Podcasting and constructive journalism in health stories about antimicrobial resistance (AMR)

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Media International Australia Pub Date : 2023-01-31 DOI:10.1177/1329878X221148499
M. Lindgren, Britt Jorgensen
{"title":"Podcasting and constructive journalism in health stories about antimicrobial resistance (AMR)","authors":"M. Lindgren, Britt Jorgensen","doi":"10.1177/1329878X221148499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 showed the importance of trustworthy and accessible health information. News organisations increasingly introduced podcasting to keep their audiences informed. Podcasting's documented capacity for listener engagement makes it a pertinent medium to study another global public health threat – superbugs – through the lens of constructive journalism. Both constructive journalism and podcasting feature lived experiences of sources, in constructive journalism focused on empowering audiences to act. This practice-led research study is the first to explore how solutions-oriented journalism intersects with narrative podcasts. It demonstrates through the production of a podcast series about antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an affordance to tell complex and often scary health stories. It finds that podcasting can position individuals affected by AMR as sources of empowering information, rather than as victims. The study contributes new knowledge to constructive podcast journalism as an impactful approach in public health journalism, leveraging its potential to provide solutions to listeners and promote change.","PeriodicalId":46880,"journal":{"name":"Media International Australia","volume":"85 1","pages":"73 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media International Australia","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221148499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

COVID-19 showed the importance of trustworthy and accessible health information. News organisations increasingly introduced podcasting to keep their audiences informed. Podcasting's documented capacity for listener engagement makes it a pertinent medium to study another global public health threat – superbugs – through the lens of constructive journalism. Both constructive journalism and podcasting feature lived experiences of sources, in constructive journalism focused on empowering audiences to act. This practice-led research study is the first to explore how solutions-oriented journalism intersects with narrative podcasts. It demonstrates through the production of a podcast series about antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an affordance to tell complex and often scary health stories. It finds that podcasting can position individuals affected by AMR as sources of empowering information, rather than as victims. The study contributes new knowledge to constructive podcast journalism as an impactful approach in public health journalism, leveraging its potential to provide solutions to listeners and promote change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
播客和关于抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的健康新闻的建设性新闻报道
COVID-19显示了可信和可获取的卫生信息的重要性。新闻机构越来越多地引入播客来让他们的受众了解最新情况。播客记录了听众参与的能力,这使它成为通过建设性新闻的视角研究另一个全球公共卫生威胁——超级细菌的相关媒介。建设性新闻和播客都以消息来源的生活经历为特色,建设性新闻的重点是赋予受众行动的权力。这项以实践为主导的研究是第一个探索以解决方案为导向的新闻如何与叙事播客交叉的研究。它通过制作一个关于抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的播客系列,展示了讲述复杂且往往可怕的健康故事的能力。研究发现,播客可以将受抗菌素耐药性影响的个人定位为赋权信息的来源,而不是受害者。该研究为建设性播客新闻作为公共卫生新闻的一种有影响力的方法提供了新的知识,利用其为听众提供解决方案和促进变革的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
AANZCA2023 Conference Special Issue: Introduction Digital Racism and Antiracism Toward Asian and Muslim Communities During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Australian Experience Wellness communities and vaccine hesitancy Making public or quiet listening? Media logics and public inquiries into the abuse of children Exploring a post-truth referendum: Australia's Voice to Parliament and the management of attention on social media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1