Why "Red bread mold" is an inappropriate name for Neurospora

D. D. Perkins
{"title":"Why \"Red bread mold\" is an inappropriate name for Neurospora","authors":"D. D. Perkins","doi":"10.4148/1941-4765.1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If an organism is already well known to the public before scientists adopt it for research, the popular, vernacular name usually continues to be used. Examples are yeast for Saccharomyces, mouse for Mus, corn for Zea mays, and silkworm for Bombyx. These common n ames are we ll established, and us ers are g enerally comfortable wi th t hem. H owever, some wi dely used r esearch organisms happen to have acquired popular names that are clearly inaccurate or misleading. Such has been the fate of Drosophila and Neurospora. Melvin Green (2002) has protested the use of \"fruit fly\" for Drosophila, pointing out that the name does not apply for the many Drosophila species that use substrates other than fruit, and that it leads to confusion with the Mediterranean fruit fly, a serious agricultural pest. He urges that the popular name fruit fly be abandoned and that the scientific name Drosophila be used in all scientific literature and in textbooks. As with the name fruit fly for Drosophila, objection can be made to using red bread mold for Neurospora. The vernacular name is imprecise and misleading in two respects, regarding both color and substrate. As to color, homothallic Neurospora species are devoid of conidia and of visible carotenoid pigments, while N. crassa and other conidiating species, which do display carotenoids, are orange or yellow-orange rather than red. When dark-grown cultures of a conidiating Neurospora species are first brought into the light, they are colorless. Then, within an hour, they become pigmented. The initial blush of color is pink or red, but this is quickly transformed to orange. The ephemeral red stage, which is rarely seen and is probably unknown to most observers, seems a poor choice for naming the organism. As to substrate, N eurospora exi sted for mi llions of years on nat ural substrates, in t he ab sence of human art ifacts. Calling Neurospora a bread mold might be considered an example of anthropocentric arrogance. Although Neurospora is able to grow profusely on bread, and was first recorded as a nuisance in bakeries (Payen 1843; see Perkins 1991), its occurrence is rare compared to other contaminating molds, especially since antifungal agents were introduced and bakery sanitation was improved. I have myself seen many examples of moldy bread that was black or green, but never one that was orange or red.","PeriodicalId":12490,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Genetics Reports","volume":"2 1","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Genetics Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.1121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

If an organism is already well known to the public before scientists adopt it for research, the popular, vernacular name usually continues to be used. Examples are yeast for Saccharomyces, mouse for Mus, corn for Zea mays, and silkworm for Bombyx. These common n ames are we ll established, and us ers are g enerally comfortable wi th t hem. H owever, some wi dely used r esearch organisms happen to have acquired popular names that are clearly inaccurate or misleading. Such has been the fate of Drosophila and Neurospora. Melvin Green (2002) has protested the use of "fruit fly" for Drosophila, pointing out that the name does not apply for the many Drosophila species that use substrates other than fruit, and that it leads to confusion with the Mediterranean fruit fly, a serious agricultural pest. He urges that the popular name fruit fly be abandoned and that the scientific name Drosophila be used in all scientific literature and in textbooks. As with the name fruit fly for Drosophila, objection can be made to using red bread mold for Neurospora. The vernacular name is imprecise and misleading in two respects, regarding both color and substrate. As to color, homothallic Neurospora species are devoid of conidia and of visible carotenoid pigments, while N. crassa and other conidiating species, which do display carotenoids, are orange or yellow-orange rather than red. When dark-grown cultures of a conidiating Neurospora species are first brought into the light, they are colorless. Then, within an hour, they become pigmented. The initial blush of color is pink or red, but this is quickly transformed to orange. The ephemeral red stage, which is rarely seen and is probably unknown to most observers, seems a poor choice for naming the organism. As to substrate, N eurospora exi sted for mi llions of years on nat ural substrates, in t he ab sence of human art ifacts. Calling Neurospora a bread mold might be considered an example of anthropocentric arrogance. Although Neurospora is able to grow profusely on bread, and was first recorded as a nuisance in bakeries (Payen 1843; see Perkins 1991), its occurrence is rare compared to other contaminating molds, especially since antifungal agents were introduced and bakery sanitation was improved. I have myself seen many examples of moldy bread that was black or green, but never one that was orange or red.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么“红面包霉菌”对神经孢子虫来说是一个不恰当的名字
如果一种生物在科学家采用它进行研究之前已经为公众所熟知,那么通常会继续使用流行的、方言的名称。例如酵母菌的酵母,Mus的老鼠,Zea mays的玉米,Bombyx的蚕。这些常见的名字是我们已经建立起来的,我们的用户通常对它们很满意。然而,一些被广泛用于研究的生物碰巧获得了明显不准确或具有误导性的流行名称。这就是果蝇和神经孢子虫的命运。Melvin Green(2002)对使用“果蝇”来称呼果蝇提出了抗议,他指出,这个名称并不适用于许多使用水果以外的基质的果蝇物种,而且它会导致与地中海果蝇(一种严重的农业害虫)的混淆。他敦促人们放弃“果蝇”这个通俗名称,并在所有科学文献和教科书中使用“果蝇”这个学名。就像果蝇被命名为果蝇一样,对神经孢子虫被命名为红面包霉菌也有异议。白话的名字在两个方面是不精确和误导的,关于颜色和衬底。在颜色方面,同thallic Neurospora物种缺乏分生孢子和可见的类胡萝卜素色素,而N. crassa和其他有分生孢子的物种确实显示类胡萝卜素,但它们是橙色或黄橙色而不是红色。当暗生长的分生神经孢子菌种的培养物第一次被带到光线下时,它们是无色的。然后,在一个小时内,它们就会变成色素。最初的腮红是粉红色或红色,但很快就变成了橙色。短暂的红色阶段很少见到,大多数观察者可能都不知道,作为这种生物的命名似乎不太合适。在基质方面,氮孢菌在自然基质上存在了数百万年,在人类艺术品的意义上。将神经孢子虫称为面包霉菌可能被认为是人类中心主义傲慢的一个例子。虽然神经孢子虫能够在面包上大量生长,但最初被记录为面包店的滋事(Payen 1843;见Perkins 1991),与其他污染霉菌相比,它的发生是罕见的,特别是自从引入抗真菌剂和面包店卫生得到改善以来。我自己也见过很多发霉的面包是黑色或绿色的,但从来没有一个是橙色或红色的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predicting the Identities of su(met-2) and met-3 in Neurospora crassa by Genome Resequencing On computing relative effective population size estimates and parameters from an equilibrium cycle of hermaphrodite frequency fluctuation due to mixed reproductive modes in filamentous fungi Relative efficiency of split-marker versus double-crossover replacement protocols for production of deletion mutants in strain PH-1 of Fusarium graminearum Genetic Analysis and Mapping of Avirulence Genes in Magnaporthe grisea Somatic Recombination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1