NOISE IN INDONESIAN URBAN AREAS: RULES AND FACTS

IF 0.6 0 ARCHITECTURE Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI:10.3846/jau.2022.16367
C. E. Mediastika, A. Sudarsono, S. Utami, I. Fitri, R. Drastiani, M. I. R. Winandari, Akbar Rahman, A. Kusno, N. Mustika, Y. B. Mberu, R. Yanti, Z. A. Rachman
{"title":"NOISE IN INDONESIAN URBAN AREAS: RULES AND FACTS","authors":"C. E. Mediastika, A. Sudarsono, S. Utami, I. Fitri, R. Drastiani, M. I. R. Winandari, Akbar Rahman, A. Kusno, N. Mustika, Y. B. Mberu, R. Yanti, Z. A. Rachman","doi":"10.3846/jau.2022.16367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irresponsible noise management by the concerned authorities and society’s indifference has made noise in Indonesian urban areas a nightmare. The current noise regulation in Indonesia, which define 55 dB(A) as the lowest permissible noise level generated in residential areas, is outdated. This study investigates how urban communities reacted to the implementation of this outdated regulation. Data was collected by searching online open sources for noise-related keywords used in public complaints, court cases, authority campaigns, etc. The collected data was then plotted in an Excel sheet to create a modest statistical trend, and the detailed information on how the government and court ruled the case was treated as a transcript to be analysed qualitatively. The study results are to be compared and discussed with noise facts of those in more advanced countries. The discussion shows that the noise case in Indonesia is significantly minor compared to other countries with similar populations. Noisemakers were reported to have won in 44% of noise complaints that went to court. This may be the reason for the Indonesians’ apathy toward the settlement of noise-related complaints by the city government and the fairness of tribunal processes.","PeriodicalId":53978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Architecture and Urbanism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2022.16367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irresponsible noise management by the concerned authorities and society’s indifference has made noise in Indonesian urban areas a nightmare. The current noise regulation in Indonesia, which define 55 dB(A) as the lowest permissible noise level generated in residential areas, is outdated. This study investigates how urban communities reacted to the implementation of this outdated regulation. Data was collected by searching online open sources for noise-related keywords used in public complaints, court cases, authority campaigns, etc. The collected data was then plotted in an Excel sheet to create a modest statistical trend, and the detailed information on how the government and court ruled the case was treated as a transcript to be analysed qualitatively. The study results are to be compared and discussed with noise facts of those in more advanced countries. The discussion shows that the noise case in Indonesia is significantly minor compared to other countries with similar populations. Noisemakers were reported to have won in 44% of noise complaints that went to court. This may be the reason for the Indonesians’ apathy toward the settlement of noise-related complaints by the city government and the fairness of tribunal processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚城市地区的噪音:规则和事实
有关当局不负责任的噪音管理和社会的漠不关心使印度尼西亚城市地区的噪音成为一场噩梦。印度尼西亚目前的噪音规定将55分贝(A)定义为住宅区产生的最低允许噪音水平,这已经过时了。本研究调查了城市社区对这一过时规定的实施的反应。数据是通过在网上公开资源中搜索公众投诉、法庭案件、权威活动等中使用的与噪声相关的关键词来收集的。然后将收集到的数据绘制在Excel表格中,以创建一个适度的统计趋势,并将有关政府和法院如何裁决此案的详细信息作为文本进行定性分析。研究结果将与发达国家的噪音事实进行比较和讨论。讨论表明,与其他人口相似的国家相比,印度尼西亚的噪音情况明显较小。据报道,在向法院提起的噪音投诉中,噪音制造者在44%的案件中获胜。这可能是印尼人对市政府解决与噪音有关的投诉和法庭程序的公正性漠不关心的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Architecture and Urbanism publishes original research on all aspects of urban architecture.
期刊最新文献
A CITY SHAPED BY MODERNIST ARCHITECTURE: SÜMERBANK TEXTILE (COTTON) PRINTING FACTORY AND ITS WORKER SETTLEMENTS THE DIVIDED BRAIN AND WAYS OF BUILDING THE WORLD: PARALLELS IN THE THOUGHT OF IAIN MCGILCHRIST AND CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER THE IMPACT OF MATERIAL AND CRAFTING TECHNOLOGY ON THE SHAPING AND DESIGN OF WROUGHT IRON ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS READING THE PAST: ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF PREVALENT PANDEMICS ON CITIES THE LOST OF OLD DEMAK SULTANATE CITY PATTERN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1