Social Isolation and Online Relationship-Risk Encounters among Adolescents with Special Educational Needs

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Youth Development Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.3390/youth3020044
Aiman El-Asam, Lara Jane Colley-Chahal, Adrienne Katz
{"title":"Social Isolation and Online Relationship-Risk Encounters among Adolescents with Special Educational Needs","authors":"Aiman El-Asam, Lara Jane Colley-Chahal, Adrienne Katz","doi":"10.3390/youth3020044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While all vulnerable adolescents are more at risk online than their non-vulnerable peers, those with special educational needs (SEN) require targeted and specialised support. Although they are not a homogenous group, SEN adolescents commonly experience social isolation and a lack of connection or meaningful relationships with peers in their offline lives. Many perceive the internet as a route to alternative means of communicating and interacting with others. Accessibility tools enable autonomous access to the online world, which offers support groups, new friends, entertainment, and connections. This can lead to both potential online relationship-risk encounters and positive experiences. With the attraction of online environments comes the need for digital skills and awarness of possible online risks, yet for adolescents with SEN, their difficulties dictate a need for more than rules, controls, and digital skills. In this study, 4894 adolescents aged 13 to 17, of whom 1207 had SEN, completed the Cybersurvey 2019, an online questionnaire about their digital life. Adolescents were asked about the benefits of using the internet, their online safety support, offline social support, and any online relationship-risk encounters. All participants were recruited through their schools. Descriptive statistics and multiple analysis of variance tests showed that, compared with their peers, adolescents with SEN experienced significantly more social isolation and less parental online safety support. They were also more likely to use the internet for positive purposes, such as socialising and coping. Overall, adolescents with SEN encountered more online relationship risks than their non-SEN peers, with older teens more likely to encounter such risks than younger peers, regardless of their SEN status. Multiple analysis of variance tests also identified that boys perceive internet use as positive to a greater extent than girls, suggesting a gender difference in experiences of the digital environment. A multiple linear hierarchical regression revealed that SEN status, age, social isolation, poor parental online safety support, and greater perceived positive internet use, all significantly predicted online relationship-risk encounters. This article discusses important implications and recommendations for policy and practice related to SEN and online safety and highlights areas for future research to consider.","PeriodicalId":46087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/youth3020044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While all vulnerable adolescents are more at risk online than their non-vulnerable peers, those with special educational needs (SEN) require targeted and specialised support. Although they are not a homogenous group, SEN adolescents commonly experience social isolation and a lack of connection or meaningful relationships with peers in their offline lives. Many perceive the internet as a route to alternative means of communicating and interacting with others. Accessibility tools enable autonomous access to the online world, which offers support groups, new friends, entertainment, and connections. This can lead to both potential online relationship-risk encounters and positive experiences. With the attraction of online environments comes the need for digital skills and awarness of possible online risks, yet for adolescents with SEN, their difficulties dictate a need for more than rules, controls, and digital skills. In this study, 4894 adolescents aged 13 to 17, of whom 1207 had SEN, completed the Cybersurvey 2019, an online questionnaire about their digital life. Adolescents were asked about the benefits of using the internet, their online safety support, offline social support, and any online relationship-risk encounters. All participants were recruited through their schools. Descriptive statistics and multiple analysis of variance tests showed that, compared with their peers, adolescents with SEN experienced significantly more social isolation and less parental online safety support. They were also more likely to use the internet for positive purposes, such as socialising and coping. Overall, adolescents with SEN encountered more online relationship risks than their non-SEN peers, with older teens more likely to encounter such risks than younger peers, regardless of their SEN status. Multiple analysis of variance tests also identified that boys perceive internet use as positive to a greater extent than girls, suggesting a gender difference in experiences of the digital environment. A multiple linear hierarchical regression revealed that SEN status, age, social isolation, poor parental online safety support, and greater perceived positive internet use, all significantly predicted online relationship-risk encounters. This article discusses important implications and recommendations for policy and practice related to SEN and online safety and highlights areas for future research to consider.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有特殊教育需要的青少年的社会孤立和网络关系风险遭遇
虽然所有弱势青少年在网络上面临的风险都高于非弱势青少年,但那些有特殊教育需求的青少年需要有针对性的专门支持。虽然他们不是一个同质群体,但SEN青少年通常经历社会孤立,在线下生活中缺乏与同龄人的联系或有意义的关系。许多人认为互联网是与他人交流和互动的另一种方式。可访问性工具可以自主访问在线世界,提供支持小组、新朋友、娱乐和联系。这可能会导致潜在的在线关系风险遭遇和积极的体验。随着网络环境的吸引力而来的是对数字技能的需求和对可能的网络风险的认识,然而对于有特殊教育需要的青少年来说,他们的困难决定了他们需要的不仅仅是规则、控制和数字技能。在这项研究中,4894名13至17岁的青少年完成了2019年网络调查,这是一份关于他们数字生活的在线问卷。青少年被问及使用互联网的好处、他们的在线安全支持、线下社会支持以及任何在线关系风险遭遇。所有的参与者都是通过他们的学校招募的。描述性统计和多元方差分析检验表明,与同龄人相比,有特殊教育障碍的青少年经历了更多的社会孤立和更少的父母在线安全支持。他们也更有可能将互联网用于积极的目的,比如社交和应对。总体而言,有特殊学习障碍的青少年比没有特殊学习障碍的同龄人遇到更多的网络关系风险,年龄较大的青少年比年龄较小的青少年更有可能遇到这种风险,无论他们的特殊学习障碍状况如何。多元方差分析测试还发现,男孩比女孩更认为互联网使用是积极的,这表明数字环境的体验存在性别差异。多元线性层次回归显示,SEN状态、年龄、社会孤立、父母在线安全支持差以及更多的感知到的积极互联网使用,都显著预测了在线关系风险遭遇。本文讨论了与SEN和在线安全相关的政策和实践的重要含义和建议,并强调了未来研究需要考虑的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth Development
Journal of Youth Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Friendship: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of European Youth Work Policy “I Don’t Feel Like There’s Enough Awareness about the Damage That Social Media Does”: A Thematic Analysis of the Relationships between Social Media Use, Mental Wellbeing, and Care Experience “It Feels like You’re a Stranger in Your Own Skin”: Young People’s Accounts of Everyday Embodiment “Only Time Will Tell”: The Underexplored Impacts of Lead Poisoning and COVID-19 on Pre-Existing ACEs in New York Outcomes beyond Evaluation: The Impetus and Measure of Relationships within Alternative Provisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1