Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1553/MOEGG162S123
Alexandru Brad
{"title":"Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania","authors":"Alexandru Brad","doi":"10.1553/MOEGG162S123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article I explore the transfer of the territorial cohesion ideal of integrated polycentric development from the European Union’s (EU) institutional core towards the peripheral places of a Romanian region. The literature review explores the emergence of polycentric development as an attempt of reconciling divergent EU-wide spatial visions of growth and cohesion. I also explore the institutional particularities that shape the transfer of territorial cohesion in South-Eastern EU Member States. Drawing on Mark Bevir’s and Rod Rhodes’ “Decentered Governance Approach”, I design a conceptual framework to analyse this transfer through an actor-centered bottom-up perspective. My empirical material draws on qualitative research (policy document analysis and semi-structured expert interviews) conducted at the local, regional, and national levels. My analysis highlights the decision-making practices that underpin the making and implementing of urban and regional development policies. It examines the key substantive and governance narratives that underlie integrated polycentric development. I conclude the paper by highlighting the dominance of the concentrated growth development paradigm and make the case for territorial development concepts that are more sensitive to issues of peripheralisation.","PeriodicalId":44373,"journal":{"name":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","volume":"128 1","pages":"123-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitteilungen Der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/MOEGG162S123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this article I explore the transfer of the territorial cohesion ideal of integrated polycentric development from the European Union’s (EU) institutional core towards the peripheral places of a Romanian region. The literature review explores the emergence of polycentric development as an attempt of reconciling divergent EU-wide spatial visions of growth and cohesion. I also explore the institutional particularities that shape the transfer of territorial cohesion in South-Eastern EU Member States. Drawing on Mark Bevir’s and Rod Rhodes’ “Decentered Governance Approach”, I design a conceptual framework to analyse this transfer through an actor-centered bottom-up perspective. My empirical material draws on qualitative research (policy document analysis and semi-structured expert interviews) conducted at the local, regional, and national levels. My analysis highlights the decision-making practices that underpin the making and implementing of urban and regional development policies. It examines the key substantive and governance narratives that underlie integrated polycentric development. I conclude the paper by highlighting the dominance of the concentrated growth development paradigm and make the case for territorial development concepts that are more sensitive to issues of peripheralisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在周边化的背景下转移多中心综合发展的地域凝聚力理想——来自罗马尼亚的见解
在本文中,我探讨了一体化多中心发展的领土凝聚力理想从欧盟(EU)制度核心向罗马尼亚地区外围地区的转移。文献综述探讨了多中心发展的出现,作为调和不同的欧盟范围内的增长和凝聚力的空间愿景的尝试。我还探讨了塑造东南欧盟成员国领土凝聚力转移的制度特殊性。借鉴Mark Bevir和Rod Rhodes的“去中心化治理方法”,我设计了一个概念性框架,通过以行动者为中心的自下而上的视角来分析这种转移。我的实证材料借鉴了在地方、区域和国家层面进行的定性研究(政策文件分析和半结构化专家访谈)。我的分析强调了支撑城市和区域发展政策制定和实施的决策实践。它考察了构成综合多中心发展基础的关键实质性和治理叙事。最后,我强调了集中式增长发展模式的主导地位,并提出了对外围化问题更为敏感的领土发展概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
From Exception to Norm? Analysing Gated Housing in Sofia and Kiev since 1989 The Urban Transformations of Post-Yugoslavia: Negotiating the Contemporary City in Sarajevo, Belgrade, and Zagreb Transferring the Territorial Cohesion Ideal of Integrated Polycentric Development in the Light of Peripheralisation – Insights from Romania Wanderungsmotive ausgewählter Bevölkerungsgruppen in Kärnten Multiple Dimensions of Mediatised Translocal Social Practices. A Case Study of Domestic Migrants in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1