Brittany A. Ernst , George C. Banks , Andrew C. Loignon , Katherine A. Frear , Courtney E. Williams , Luis M. Arciniega , Roopak K. Gupta , Georg Kodydek , Dilip Subramanian
{"title":"Virtual charismatic leadership and signaling theory: A prospective meta-analysis in five countries","authors":"Brittany A. Ernst , George C. Banks , Andrew C. Loignon , Katherine A. Frear , Courtney E. Williams , Luis M. Arciniega , Roopak K. Gupta , Georg Kodydek , Dilip Subramanian","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Drawing upon signaling theory, charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been identified as a trainable set of skills. Although organizations rely on technology-mediated communication, the effects of CLTs have not been examined in a virtual context. Preregistered experiments were conducted in face-to-face (Study 1; </span><em>n</em> = 121) and virtual settings (Study 2; <em>n</em> = 128) in the United States. In Study 3, we conducted virtual replications in Austria (<em>n</em> = 134), France (<em>n</em> = 137), India (<em>n</em> = 128), and Mexico (<em>n</em> = 124). Combined with past experiments, the meta-analytic effect of CLTs on performance (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.52 in-person, <em>k</em> = 4; Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.21 overall, <em>k</em> = 10) and engagement in an extra-role task (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.19 overall; <em>k</em> = 6) indicate large to moderate effects. Yet, for performance in a virtual context Cohen’s <em>d</em> ranged from −0.25 to 0.17 (Cohen’s <em>d</em> = 0.01 overall; <em>k</em> = 6). Study 4 (<em>n</em> = 129) provided mixed support for signaling theory in a virtual context, linking CLTs to some positive evaluations. We conclude with guidance for future research on charismatic leadership and signaling theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"33 5","pages":"Article 101541"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101541","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000461","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Drawing upon signaling theory, charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been identified as a trainable set of skills. Although organizations rely on technology-mediated communication, the effects of CLTs have not been examined in a virtual context. Preregistered experiments were conducted in face-to-face (Study 1; n = 121) and virtual settings (Study 2; n = 128) in the United States. In Study 3, we conducted virtual replications in Austria (n = 134), France (n = 137), India (n = 128), and Mexico (n = 124). Combined with past experiments, the meta-analytic effect of CLTs on performance (Cohen’s d = 0.52 in-person, k = 4; Cohen’s d = 0.21 overall, k = 10) and engagement in an extra-role task (Cohen’s d = 0.19 overall; k = 6) indicate large to moderate effects. Yet, for performance in a virtual context Cohen’s d ranged from −0.25 to 0.17 (Cohen’s d = 0.01 overall; k = 6). Study 4 (n = 129) provided mixed support for signaling theory in a virtual context, linking CLTs to some positive evaluations. We conclude with guidance for future research on charismatic leadership and signaling theory.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.