Li Yongqiang, Chen Jingmin, Xiong Zhengye, W. Wenhua, T. Zhao, Shi Wenqing, Li Shiping
{"title":"Investigation on Thermoluminescence of Al2O3:C and LiF:Mg,Cu,P to Natural Background Radiation","authors":"Li Yongqiang, Chen Jingmin, Xiong Zhengye, W. Wenhua, T. Zhao, Shi Wenqing, Li Shiping","doi":"10.1109/ICBEB.2012.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To choose the best thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for low radiation dose detector, thermo luminescence responses of three kinds of TLDs, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>: C and LiF: Mg, Cu, P, were measured, and the natural background radiation in Zhanjiang is used as a low radiation field. The TLDs' sensitivities were compared, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:C (the threshold dose of is about 1-2μGy) is in some sort more sensitive than LiF:Mg, Cu, P (the threshold dose of is about 2μGy). Temperature of glow peak of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:C is not so high, and the TL would decay after a relatively long period, so the TL dose response curve of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:C is deviation from linearity. Temperatures of glow peaks of LiF:Mg, Cu, P are relatively high, and the TL would hardly decay after a relatively long period, so the TL dose response curves are nearly linearity. In a word, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>:C is not the best TLD in low radiation cumulative dose detection, although it is the best optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD).","PeriodicalId":6374,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology","volume":"17 1","pages":"1042-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBEB.2012.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
To choose the best thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for low radiation dose detector, thermo luminescence responses of three kinds of TLDs, Al2O3: C and LiF: Mg, Cu, P, were measured, and the natural background radiation in Zhanjiang is used as a low radiation field. The TLDs' sensitivities were compared, Al2O3:C (the threshold dose of is about 1-2μGy) is in some sort more sensitive than LiF:Mg, Cu, P (the threshold dose of is about 2μGy). Temperature of glow peak of Al2O3:C is not so high, and the TL would decay after a relatively long period, so the TL dose response curve of Al2O3:C is deviation from linearity. Temperatures of glow peaks of LiF:Mg, Cu, P are relatively high, and the TL would hardly decay after a relatively long period, so the TL dose response curves are nearly linearity. In a word, Al2O3:C is not the best TLD in low radiation cumulative dose detection, although it is the best optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD).