An empirical investigation of coaching ingredients: the role of the coach-coachee relationship in influencing coaching outcomes

Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI:10.1080/17521882.2021.1979612
Janette S. Williams
{"title":"An empirical investigation of coaching ingredients: the role of the coach-coachee relationship in influencing coaching outcomes","authors":"Janette S. Williams","doi":"10.1080/17521882.2021.1979612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT An important issue in coaching research is determining the role of the coach-coachee relationship in influencing outcomes. Although some studies have found that the relationship is a predictor of outcomes, others have reported contrary findings. Using random assignment and a switching-replication design, this study had two aims: first, to examine the alignment (i.e., perception, evaluation) of the relationship during the coaching; and second, to determine if the alignment of the relationship influences coaching outcomes. The relationship measures included the working alliance and goal-focused coaching, as rated by the coach and the coachee. The coachee’s direct supervisor rated the coaching outcome measured by a leadership-behaviour assessment. The research studied fifty-six coaching dyads who engaged in four face-to-face, 1-hr coaching sessions over a 4- to 6-week period. The results showed that the coaches’ and coachees’ evaluation of the coaching relationship became less, rather than more, aligned across time. Further examination showed the alignment of the relationship (goal-focused or relationship satisfaction) did not influence the coaching outcome, as rated by the supervisors. Implications of the results for coaching theory, research, and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521882.2021.1979612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT An important issue in coaching research is determining the role of the coach-coachee relationship in influencing outcomes. Although some studies have found that the relationship is a predictor of outcomes, others have reported contrary findings. Using random assignment and a switching-replication design, this study had two aims: first, to examine the alignment (i.e., perception, evaluation) of the relationship during the coaching; and second, to determine if the alignment of the relationship influences coaching outcomes. The relationship measures included the working alliance and goal-focused coaching, as rated by the coach and the coachee. The coachee’s direct supervisor rated the coaching outcome measured by a leadership-behaviour assessment. The research studied fifty-six coaching dyads who engaged in four face-to-face, 1-hr coaching sessions over a 4- to 6-week period. The results showed that the coaches’ and coachees’ evaluation of the coaching relationship became less, rather than more, aligned across time. Further examination showed the alignment of the relationship (goal-focused or relationship satisfaction) did not influence the coaching outcome, as rated by the supervisors. Implications of the results for coaching theory, research, and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
教练成分的实证研究:教练员与教练员关系对教练结果的影响
摘要教练员与教练员之间的关系在影响结果中的作用是教练员研究中的一个重要问题。尽管一些研究发现,这种关系可以预测结果,但也有研究报告了相反的结果。本研究采用随机分配和切换-复制设计,有两个目的:第一,检查在教练期间的关系的一致性(即感知,评价);第二,确定这种关系的一致性是否会影响教练的结果。关系测量包括工作联盟和目标导向教练,由教练和被教练评定。教练的直接主管通过领导行为评估来评估教练的结果。这项研究对56对教练进行了研究,他们在4到6周的时间里参加了4次面对面的、1小时的教练课程。结果表明,随着时间的推移,教练员和教练员对教练关系的评价变得越来越不一致,而不是越来越一致。进一步的检查显示,关系的一致性(目标聚焦或关系满意度)并不影响指导结果,正如主管们所评价的那样。讨论了研究结果对教练理论、研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1