Migrations and new expulsions: accumulation by dispossession or crisis of capitalist societal reproduction?

IF 6.3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Progress in Human Geography Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1177/19427786231176789
Daniel Manzione Giavarotti, Ana Carolina Gonçalves Leite, Clara Lemme Ribeiro
{"title":"Migrations and new expulsions: accumulation by dispossession or crisis of capitalist societal reproduction?","authors":"Daniel Manzione Giavarotti, Ana Carolina Gonçalves Leite, Clara Lemme Ribeiro","doi":"10.1177/19427786231176789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper discusses the relation between population dynamics and accumulation of capital, with special emphasis on a critical dialogue with the theory of accumulation by dispossession as presented by Marxist geographer David Harvey. We depart from a discussion on the so-called primitive accumulation as conceptualized by Karl Marx, in order to identify the fundamental meaning of the said historical process: the formation of capitalism, rooted in the separation between owners of means of production, on the one hand, and owners of the workforce commodity, on the other. From there on, we present a critical appraisal of the land grabbing scholarship, in which we spotlight similarities between land grabbing's expulsive and expropriating effects and the so-called accumulation by dispossession and its supposed capacity to resolve capital's crises. However, we problematize such an interpretation in light of the fundamental crisis of capital, that is, capital's tendency to absorb less and less workers into productive processes, due to capitalist competition and technological development, that in turn undermines capital accumulation itself. Lastly, we explore how contemporary expulsion processes, in a multiscalar register, go hand in hand with distinct confinement strategies as forms of surplus population management, typical of the barbarism provoked by the collapse of capitalism.","PeriodicalId":48403,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Human Geography","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Human Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427786231176789","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper discusses the relation between population dynamics and accumulation of capital, with special emphasis on a critical dialogue with the theory of accumulation by dispossession as presented by Marxist geographer David Harvey. We depart from a discussion on the so-called primitive accumulation as conceptualized by Karl Marx, in order to identify the fundamental meaning of the said historical process: the formation of capitalism, rooted in the separation between owners of means of production, on the one hand, and owners of the workforce commodity, on the other. From there on, we present a critical appraisal of the land grabbing scholarship, in which we spotlight similarities between land grabbing's expulsive and expropriating effects and the so-called accumulation by dispossession and its supposed capacity to resolve capital's crises. However, we problematize such an interpretation in light of the fundamental crisis of capital, that is, capital's tendency to absorb less and less workers into productive processes, due to capitalist competition and technological development, that in turn undermines capital accumulation itself. Lastly, we explore how contemporary expulsion processes, in a multiscalar register, go hand in hand with distinct confinement strategies as forms of surplus population management, typical of the barbarism provoked by the collapse of capitalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民和新的驱逐:剥夺的积累还是资本主义社会再生产的危机?
本文讨论了人口动态和资本积累之间的关系,特别强调了与马克思主义地理学家大卫·哈维提出的剥夺积累理论的批判性对话。我们从卡尔·马克思所提出的所谓原始积累的概念出发,以确定上述历史过程的基本含义:资本主义的形成,植根于生产资料所有者和劳动力商品所有者之间的分离。从这里开始,我们对土地掠夺学术进行了批判性的评估,其中我们强调了土地掠夺的驱逐和征用效果与所谓的剥夺积累及其解决资本危机的能力之间的相似性。然而,鉴于资本的根本危机,即由于资本主义竞争和技术发展,资本倾向于吸收越来越少的工人进入生产过程,这反过来又破坏了资本积累本身,我们对这种解释提出了问题。最后,我们探讨了当代驱逐过程如何在多标量寄存器中与作为过剩人口管理形式的独特限制策略齐头并进,这是资本主义崩溃引发的典型野蛮行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
7.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Progress in Human Geography is the peer-review journal of choice for those wanting to know about the state of the art in all areas of research in the field of human geography - philosophical, theoretical, thematic, methodological or empirical. Concerned primarily with critical reviews of current research, PiHG enables a space for debate about questions, concepts and findings of formative influence in human geography.
期刊最新文献
Statecraft at the frontier of capitalism: A grounded view from China. Temporal logics in geographical research on migration and refugees The work of fluid metaphors in migration research: Geographical imaginations and the politics of writing Empire, redux: Towards a new political geography of race war The agrarian question of climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1