Energy consumption of track-based high-speed trains: maglev systems in comparison with wheel-rail systems

E. Fritz, Larry Blow, Johannes Kluhspies, R. Kircher, Michael H. Witt
{"title":"Energy consumption of track-based high-speed trains: maglev systems in comparison with wheel-rail systems","authors":"E. Fritz, Larry Blow, Johannes Kluhspies, R. Kircher, Michael H. Witt","doi":"10.17816/TRANSSYST201843S1134-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The energy consumption of a high-speed system is an important part of its total operational costs. This paper compares the secondary energy demand of different wheel-rail systems, such as ICE, TGV and Shinkansen, and maglev systems, such as Transrapid and Chuo Shinkansen. \nIn the past, energy values of systems with different conditions (train configuration, dimension, capacity, maximum speed) were frequently compared. The comparative values were often represented by the specific energy consumption based on passenger capacity and line-kilometer values. \nAim: The goal is to find a way to compare the specific energy consumption of different high-speed systems without any distortion of results. \nMethods: A comparison of energy values based on normative usable areas inside the high-speed systems will be described and evaluated in this paper, transforming the results to a more distortion-free comparison of energy consumption of different systems. \nResults: The results show the energy consumption as an important characteristic parameter of high-speed transportation systems based on an objective comparison and give ranges of expected energy demand of different systems dependent on maximum speed level. \nConclusion: Up to the design speed of wheel-rail systems there are slight advantages in terms of energy consumption for the Transrapid maglev. From the perspective of energy consumption under consideration to reduce travel time, high-speed maglev systems represent a promising option for new railway projects. However, a project-specific system decision must be based on a complete life-cycle cost analysis, including investment cost","PeriodicalId":100849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/TRANSSYST201843S1134-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The energy consumption of a high-speed system is an important part of its total operational costs. This paper compares the secondary energy demand of different wheel-rail systems, such as ICE, TGV and Shinkansen, and maglev systems, such as Transrapid and Chuo Shinkansen. In the past, energy values of systems with different conditions (train configuration, dimension, capacity, maximum speed) were frequently compared. The comparative values were often represented by the specific energy consumption based on passenger capacity and line-kilometer values. Aim: The goal is to find a way to compare the specific energy consumption of different high-speed systems without any distortion of results. Methods: A comparison of energy values based on normative usable areas inside the high-speed systems will be described and evaluated in this paper, transforming the results to a more distortion-free comparison of energy consumption of different systems. Results: The results show the energy consumption as an important characteristic parameter of high-speed transportation systems based on an objective comparison and give ranges of expected energy demand of different systems dependent on maximum speed level. Conclusion: Up to the design speed of wheel-rail systems there are slight advantages in terms of energy consumption for the Transrapid maglev. From the perspective of energy consumption under consideration to reduce travel time, high-speed maglev systems represent a promising option for new railway projects. However, a project-specific system decision must be based on a complete life-cycle cost analysis, including investment cost
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于轨道的高速列车的能源消耗:磁悬浮系统与轮轨系统的比较
背景:高速系统的能耗是其总运行成本的重要组成部分。本文比较了不同轮轨系统(如ICE、TGV和新干线)和磁悬浮系统(如Transrapid和中央新干线)的二次能源需求。过去,经常比较不同条件(列车配置、尺寸、容量、最大速度)下系统的能量值。比较值通常由基于载客量和线路公里数的比能耗来表示。目的:目的是找到一种方法来比较不同高速系统的比能耗,而不扭曲结果。方法:基于高速系统内部规范可用区域的能量值比较将在本文中进行描述和评估,将结果转化为不同系统能耗的更无失真的比较。结果:通过客观比较,得出了能量消耗是高速运输系统的重要特征参数,并给出了不同系统在最高速度水平下的预期能量需求范围。结论:在轮轨系统的设计速度范围内,高速磁悬浮在能耗方面有一定的优势。从能源消耗的角度考虑,以减少旅行时间,高速磁悬浮系统代表了一个有前途的新铁路项目的选择。然而,特定于项目的系统决策必须基于完整的生命周期成本分析,包括投资成本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Roundabout Metering on the Operational Performance of Roundabout: A Case Study of Jawalakhel, Nepal Optimizing Performance at Signalized Intersections through Signal Coordination in Two Intersections of Nepal A Review on the Development and Need of Bicycle Level of Service A Feasibility Study of Public Transport of Panna City Madhya Pradesh A Review on Problems Faced Due to Poor Transportation Facilities in Small Urban Cities in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1