score of 48.9 % and interpreted as “not a nice place.” Single items revealed five major problem areas: lack of adequate support, authoritarian leadership, over-emphasis on factual learning, poor memorizing, and excessive stress. Conclusion: This analysis revealed major problems and weaknesses in the new school and addressing them could improve educational quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用邓迪就绪教育环境测量评估赞比亚一所新医学院:一项横断面研究
背景:学习者对学习环境的感知反映了教育计划的有效性。对于新成立的医学院来说,确定教与学的有效性是一个理想的质量保证过程。目的:采用邓迪教育环境测量法(DREEM),了解医科先锋学生对新学校学习环境的感知情况。方法:采用定量横断面研究设计。对医学和外科学士学位课程二年级和三年级同意的医学生进行问卷调查,问卷包括人口统计能力和50个DREEM项目。采用非概率抽样。对完成的问卷进行分类和评分。用SPSS 21软件对所得定量数据进行平均分分析。计算平均总分和五个分量表的平均得分。对个别项目的得分也进行了分析。Cronbach’s alpha用于评估数据集的可靠性。结果:研究记录了137名参与者,其中54.2%为女性,45.8%为男性。平均年龄22(±4.03)岁。DREEM平均总分为117.5分(58.8%),被解释为“阳性多于阴性”。学习知觉、教师知觉、学术自我知觉、氛围知觉各分量表得分均为正,平均得分分别为62.9%、60.2%、63.4%、55.6%。社会自我知觉子量表得分较低,平均得分为48.9%,被解释为“不是个好地方”。单个项目揭示了五个主要问题领域:缺乏足够的支持,专制领导,过分强调事实学习,记忆力差,压力过大。结论:分析揭示了新学校存在的主要问题和不足,解决这些问题可以提高教育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Workplace experiences of diagnostic radiographers, on job satisfaction and staff retention in the public health sector in Lusaka District of Zambia Role Development and Extension for Radiographers in Computed Tomography: Literature Review Findings and their Application to Zimbabwe Role of Radiographers in the Provision of Diagnostic Medical Ultrasound Services in Zimbabwe: Past, Present and Way Forward Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of premature coronary artery disease; a case report of a 34-year-old male patient presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Gastrointestinal malignancies in Zambia: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1