Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice?

Ankita Batla, J. Soon, R. Morton
{"title":"Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice?","authors":"Ankita Batla, J. Soon, R. Morton","doi":"10.5750/ejpch.v8i3.1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sixth Annual Conference and Awards Ceremony of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare (ESPCH6), dynamically co-created by the ESPCH and WPP Health Practice, was delivered earlier this year at the University of West London on 27 & 28 February 2020 [1]. The purpose of ESPCH6 was to debate how the reintroduction of the historic tenets of humanistic medicine/healthcare could take place within a data-driven modern context, with a laser-sharp focus on the pragmatic imperative of higher quality care at sustainable or lowered cost. The conference brought together a wide range of distinguished clinical and academic speakers, chairpersons, and key opinion leaders from across the globe, including the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, and, in the UK, colleagues from the University of Oxford, University of West London, Manchester Metropolitan University, Kingston University, St. George’s University of London, the University of Hull, and the University of Gloucester UK. Over ESPCH6’s two intensive days, 33 detailed presentations were delivered across 11 academic sessions, spanning a wide range of study areas of immediate relevance to the development and implementation of person-centred approaches within health and social care systems [1]. Notably, and as a direct function of ESPCH’s partnership with WPP Health Practice, a key characteristic of ESPCH6 was the inclusion, as speakers, of a wide range of expert patients and patient advocacy organisations, alongside a range of senior colleagues as speakers from the pharmaceutical and healthcare technology industries. In this Guest Editorial, we report and discuss the results of our recent interviews with senior members of the pharmaceutical industry, principally those who presented at ESPCH6, but also others. We demonstrate how pharmaceutical companies are stepping up to the personcentered care (PCC) agenda, and how their individual and collective approaches are adding value and momentum to the global PCC movement.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"47 1","pages":"277-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ejpch.v8i3.1897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sixth Annual Conference and Awards Ceremony of the European Society for Person Centered Healthcare (ESPCH6), dynamically co-created by the ESPCH and WPP Health Practice, was delivered earlier this year at the University of West London on 27 & 28 February 2020 [1]. The purpose of ESPCH6 was to debate how the reintroduction of the historic tenets of humanistic medicine/healthcare could take place within a data-driven modern context, with a laser-sharp focus on the pragmatic imperative of higher quality care at sustainable or lowered cost. The conference brought together a wide range of distinguished clinical and academic speakers, chairpersons, and key opinion leaders from across the globe, including the USA, Canada, Australia, Germany, Switzerland, Denmark, and, in the UK, colleagues from the University of Oxford, University of West London, Manchester Metropolitan University, Kingston University, St. George’s University of London, the University of Hull, and the University of Gloucester UK. Over ESPCH6’s two intensive days, 33 detailed presentations were delivered across 11 academic sessions, spanning a wide range of study areas of immediate relevance to the development and implementation of person-centred approaches within health and social care systems [1]. Notably, and as a direct function of ESPCH’s partnership with WPP Health Practice, a key characteristic of ESPCH6 was the inclusion, as speakers, of a wide range of expert patients and patient advocacy organisations, alongside a range of senior colleagues as speakers from the pharmaceutical and healthcare technology industries. In this Guest Editorial, we report and discuss the results of our recent interviews with senior members of the pharmaceutical industry, principally those who presented at ESPCH6, but also others. We demonstrate how pharmaceutical companies are stepping up to the personcentered care (PCC) agenda, and how their individual and collective approaches are adding value and momentum to the global PCC movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为中心的医疗保健与以患者为中心的医疗保健——有什么区别?制药公司如何确保患者声音的内部代表?
由ESPCH和WPP健康实践动态共同创建的欧洲以人为中心的医疗保健协会(ESPCH6)第六届年会和颁奖典礼于今年早些时候于2020年2月27日和28日在西伦敦大学举行。ESPCH6的目的是讨论如何在数据驱动的现代背景下重新引入人文医学/保健的历史原则,重点关注以可持续或低成本提供更高质量护理的务实必要性。会议汇集了来自世界各地的众多杰出临床和学术演讲者、主席和主要意见领袖,包括美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、德国、瑞士、丹麦,以及来自英国牛津大学、西伦敦大学、曼彻斯特城市大学、金斯顿大学、伦敦圣乔治大学、赫尔大学和英国格洛斯特大学的同事。在ESPCH6密集的两天里,11个学术会议上发表了33份详细的报告,涵盖了与卫生和社会保健系统中以人为本的方法的发展和实施直接相关的广泛研究领域。值得注意的是,作为ESPCH与WPP健康实践合作伙伴关系的直接职能,ESPCH6的一个关键特征是邀请了广泛的专家患者和患者倡导组织作为演讲者,以及来自制药和医疗保健技术行业的一系列资深同事作为演讲者。在这篇客座社论中,我们报告并讨论了我们最近对制药行业高级成员的采访结果,主要是那些在ESPCH6上发言的人,但也有其他人。我们展示了制药公司如何加快以人为本的护理(PCC)议程,以及他们的个人和集体方法如何为全球PCC运动增加价值和动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1