A review of epidemiological studies on cancer in relation to the use of anti-ulcer drugs.

C. L. Vecchia, A. Tavani
{"title":"A review of epidemiological studies on cancer in relation to the use of anti-ulcer drugs.","authors":"C. L. Vecchia, A. Tavani","doi":"10.1097/00008469-200204000-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H2-receptor antagonists have been widely used since the late 1970s for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers and other benign conditions of the stomach, oesophagus and duodenum. Several case reports suggested that long-term therapy with H2-receptor antagonists, mainly cimetidine and ranitidine, might increase the risk of gastric cancer. After early case reports, at least six analytical epidemiological studies (two cohort and four case-control) were published, including a total of about 1000 cases of gastric cancer. The relative risks (RR) were systematically and substantially elevated in the first year since starting H2-receptor antagonist use, and levelled off in the following years. Some excess risk was still apparent during the first 5 years of drug use, probably due to incorrect diagnosis and treatment of pre-existing neoplastic gastric lesions, but the estimated RR was not above unity for > or = 10 years since starting drug treatment in the two studies including information on long-term use. The findings of analytical epidemiological studies are thus consistent with the absence of a causal association between H2-receptor antagonist use and gastric cancer risk. Data on oesophageal and colorectal cancer do not support a relevant relation between cimetidine use and the risk of these neoplasms. With reference to total cancer mortality, in a Danish cohort study, for males the RR was 1.9 in the first year, and 1.4 in the first 5 years; corresponding values for females were 1.7 and 1.5. In a British cohort study, the RR was 3.4 in the first year, and 1.3 in the years 2-10. The excess risk in the first year was essentially due to gastric cancer. Post-marketing surveillance data for omeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors are much scantier than for H2-receptor antagonists, particularly on long-term use.","PeriodicalId":11950,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200204000-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

H2-receptor antagonists have been widely used since the late 1970s for the treatment of gastrointestinal ulcers and other benign conditions of the stomach, oesophagus and duodenum. Several case reports suggested that long-term therapy with H2-receptor antagonists, mainly cimetidine and ranitidine, might increase the risk of gastric cancer. After early case reports, at least six analytical epidemiological studies (two cohort and four case-control) were published, including a total of about 1000 cases of gastric cancer. The relative risks (RR) were systematically and substantially elevated in the first year since starting H2-receptor antagonist use, and levelled off in the following years. Some excess risk was still apparent during the first 5 years of drug use, probably due to incorrect diagnosis and treatment of pre-existing neoplastic gastric lesions, but the estimated RR was not above unity for > or = 10 years since starting drug treatment in the two studies including information on long-term use. The findings of analytical epidemiological studies are thus consistent with the absence of a causal association between H2-receptor antagonist use and gastric cancer risk. Data on oesophageal and colorectal cancer do not support a relevant relation between cimetidine use and the risk of these neoplasms. With reference to total cancer mortality, in a Danish cohort study, for males the RR was 1.9 in the first year, and 1.4 in the first 5 years; corresponding values for females were 1.7 and 1.5. In a British cohort study, the RR was 3.4 in the first year, and 1.3 in the years 2-10. The excess risk in the first year was essentially due to gastric cancer. Post-marketing surveillance data for omeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors are much scantier than for H2-receptor antagonists, particularly on long-term use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗溃疡药物使用与癌症流行病学研究综述。
自20世纪70年代末以来,h2受体拮抗剂被广泛用于治疗胃肠道溃疡和其他胃、食管和十二指肠的良性疾病。一些病例报告表明,长期使用h2受体拮抗剂,主要是西咪替丁和雷尼替丁,可能会增加胃癌的风险。在早期病例报告之后,至少发表了6项分析性流行病学研究(2项队列研究和4项病例对照研究),包括总计约1000例胃癌。在开始使用h2受体拮抗剂后的第一年,相对风险(RR)系统地和实质性地升高,并在随后的几年中趋于平稳。在药物使用的前5年仍然存在一些明显的额外风险,可能是由于对先前存在的肿瘤性胃病变的错误诊断和治疗,但在两项研究中,包括长期使用信息在内的开始药物治疗后>或= 10年的估计RR均未超过1。因此,分析性流行病学研究的结果与h2受体拮抗剂的使用与胃癌风险之间缺乏因果关系是一致的。食管癌和结直肠癌的数据不支持使用西咪替丁与这些肿瘤风险之间的相关关系。在丹麦的一项队列研究中,关于总癌症死亡率,男性第一年的RR为1.9,前5年的RR为1.4;女性的对应值分别为1.7和1.5。在英国的一项队列研究中,第一年的RR为3.4,2-10年的RR为1.3。第一年的额外风险主要是由于胃癌。奥美拉唑和其他质子泵抑制剂的上市后监测数据比h2受体拮抗剂少得多,特别是长期使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The PROPHET project paves the way for personalized prevention in the future healthcare. Prostate cancer burden in major BRICS countries, 1990-2019: findings from the 2019 global burden of disease study. Cancer mortality predictions for 2024 in selected Asian countries and Australia with focus on stomach cancer. Non-contrast MRI and post-mastectomy silicone breast implant rupture: preventing false positive diagnoses. Comment to: Inequalities in adherence to cervical cancer screening in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1