E-Discovery in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Practice, Procedures, Challenges and Opportunities

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Journal of International Dispute Settlement Pub Date : 2021-02-05 DOI:10.1093/JNLIDS/IDAA019
Esmé Shirlow
{"title":"E-Discovery in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Practice, Procedures, Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Esmé Shirlow","doi":"10.1093/JNLIDS/IDAA019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Document production, and with it e-discovery, presents unique opportunities but also challenges for parties and tribunals seeking fair, efficient and effective investor-state arbitration proceedings. Despite the prevalence of electronically stored information and the potential utility of technology-assisted review techniques, e-discovery procedures in investor-state arbitration are relatively underdeveloped. Applicable procedural rules and guidelines are largely silent as to the mechanics of e-discovery. Analysis of investor-state arbitration decisions indicates a further reticence on the part of parties and investor-state tribunals to squarely address issues of e-discovery proactively. This means that the use, selection and scope of e-discovery are left almost entirely to parties and tribunals to navigate on a case-by-case and largely ad hoc basis. Given the likely increasing relevance of e-discovery in international investor-state arbitration, this article considers how parties and tribunals might be supported to become better equipped to accommodate e-discovery appropriately in investor-state arbitration.","PeriodicalId":44660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","volume":"14 1","pages":"549-588"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JNLIDS/IDAA019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Document production, and with it e-discovery, presents unique opportunities but also challenges for parties and tribunals seeking fair, efficient and effective investor-state arbitration proceedings. Despite the prevalence of electronically stored information and the potential utility of technology-assisted review techniques, e-discovery procedures in investor-state arbitration are relatively underdeveloped. Applicable procedural rules and guidelines are largely silent as to the mechanics of e-discovery. Analysis of investor-state arbitration decisions indicates a further reticence on the part of parties and investor-state tribunals to squarely address issues of e-discovery proactively. This means that the use, selection and scope of e-discovery are left almost entirely to parties and tribunals to navigate on a case-by-case and largely ad hoc basis. Given the likely increasing relevance of e-discovery in international investor-state arbitration, this article considers how parties and tribunals might be supported to become better equipped to accommodate e-discovery appropriately in investor-state arbitration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资条约仲裁中的电子发现:实践、程序、挑战与机遇
文件制作及其电子取证为寻求公平、高效和有效的投资者-国家仲裁程序的当事人和法庭提供了独特的机会,但也带来了挑战。尽管电子存储信息的普及和技术辅助审查技术的潜在效用,投资者与国家仲裁中的电子发现程序相对不发达。适用的程序规则和指导方针在很大程度上对电子发现的机制保持沉默。对投资者-国家仲裁裁决的分析表明,当事人和投资者-国家法庭在积极主动地解决电子发现问题方面进一步保持沉默。这意味着电子证据的使用、选择和范围几乎完全由当事人和法庭根据具体情况和很大程度上的特殊情况来决定。鉴于电子证据开示在投资者与国家之间的国际仲裁中可能越来越重要,本文考虑了如何支持当事人和法庭更好地适应投资者与国家之间仲裁中的电子证据开示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the ‘author’ of international law — The ‘legal effect’ of ICJ’s advisory opinions Continental shelf delimitation beyond 200 nautical miles: Mauritius/Maldives and the forking paths in the jurisprudence The legitimation of international adjudication Reflecting on the rule of law contestations narratives in the world trading system When the Dragon comes Home to Roost: Chinese Investments in the EU, National Security, and Investor–State Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1