Peithō and Logos in Aeschylus's Eumenides 778–891

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Res Rhetorica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/rht.2023.0000
Allannah Karas
{"title":"Peithō and Logos in Aeschylus's Eumenides 778–891","authors":"Allannah Karas","doi":"10.1353/rht.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In early Greek theoretical descriptions of rhetoric peithō and logos both emerge as crucial elements. However, historical scholarship on rhetoric has generally focused on logos at the cost of any sufficient understanding of peithō. This essay examines peithō within a text that predates the descriptions of rhetoric formulated by Gorgias, Plato, and Aristotle—Aeschylus's Oresteia. I argue that, throughout the speeches of Athena at Eumenides 778-891, Aeschylus displays highly sophisticated argumentative techniques (forms of logos) that anticipate principles outlined in Aristotle's Rhetoric. At the same time, Aeschylus highlights peithō as an essential characteristic of Athena's rhetorical effectiveness. In so doing, Aeschylus prepares the way (in practice) for what Greek sophists and philosophers will later articulate (in theory): that logos and peithō are inseparable and equally important components of effective rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":40200,"journal":{"name":"Res Rhetorica","volume":"3 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Rhetorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2023.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In early Greek theoretical descriptions of rhetoric peithō and logos both emerge as crucial elements. However, historical scholarship on rhetoric has generally focused on logos at the cost of any sufficient understanding of peithō. This essay examines peithō within a text that predates the descriptions of rhetoric formulated by Gorgias, Plato, and Aristotle—Aeschylus's Oresteia. I argue that, throughout the speeches of Athena at Eumenides 778-891, Aeschylus displays highly sophisticated argumentative techniques (forms of logos) that anticipate principles outlined in Aristotle's Rhetoric. At the same time, Aeschylus highlights peithō as an essential characteristic of Athena's rhetorical effectiveness. In so doing, Aeschylus prepares the way (in practice) for what Greek sophists and philosophers will later articulate (in theory): that logos and peithō are inseparable and equally important components of effective rhetoric.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要:在早期希腊修辞学的理论描述中,“理”和“理”都是至关重要的两个要素。然而,修辞学的历史研究一般都集中在逻各斯上,而忽略了对理性的充分理解。这篇文章考察了在戈尔吉亚、柏拉图和亚里士多德的《埃斯库罗斯的俄瑞斯忒亚》中对修辞的描述之前的一篇文章中的peithku。我认为,在欧门尼德斯778-891年雅典娜的演讲中,埃斯库罗斯展示了高度复杂的辩论技巧(逻各斯的形式),这些技巧预测了亚里士多德《修辞学》中概述的原则。与此同时,埃斯库罗斯强调了雅典娜修辞效果的本质特征。这样做,埃斯库罗斯(在实践中)为希腊诡辩家和哲学家后来(在理论上)阐明的东西铺平了道路:逻各斯和佩思是不可分割的,是有效修辞的同等重要的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Res Rhetorica
Res Rhetorica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Eufonia, sensoryka i intertekstualność w komunikacji perswazyjnej na przykładzie tekstu z pogranicza kultur – J 8, 1-11 Wojenna retoryka przemocy w konflikcie rosyjsko-ukraińskim Retor o barbarzyńcach, barbarzyńcy o retoryce – przybysze z dalekich krajów w utworach Lukiana z Samosat Recenzja/Review: Ofer Feldman (ed.), Debasing Political Rhetoric: Dissing Opponents, Journalists, and Minorities in Populist Leadership, Springer 2023 and Ofer Feldman (ed.), Political Debasement: Incivility, Contempt, and Humiliation in Parliamentary and Public Discourse, Springer 2023 „Z takimi patronami można iść na koniec świata”. Strategie retoryczne stosowane w crowdfundingu na wybranych przykładach z serwisu Patronite.pl
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1