EFL University Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy and Its Correlation with Their Reading Comprehension

Zhafirah Rosa Kusumawardana, Suvi Akhiriyah
{"title":"EFL University Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy and Its Correlation with Their Reading Comprehension","authors":"Zhafirah Rosa Kusumawardana, Suvi Akhiriyah","doi":"10.31764/leltj.v10i1.8879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy has a tremendous impact on the educational process, especially in acquiring a second language. It is concerned with not only what they suggest about how students organize their interactions with the context, but also with how they might employ the strategies that are still relevant to reading comprehension effectiveness. However, the EFL learners are still having a lack using metacognitive awareness of reading strategies significantly because of unknowing and inadequate understanding of what reading strategies to use, how and when to use them appropriately. Hence, the present study is attempted to locate the relationship between EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy and reading comprehension. A quantitative study, with 60 EFL students as participants, was conducted by using a questionnaire, and reading comprehension score to discover the level of EFL students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy. Those are the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory - revised (MARSI-R) and the Test English Proficiency (TEP) to discover the level of EFL students’ metacognitive awareness. The result of this study showed that 49 participants (mean 3.5 – >3.5), categorized as high group levels, and 11 participants (mean 2.5 – 3.4), categorized as moderate group levels. This research also revealed that the most strategies used by EFL learners found using PRS (Problem-solving strategies) M = 3.99; GRS (Global reading strategies) M = 3.98; and, SRS (Support reading strategies) M = 3.65. For the result of the Spearman Rho Coefficient showed that there is no correlation between EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy and reading comprehension (ρ value = .986).","PeriodicalId":30946,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian EFL Journal Journal of ELT Linguistics and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian EFL Journal Journal of ELT Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i1.8879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy has a tremendous impact on the educational process, especially in acquiring a second language. It is concerned with not only what they suggest about how students organize their interactions with the context, but also with how they might employ the strategies that are still relevant to reading comprehension effectiveness. However, the EFL learners are still having a lack using metacognitive awareness of reading strategies significantly because of unknowing and inadequate understanding of what reading strategies to use, how and when to use them appropriately. Hence, the present study is attempted to locate the relationship between EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy and reading comprehension. A quantitative study, with 60 EFL students as participants, was conducted by using a questionnaire, and reading comprehension score to discover the level of EFL students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy. Those are the Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategy Inventory - revised (MARSI-R) and the Test English Proficiency (TEP) to discover the level of EFL students’ metacognitive awareness. The result of this study showed that 49 participants (mean 3.5 – >3.5), categorized as high group levels, and 11 participants (mean 2.5 – 3.4), categorized as moderate group levels. This research also revealed that the most strategies used by EFL learners found using PRS (Problem-solving strategies) M = 3.99; GRS (Global reading strategies) M = 3.98; and, SRS (Support reading strategies) M = 3.65. For the result of the Spearman Rho Coefficient showed that there is no correlation between EFL learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategy and reading comprehension (ρ value = .986).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语大学生阅读策略元认知意识及其与阅读理解的关系
阅读策略的元认知意识对教育过程,尤其是对二语习得的影响是巨大的。它不仅涉及他们对学生如何组织与上下文的互动的建议,而且还涉及他们如何使用仍然与阅读理解有效性相关的策略。然而,英语学习者对阅读策略的元认知意识仍然明显缺乏,主要原因是对使用何种阅读策略、如何使用阅读策略以及何时使用阅读策略缺乏充分的认识和认识。因此,本研究试图确定英语学习者的阅读策略元认知意识与阅读理解之间的关系。本研究以60名英语学生为研究对象,采用问卷调查法和阅读理解评分法对英语学生的阅读策略元认知意识水平进行了定量研究。即阅读策略元认知意识量表(MARSI-R)和英语水平测试(TEP),以发现EFL学生的元认知意识水平。本研究结果显示,49名参与者(平均3.5 - >3.5)被归类为高组水平,11名参与者(平均2.5 - 3.4)被归类为中等组水平。本研究还发现,英语学习者使用最多的策略是使用PRS(问题解决策略)M = 3.99;GRS (Global reading strategies) M = 3.98;SRS (Support reading strategies) M = 3.65。Spearman Rho系数的结果显示,英语学习者的阅读策略元认知意识与阅读理解之间没有相关性(ρ值= .986)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
EXPLORING IMPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE The Impact of Project-Based Learning on English Subject for Third Semester Students of Indonesian Education Study program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Borneo, Tarakan Analysis of Online Learning Media and Its Usage in English Learning in SMA Negeri in Tarakan Gender Difference and Errors in Writing Narrative Texts among Indonesian EFL College Students Phonological Analysis in Delivering Stories through Video Recording
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1