Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation

D. Stolle, M. Hooghe, Michele Micheletti
{"title":"Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation","authors":"D. Stolle, M. Hooghe, Michele Micheletti","doi":"10.1177/0192512105053784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both anecdotal and case-study evidence have long suggested that consumer behavior such as the buying or boycotting of products and services for political and ethical reasons can take on political significance. Despite recent claims that such behavior has become more widespread in recent years, political consumerism has not been studied systematically in survey research on political participation. Through the use of a pilot survey conducted among 1015 Canadian, Belgian, and Swedish students, we ascertain whether political consumerism is a sufficiently consistent behavioral pattern to be measured and studied meaningfully. The data from this pilot survey allow us to build a “political consumerism index” incorporating attitudinal, behavioral, and frequency measurements. Our analysis of this cross-national student sample suggests that political consumerism is primarily a tool of those who are distrustful of political institutions. However, political consumers have more trust in other citizens, and they are disproportionately involved in checkbook organizations. They also tend to score highly on measures of political efficacy and post-materialism. We strongly suggest including measurements of political consumerism together with other emerging forms of activism in future population surveys on political participation.","PeriodicalId":93769,"journal":{"name":"International political science review : IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique = RISP","volume":"26 8 1","pages":"245 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"827","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International political science review : IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique = RISP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 827

Abstract

Both anecdotal and case-study evidence have long suggested that consumer behavior such as the buying or boycotting of products and services for political and ethical reasons can take on political significance. Despite recent claims that such behavior has become more widespread in recent years, political consumerism has not been studied systematically in survey research on political participation. Through the use of a pilot survey conducted among 1015 Canadian, Belgian, and Swedish students, we ascertain whether political consumerism is a sufficiently consistent behavioral pattern to be measured and studied meaningfully. The data from this pilot survey allow us to build a “political consumerism index” incorporating attitudinal, behavioral, and frequency measurements. Our analysis of this cross-national student sample suggests that political consumerism is primarily a tool of those who are distrustful of political institutions. However, political consumers have more trust in other citizens, and they are disproportionately involved in checkbook organizations. They also tend to score highly on measures of political efficacy and post-materialism. We strongly suggest including measurements of political consumerism together with other emerging forms of activism in future population surveys on political participation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超市中的政治:作为政治参与形式的政治消费主义
长期以来,轶事和案例研究证据都表明,出于政治和道德原因购买或抵制产品和服务等消费者行为可能具有政治意义。尽管最近声称这种行为近年来变得越来越普遍,但政治消费主义并没有在政治参与的调查研究中得到系统的研究。通过对1015名加拿大、比利时和瑞典学生进行的试点调查,我们确定政治消费主义是否是一种足够一致的行为模式,值得进行有意义的测量和研究。这个试点调查的数据使我们能够建立一个包含态度、行为和频率测量的“政治消费主义指数”。我们对这个跨国学生样本的分析表明,政治消费主义主要是那些不信任政治制度的人的工具。然而,政治消费者更信任其他公民,他们不成比例地参与了支票簿组织。他们在政治效能和后物质主义方面也往往得分很高。我们强烈建议在未来的政治参与人口调查中包括政治消费主义和其他新兴形式的行动主义的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marginalized, but not demobilized: Ethnic minority protest activity when facing discrimination. Attack politics from Albania to Zimbabwe: A large-scale comparative study on the drivers of negative campaigning. Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation Abstracts/Résumés Contentious Collective Action and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1