Teachers’ private theories and their adoption of affordances of mobile social media: a qualitative multi-case study of teachers’ integration of WeChat in higher education in China

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/09523987.2020.1824421
Sijia Xue, D. Churchill
{"title":"Teachers’ private theories and their adoption of affordances of mobile social media: a qualitative multi-case study of teachers’ integration of WeChat in higher education in China","authors":"Sijia Xue, D. Churchill","doi":"10.1080/09523987.2020.1824421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports on a study designed to explore the educational affordances of mobile social media and how teachers’ private theories mediate integration of the affordances in teaching practice in higher education in China. Four university teachers were included as cases for an in-depth inquiry in this study. Qualitative data were collected through multiple methods, including observations, interviews and documents such as written reflections provided by the participants. Thematic content analysis was performed to explicate categories of affordances and private theories. Nine categories of affordances of mobile social media emerged from the results. Analysis of data also exposed a number of areas of private theories that influenced the decisions for technology integration of different teachers. Theories about Learning most productively mediated instructional decisions leading to student-centered practices while other theories were leading to more traditional practices. Private theories of the participants transformed with their adoption of affordances of mobile social media, and thus reflection emerged as a critical strategy for productively transforming teachers’ private theories. Moreover, recommendations for practitioners are delivered and suggestions for future research are provided.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1824421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports on a study designed to explore the educational affordances of mobile social media and how teachers’ private theories mediate integration of the affordances in teaching practice in higher education in China. Four university teachers were included as cases for an in-depth inquiry in this study. Qualitative data were collected through multiple methods, including observations, interviews and documents such as written reflections provided by the participants. Thematic content analysis was performed to explicate categories of affordances and private theories. Nine categories of affordances of mobile social media emerged from the results. Analysis of data also exposed a number of areas of private theories that influenced the decisions for technology integration of different teachers. Theories about Learning most productively mediated instructional decisions leading to student-centered practices while other theories were leading to more traditional practices. Private theories of the participants transformed with their adoption of affordances of mobile social media, and thus reflection emerged as a critical strategy for productively transforming teachers’ private theories. Moreover, recommendations for practitioners are delivered and suggestions for future research are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师私人理论及其对移动社交媒体启示的采用:中国高等教育教师微信整合的定性多案例研究
摘要本研究旨在探讨移动社交媒体的教育启示,以及教师的私人理论如何在中国高等教育教学实践中调解启示的整合。本研究选取四名大学教师作为个案进行深入探究。定性数据是通过多种方法收集的,包括观察、访谈和参与者提供的书面反思等文件。通过主题内容分析,阐明了启示和私人理论的范畴。从调查结果中可以得出移动社交媒体的九种表现形式。数据分析还揭示了一些影响不同教师技术整合决策的私人理论领域。学习理论最有效地介导了教学决策,导致以学生为中心的实践,而其他理论导致更传统的实践。参与者的私人理论随着他们采用移动社交媒体的支持而转变,因此反思成为有效转变教师私人理论的关键策略。此外,本文也对实务人员提出建议,并对未来的研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1