Book Reviews / Compte Rendus: American Catholics and the Church of Tomorrow: Building Churches for the Future, 1925–1975, Catherine R. Osborne

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/00084298211064843
John R. Williams
{"title":"Book Reviews / Compte Rendus: American Catholics and the Church of Tomorrow: Building Churches for the Future, 1925–1975, Catherine R. Osborne","authors":"John R. Williams","doi":"10.1177/00084298211064843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature on policing in Canada is well developed, but under-populated by law scholars. Kent Roach, our most accomplished scholar of criminal law and public policy, has intervened in current debates about policing by offering something unique—a work that surveys four decades of inquiries and commissions, special investigations, case law, and legislation to render an extensive overview of Canadian policing that seeks to shed equal light on legal, political, and social facets of the subject. He concludes that policing here “needs to become less violent and discriminatory, better governed, and more effective” (p. 1). He offers overwhelming evidence for a decades-long prevalence of the over-policing of Indigenous, Black, and other minorities in Canada and a grossly disproportionate amount of police violence—often shocking in nature—against minorities in recent decades, with no sign of abating. His most pointed criticism targets the failure of civilian boards and councils to effectively govern and oversee police conduct due to an erroneous belief that only police can decide “operational matters.” Many illusions about policing here being better than in theUnited States—or not as bad—are dispelled. Notmuch hope for change is offered. Roachmakes his case for the “vicious circle of overpolicing and underprotection” (p. 25) by canvassing a lengthy history of inquiries and investigations into police violence, most involving racialized victims, women, and, more recently, Muslim Canadians—with countless recommendations ignored and forgotten, only to be reprised in later commissions. Another chapter looks at failures to impose accountability on police or to effectively reduce violent and abusive conduct. In one of the more striking passages in the book, Roach traces the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Golden, a case in which the Court refused to impose a warrant requirement for strip searches, instead setting out a series of guidelines. Three years later, Toronto police were “strip searching 37.4% of themore than 61,000 people they arrested” (p. 57). By 2015, this had increased to 40% of all arrests, a disproportionate number ofwhomwere Black, Brown, or Indigenous.Deadly shootings by police have continued to increase in the past two decades, rising sharply in 2021—also involving a disproportionate number of racialized deceased.","PeriodicalId":43595,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN RELIGION-SCIENCES RELIGIEUSES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298211064843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature on policing in Canada is well developed, but under-populated by law scholars. Kent Roach, our most accomplished scholar of criminal law and public policy, has intervened in current debates about policing by offering something unique—a work that surveys four decades of inquiries and commissions, special investigations, case law, and legislation to render an extensive overview of Canadian policing that seeks to shed equal light on legal, political, and social facets of the subject. He concludes that policing here “needs to become less violent and discriminatory, better governed, and more effective” (p. 1). He offers overwhelming evidence for a decades-long prevalence of the over-policing of Indigenous, Black, and other minorities in Canada and a grossly disproportionate amount of police violence—often shocking in nature—against minorities in recent decades, with no sign of abating. His most pointed criticism targets the failure of civilian boards and councils to effectively govern and oversee police conduct due to an erroneous belief that only police can decide “operational matters.” Many illusions about policing here being better than in theUnited States—or not as bad—are dispelled. Notmuch hope for change is offered. Roachmakes his case for the “vicious circle of overpolicing and underprotection” (p. 25) by canvassing a lengthy history of inquiries and investigations into police violence, most involving racialized victims, women, and, more recently, Muslim Canadians—with countless recommendations ignored and forgotten, only to be reprised in later commissions. Another chapter looks at failures to impose accountability on police or to effectively reduce violent and abusive conduct. In one of the more striking passages in the book, Roach traces the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Golden, a case in which the Court refused to impose a warrant requirement for strip searches, instead setting out a series of guidelines. Three years later, Toronto police were “strip searching 37.4% of themore than 61,000 people they arrested” (p. 57). By 2015, this had increased to 40% of all arrests, a disproportionate number ofwhomwere Black, Brown, or Indigenous.Deadly shootings by police have continued to increase in the past two decades, rising sharply in 2021—also involving a disproportionate number of racialized deceased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《美国天主教徒和明天的教会:建设未来的教会,1925-1975》,凯瑟琳·r·奥斯本著
在加拿大,关于警务的文献很发达,但法律学者却很少。肯特·罗奇,我们在刑法和公共政策方面最有成就的学者,通过提供一些独特的东西介入了当前关于警务的辩论——他的作品调查了四十年来的调查和委员会、特别调查、判例法和立法,对加拿大警务进行了广泛的概述,试图从法律、政治和社会等方面对这一主题进行平等的阐述。他的结论是,这里的警察“需要减少暴力和歧视,更好地管理,更有效”(第1页)。他提供了压倒性的证据,证明几十年来加拿大对土著、黑人和其他少数民族的过度监管普遍存在,以及近几十年来对少数民族的警察暴力严重不成比例——通常是令人震惊的——没有减弱的迹象。他最尖锐的批评是,由于错误地认为只有警察才能决定“行动事项”,民间委员会和委员会未能有效地管理和监督警察的行为。许多关于这里的治安比美国好或者没有美国差的幻想都破灭了。改变的希望不大。罗奇通过查阅对警察暴力的长期调查和调查历史(大多数涉及种族受害者、妇女,以及最近的加拿大穆斯林)来论证“过度监管和保护不足的恶性循环”(第25页),无数的建议被忽视和遗忘,只是在后来的委员会中被重复。另一章着眼于未能对警察施加问责或有效减少暴力和虐待行为。在书中最引人注目的段落之一,罗奇追溯了2001年最高法院对戈尔登案判决的影响,在该案中,最高法院拒绝强制要求脱衣搜查,而是制定了一系列指导方针。三年后,多伦多警方“在他们逮捕的61,000多人中,脱衣搜身的占37.4%”(第57页)。到2015年,这一比例上升到40%,其中不成比例的是黑人、棕色人种和土著居民。过去二十年来,警察开枪致死的案件持续增加,在2021年急剧增加,死者中也有不成比例的种族化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses is a peer-reviewed, bilingual academic quarterly, serving scholars who work in a wide range of sub-fields in religious studies and theological studies. It publishes scholarly articles of interest to specialists, but written so as to be intelligible to other scholars who wish to keep informed of current scholarship. It also features articles that focus, in a timely and critically reflective manner, on intellectual, professional and institutional issues in the scholarly study of religion, as well as notices that inform scholars of activities and developments in religious studies and theological studies across Canada and throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
The otherwise and grace: Exploring theopolitical connections. The state, the gods and the imagination; or, David Graeber as a theorist of religion Compte rendu / Book Review: Les violences sexuelles dans l’Église. Retour sur les travaux de la CIASE Compte rendu / Book Review: La fin de la culture religieuse. Chronique d’une disparition annoncée Book Review / Compte rendu: Beyond Doubt: The Secularization of Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1