Prediction method for shear stability of composite hat-stringer stiffened panel

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Aerospace Systems Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1007/s42401-023-00220-x
Shui Han, Yu Yin, Hu YiLe, Xiao Hao, Xu YunYao
{"title":"Prediction method for shear stability of composite hat-stringer stiffened panel","authors":"Shui Han,&nbsp;Yu Yin,&nbsp;Hu YiLe,&nbsp;Xiao Hao,&nbsp;Xu YunYao","doi":"10.1007/s42401-023-00220-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, the shear stability of a composite hat-stringer stiffened panel was studied by the means of both shear frame test and theoretical analysis. The test specimen is a typical flat composite stiffened panel composed of skin, five hat-shaped stringers, two Z-shaped transverse frames and reinforcement layers. Firstly, a method that can quantitatively capture the buckling load and buckling morphology was proposed. Then, considering the shear-loading fixture as an elastic system with hinged and bolted connections, a finite element model including both shear-loading fixture and specimen was established. The linear buckling analysis was carried out using the subspace method. The first-order buckling mode was in good agreement with the buckling morphology obtained from the test. Furthermore, the deformed configuration of the first buckling mode was multiplied by the mode scale factor, and then introduced into the model as the initial defect. Based on this model, the nonlinear buckling analysis was performed via arc length method. The analysis results were in good agreement with the test. The relative errors between the predicted buckling loads and the test results were 7.0<span>\\(\\%\\)</span> and <span>\\(-\\)</span>3.8<span>\\(\\%\\)</span> from linear and nonlinear buckling analyses, respectively. Nonlinear buckling analysis has higher accuracy and tends to be conservative than linear buckling analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36309,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42401-023-00220-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the shear stability of a composite hat-stringer stiffened panel was studied by the means of both shear frame test and theoretical analysis. The test specimen is a typical flat composite stiffened panel composed of skin, five hat-shaped stringers, two Z-shaped transverse frames and reinforcement layers. Firstly, a method that can quantitatively capture the buckling load and buckling morphology was proposed. Then, considering the shear-loading fixture as an elastic system with hinged and bolted connections, a finite element model including both shear-loading fixture and specimen was established. The linear buckling analysis was carried out using the subspace method. The first-order buckling mode was in good agreement with the buckling morphology obtained from the test. Furthermore, the deformed configuration of the first buckling mode was multiplied by the mode scale factor, and then introduced into the model as the initial defect. Based on this model, the nonlinear buckling analysis was performed via arc length method. The analysis results were in good agreement with the test. The relative errors between the predicted buckling loads and the test results were 7.0\(\%\) and \(-\)3.8\(\%\) from linear and nonlinear buckling analyses, respectively. Nonlinear buckling analysis has higher accuracy and tends to be conservative than linear buckling analysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复合材料帽筋加筋板抗剪稳定性预测方法
本文采用剪力框架试验和理论分析相结合的方法,对复合材料帽筋加筋板的抗剪稳定性进行了研究。试件为典型的平面复合加筋板,由表皮、5根帽形筋、2根z形横框和配筋层组成。首先,提出了一种能够定量捕捉屈曲载荷和屈曲形态的方法。然后,将剪切加载夹具视为一个铰接和螺栓连接的弹性系统,建立了包含剪切加载夹具和试件的有限元模型。采用子空间法对结构进行了线性屈曲分析。一阶屈曲模态与试验得到的屈曲形态吻合较好。将第一阶屈曲模态的变形构型与模态比例因子相乘,作为初始缺陷引入模型。基于该模型,采用弧长法进行了非线性屈曲分析。分析结果与试验结果吻合较好。线性屈曲和非线性屈曲的预测屈曲载荷与试验结果的相对误差分别为7.0 \(\%\)和\(-\) 3.8 \(\%\)。与线性屈曲分析相比,非线性屈曲分析具有较高的精度和保守性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace Systems
Aerospace Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Aerospace Systems provides an international, peer-reviewed forum which focuses on system-level research and development regarding aeronautics and astronautics. The journal emphasizes the unique role and increasing importance of informatics on aerospace. It fills a gap in current publishing coverage from outer space vehicles to atmospheric vehicles by highlighting interdisciplinary science, technology and engineering. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: Trans-space vehicle systems design and integration Air vehicle systems Space vehicle systems Near-space vehicle systems Aerospace robotics and unmanned system Communication, navigation and surveillance Aerodynamics and aircraft design Dynamics and control Aerospace propulsion Avionics system Opto-electronic system Air traffic management Earth observation Deep space exploration Bionic micro-aircraft/spacecraft Intelligent sensing and Information fusion
期刊最新文献
Trajectory prediction for fighter aircraft ground collision avoidance based on the model predictive control technique Initial gap modeling for wing assembly analysis A survey on synthetic jets as active flow control Deconvolution of mode composition beamforming for rotating source localization Computational study on effect of free-stream turbulence on bio-inspired corrugated airfoil at different sections at low Reynolds number
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1