Efficacy and Tolerance of Interferon β Plus Ribavirin Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients with Depression or ThrombocytopeniaComparison with Pegylated Interferon α Plus Ribavirin Treatment

H. Ikezaki, N. Furusyo, E. Ogawa, Motohiro Shimizu, Satoshi Hiramine, K. Ura, F. Mitsumoto, Kouji Takayama, K. Toyoda, M. Murata, J. Hayashi
{"title":"Efficacy and Tolerance of Interferon β Plus Ribavirin Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients with Depression or ThrombocytopeniaComparison with Pegylated Interferon α Plus Ribavirin Treatment","authors":"H. Ikezaki, N. Furusyo, E. Ogawa, Motohiro Shimizu, Satoshi Hiramine, K. Ura, F. Mitsumoto, Kouji Takayama, K. Toyoda, M. Murata, J. Hayashi","doi":"10.4172/2167-0889.1000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Limited data has been reported comparing natural human interferon β (nIFNβ) and pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFNα) when Ribavirin (RBV) is combined. This case-control study was done to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of a combination treatment of nIFNβ or PEG-IFNα plus RBV for chronic hepatitis C patients. \nMethods: Sixty patients with chronic hepatitis C, 42 infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 18 infected with genotype 2, were treated with nIFNβ plus RBV. Of them, 23 (38.3%) suffered pre-treatment severe depression. Their data was compared with 60 undepressed patients treated with a combination of PEG-IFNα plus RBV. nIFNβ was given intravenously and PEG-IFNα was injected subcutaneously. \n Results: Sustained virological response (undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment) did not significantly differ between the nIFNβ and PEG-IFNα treated patients (genotype 1, 21.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.328; genotype 2, 72.2% vs. 88.9%, respectively, P=0.402). None of the nIFNβ treated patients showed exacerbation of depression, while 7 (11.7%) of 60 PEG-IFNα treated patients developed severe depression or malaise. The platelet count of nIFNβ treated patients increased to higher than baseline after week 8, but the platelet count of PEG-IFNα treated patients decreased throughout the treatment. There were significant differences of the changes of platelet counts between the both groups throughout the treatment (all P<0.001). \nConclusion: nIFNβ plus RBV treatment was well tolerated by chronic hepatitis C patients with depression or thrombpcytopenia.","PeriodicalId":16145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0889.1000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Limited data has been reported comparing natural human interferon β (nIFNβ) and pegylated IFN-α (PEG-IFNα) when Ribavirin (RBV) is combined. This case-control study was done to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of a combination treatment of nIFNβ or PEG-IFNα plus RBV for chronic hepatitis C patients. Methods: Sixty patients with chronic hepatitis C, 42 infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 18 infected with genotype 2, were treated with nIFNβ plus RBV. Of them, 23 (38.3%) suffered pre-treatment severe depression. Their data was compared with 60 undepressed patients treated with a combination of PEG-IFNα plus RBV. nIFNβ was given intravenously and PEG-IFNα was injected subcutaneously. Results: Sustained virological response (undetectable HCV RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment) did not significantly differ between the nIFNβ and PEG-IFNα treated patients (genotype 1, 21.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.328; genotype 2, 72.2% vs. 88.9%, respectively, P=0.402). None of the nIFNβ treated patients showed exacerbation of depression, while 7 (11.7%) of 60 PEG-IFNα treated patients developed severe depression or malaise. The platelet count of nIFNβ treated patients increased to higher than baseline after week 8, but the platelet count of PEG-IFNα treated patients decreased throughout the treatment. There were significant differences of the changes of platelet counts between the both groups throughout the treatment (all P<0.001). Conclusion: nIFNβ plus RBV treatment was well tolerated by chronic hepatitis C patients with depression or thrombpcytopenia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干扰素β+利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎伴抑郁或血小板减少患者的疗效和耐受性与聚乙二醇化干扰素α+利巴韦林治疗的比较
目的:比较利巴韦林(RBV)联合使用天然人干扰素β (nIFNβ)和聚乙二醇化干扰素α (PEG-IFNα)的数据报道有限。这项病例对照研究是为了比较nIFNβ或PEG-IFNα加RBV联合治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的疗效和不良反应。方法:对60例慢性丙型肝炎患者进行nIFNβ + RBV治疗,其中基因1型感染42例,基因2型感染18例。其中23例(38.3%)在治疗前患有重度抑郁症。他们的数据与60名接受PEG-IFNα + RBV联合治疗的非抑郁症患者进行了比较。nIFNβ静脉注射,PEG-IFNα皮下注射。结果:nIFNβ和PEG-IFNα治疗患者的持续病毒学应答(治疗结束后24周未检测到HCV RNA)无显著差异(基因型1,21.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.328;基因型2分别为72.2%对88.9%,P=0.402)。nIFNβ治疗的患者没有出现抑郁加重,而60例PEG-IFNα治疗的患者中有7例(11.7%)出现严重抑郁或不适。第8周后,nIFNβ治疗组的血小板计数高于基线,而PEG-IFNα治疗组的血小板计数在整个治疗过程中下降。两组患者治疗过程中血小板计数变化差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论:nIFNβ联合RBV治疗合并抑郁或血小板减少的慢性丙型肝炎患者耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review on Frailty in Patient with Liver Cirrhosis and Its Management Recent and Novel Observations Pertaining to Non-Infectious Liver Disorders Editor's Note on Liver Journal Liver Fibrosis Conventional and Molecular Imaging Diagnosis Update Spontaneous Fungal Peritonitis in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1