Are neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor performance the same for the different types of temporomandibular disorders?

IF 3.3 4区计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-18 DOI:10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582

Luiz Felipe Tavares, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Bruna Guimaraes Carvalho, Ana Paula Mendonça Fernandes, Jade Padilha Silva, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Erika Oliveira Almeida, Karyna Figueiredo Ribeiro

{"title":"Are neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor performance the same for the different types of temporomandibular disorders?","authors":"Luiz Felipe Tavares, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Bruna Guimaraes Carvalho, Ana Paula Mendonça Fernandes, Jade Padilha Silva, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Erika Oliveira Almeida, Karyna Figueiredo Ribeiro","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor (DNF) performance of individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).Methods: Eighty individuals were divided into the following: arthrogenic TMD (n = 40), myogenic TMD (n = 12), and mixed TMD (n = 28). Neck pain intensity, neck disability, and DNF performance were evaluated.Results: Individuals with arthrogenic TMD reported lower intensity of neck pain when compared to mixed TMD (p = 0.01). Individuals with arthrogenic TMD had less neck disability than individuals with myogenic TMD (p = 0.037) and mixed TMD (p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between neck pain and neck disability (p < 0.001). No differences were found for DNF performance.Conclusion: Neck pain and disability differs according to subtype of TMD, but performance of the deep neck flexors does not. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were correlated in patients with TMD.","PeriodicalId":49313,"journal":{"name":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","volume":"14 1","pages":"770-778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor (DNF) performance of individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Methods: Eighty individuals were divided into the following: arthrogenic TMD (n = 40), myogenic TMD (n = 12), and mixed TMD (n = 28). Neck pain intensity, neck disability, and DNF performance were evaluated.

Results: Individuals with arthrogenic TMD reported lower intensity of neck pain when compared to mixed TMD (p = 0.01). Individuals with arthrogenic TMD had less neck disability than individuals with myogenic TMD (p = 0.037) and mixed TMD (p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between neck pain and neck disability (p < 0.001). No differences were found for DNF performance.

Conclusion: Neck pain and disability differs according to subtype of TMD, but performance of the deep neck flexors does not. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were correlated in patients with TMD.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

不同类型的颞下颌关节紊乱症的颈部疼痛、残疾和颈深屈肌表现是否相同？

目的评估颞下颌关节紊乱症（TMD）患者的颈部疼痛、残疾和颈深屈肌（DNF）功能：将 80 名患者分为：关节源性 TMD（40 人）、肌源性 TMD（12 人）和混合型 TMD（28 人）。对颈部疼痛强度、颈部残疾和 DNF 表现进行评估：结果：与混合型 TMD 相比，关节源性 TMD 患者的颈部疼痛强度较低（p = 0.01）。关节源性 TMD 患者的颈部残疾程度低于肌源性 TMD 患者（p = 0.037）和混合型 TMD 患者（p p 结论：不同类型的关节源性 TMD 患者颈部疼痛和残疾程度不同：颈部疼痛和颈部残疾因 TMD 亚型而异，但颈部深屈肌的表现却不尽相同。TMD 患者的颈部疼痛强度与颈部残疾程度相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-TELECOMMUNICATIONS

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

7.10%

发文量

145

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： The aim of the Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications journal is to disseminate state-of-the-art research and development results in this rapidly growing research area, to facilitate the deployment of P2P networking and applications, and to bring together the academic and industry communities, with the goal of fostering interaction to promote further research interests and activities, thus enabling new P2P applications and services. The journal not only addresses research topics related to networking and communications theory, but also considers the standardization, economic, and engineering aspects of P2P technologies, and their impacts on software engineering, computer engineering, networked communication, and security. The journal serves as a forum for tackling the technical problems arising from both file sharing and media streaming applications. It also includes state-of-the-art technologies in the P2P security domain. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications publishes regular papers, tutorials and review papers, case studies, and correspondence from the research, development, and standardization communities. Papers addressing system, application, and service issues are encouraged.