The Han Imaginaire of Writing as Weaving: Intertextuality and the Huainanzi's Self-Fashioning as an Embodiment of the Way

{"title":"The Han Imaginaire of Writing as Weaving: Intertextuality and the Huainanzi's Self-Fashioning as an Embodiment of the Way","authors":"Tobias Benedikt Zürn","doi":"10.1017/S0021911819001906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writers in the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) apparently experienced writing in weaving terms. Such an imaginaire of writing as weaving was probably fully manifested in the first or second century BCE and crystallized in the coining of literary terminologies such as classics (jing), weft-writings (weishu), and literature/texts (wen). Situating the Huainanzi and its intertextual writing practice within this imaginaire enables us to reassess both the Huainanzi's widespread dismissal as a miscellaneous, encyclopedic behemoth in the first half of the twentieth century and its reappreciation over the last few decades. According to the Huainanzi's self-depictions, Liu An and his erudite courtiers apparently created the scripture in such an intertextual way in order to textually mimic the process of weaving. Since the Huainanzi commonly associates weaving with the Way's connective powers, the text's extraordinary design might be the result of a literary attempt to create an efficacious, textual artifact that embodies the Way by incorporating the act of weaving in its textual design.","PeriodicalId":33524,"journal":{"name":"IKAT The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"72 1","pages":"367 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IKAT The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911819001906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Writers in the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) apparently experienced writing in weaving terms. Such an imaginaire of writing as weaving was probably fully manifested in the first or second century BCE and crystallized in the coining of literary terminologies such as classics (jing), weft-writings (weishu), and literature/texts (wen). Situating the Huainanzi and its intertextual writing practice within this imaginaire enables us to reassess both the Huainanzi's widespread dismissal as a miscellaneous, encyclopedic behemoth in the first half of the twentieth century and its reappreciation over the last few decades. According to the Huainanzi's self-depictions, Liu An and his erudite courtiers apparently created the scripture in such an intertextual way in order to textually mimic the process of weaving. Since the Huainanzi commonly associates weaving with the Way's connective powers, the text's extraordinary design might be the result of a literary attempt to create an efficacious, textual artifact that embodies the Way by incorporating the act of weaving in its textual design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汉人的织布想象:互文性与淮南子的自我塑造
汉代(公元前206年-公元220年)的作家显然有过用编织术语写作的经验。这种对文字的想象,如编织,可能在公元前一世纪或公元前二世纪得到充分体现,并在诸如经典(经)、纬书(纬)和文学/文本(文)等文学术语的创造中得到具体化。将《淮南子》及其互文写作实践置于这一想象之中,使我们能够重新评估《淮南子》在20世纪上半叶被普遍视为杂七杂八、百科全书式的庞然大物的情况,以及过去几十年对它的重新欣赏。根据淮南子的自我描述,刘安和他的博学多才的臣子显然是以这种互文的方式创作经文的,目的是在文本上模仿编织的过程。由于淮南子通常将编织与“道”的连接力量联系在一起,因此,文本的非凡设计可能是一种文学尝试的结果,即通过将编织行为纳入其文本设计中,创造一种有效的、体现“道”的文本人工制品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Peach Blossom Fan Sonic Mobilities: Producing Worlds in Southern China Transnational Hallyu: The Globalization of Korean Digital and Popular Culture Disunion: Anticommunist Nationalism and the Making of the Republic of Vietnam Editorial Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1