Working with multiple representations: preservice teachers’ decision-making to produce a digital explanation

Q2 Social Sciences Learning: Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23735082.2020.1750673
Wendy Nielsen, Annette Turney, H. Georgiou, Pauline Jones
{"title":"Working with multiple representations: preservice teachers’ decision-making to produce a digital explanation","authors":"Wendy Nielsen, Annette Turney, H. Georgiou, Pauline Jones","doi":"10.1080/23735082.2020.1750673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A “digital explanation” is a science learning task where learners explain science content to non-expert others, in this case, the learners are primary preservice teachers [PST] in a science methods class. In the task, PST are assigned a prompt based on science content from the New South Wales K-6 syllabus and generate or source multiple representations to design and produce this stand-alone digital artefact. In this study, PST were interviewed about their decision making in producing the digital explanation, which offers insight into the design process and what makes for a successful product. Data include the digital explanations, interviews with nine PST, marking rubrics and rationale statements generated as part of the task. Thematic coding shows PST make design decisions for four principal reasons: content, engagement, clarity and unconscious selection. Decisions around content and engagement prevail and their decisions reveal keys to success in creating a digital explanation. We also note a tension between emphasis on engagement over content, which may reflect that the intended audience is young children and PST have a strong desire to gain and keep children’s interest.","PeriodicalId":52244,"journal":{"name":"Learning: Research and Practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"51 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT A “digital explanation” is a science learning task where learners explain science content to non-expert others, in this case, the learners are primary preservice teachers [PST] in a science methods class. In the task, PST are assigned a prompt based on science content from the New South Wales K-6 syllabus and generate or source multiple representations to design and produce this stand-alone digital artefact. In this study, PST were interviewed about their decision making in producing the digital explanation, which offers insight into the design process and what makes for a successful product. Data include the digital explanations, interviews with nine PST, marking rubrics and rationale statements generated as part of the task. Thematic coding shows PST make design decisions for four principal reasons: content, engagement, clarity and unconscious selection. Decisions around content and engagement prevail and their decisions reveal keys to success in creating a digital explanation. We also note a tension between emphasis on engagement over content, which may reflect that the intended audience is young children and PST have a strong desire to gain and keep children’s interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理多重表征:职前教师的决策生成数字解释
“数字解释”是一项科学学习任务,学习者向非专家解释科学内容,在这种情况下,学习者是科学方法课堂上的初级职前教师。在任务中,PST被分配了一个基于新南威尔士州K-6教学大纲中的科学内容的提示,并生成或来源多个表示来设计和制作这个独立的数字人工产品。在这项研究中,PST接受了关于他们在制作数字解释时的决策的采访,这为设计过程和成功产品的要素提供了见解。数据包括数字解释,与九个PST的访谈,标记规则和作为任务一部分生成的基本原理陈述。主题编码显示PST基于四个主要原因做出设计决策:内容、用户粘性、清晰度和无意识选择。围绕内容和参与度的决策占主导地位,他们的决策揭示了成功创建数字解释的关键。我们还注意到强调参与与内容之间的紧张关系,这可能反映了目标受众是幼儿,而PST强烈希望获得并保持儿童的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning: Research and Practice
Learning: Research and Practice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Speak like a pro: boosting language proficiency, engagement, and reducing anxiety, in virtual reality through innovative media transition with MondlyVR and VirtualSpeech Promoting pre-service teacher development through intervention-based action research Better learning and practice with teacher corrective feedback in higher education: a lesson from Thailand Factors influencing undergraduate students’ engagement in online learning: a PLS-SEM approach Learning journal 2.0: refinements for greater heights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1