How do academics, regulators, and treatment providers think that safer gambling messages can be improved?

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES Addiction Research & Theory Pub Date : 2022-11-20 DOI:10.1080/16066359.2022.2148663
P. Newall, M. Rockloff, N. Hing, Matthew Browne, H. Thorne, A. Russell, Tess Armstrong
{"title":"How do academics, regulators, and treatment providers think that safer gambling messages can be improved?","authors":"P. Newall, M. Rockloff, N. Hing, Matthew Browne, H. Thorne, A. Russell, Tess Armstrong","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2148663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Safer gambling messages are a common public health intervention for gambling, and yet there is little evidence to support the variety of messages that are in widespread use. This paper thematically analyzed the perspectives of 21 participants – including academics, regulators and treatment providers – regarding the design characteristics of safer-gambling messages with the goal to improve on those already being used. The focus groups were semi-structured and discussed exemplar messages based on five areas of previous gambling research: teaching safer gambling practices, correcting gambling misperceptions, boosting conscious decision making, norm-based messages, and emotional messages. Five themes were supported by the three focus groups, including that messages: may be insufficient to change behavior; should respect the diversity amongst gamblers; should not contribute to gambling stigma; should provide norm-based information thoughtfully; and should trigger only positive and not negative emotions. These findings can be useful in developing messages that are based on themes endorsed by experts as being relevant to the design of effective safer-gambling messages. Generating a pool of messages that are evidence based is likely to improve on current messages, thus serving as a useful public health tool for promoting safer-gambling involvement.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2148663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Safer gambling messages are a common public health intervention for gambling, and yet there is little evidence to support the variety of messages that are in widespread use. This paper thematically analyzed the perspectives of 21 participants – including academics, regulators and treatment providers – regarding the design characteristics of safer-gambling messages with the goal to improve on those already being used. The focus groups were semi-structured and discussed exemplar messages based on five areas of previous gambling research: teaching safer gambling practices, correcting gambling misperceptions, boosting conscious decision making, norm-based messages, and emotional messages. Five themes were supported by the three focus groups, including that messages: may be insufficient to change behavior; should respect the diversity amongst gamblers; should not contribute to gambling stigma; should provide norm-based information thoughtfully; and should trigger only positive and not negative emotions. These findings can be useful in developing messages that are based on themes endorsed by experts as being relevant to the design of effective safer-gambling messages. Generating a pool of messages that are evidence based is likely to improve on current messages, thus serving as a useful public health tool for promoting safer-gambling involvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术界、监管机构和治疗提供者如何认为可以改善更安全的赌博信息?
安全赌博信息是一种常见的赌博公共卫生干预措施,但几乎没有证据支持广泛使用的各种信息。本文以主题分析了21位参与者的观点——包括学者、监管机构和治疗提供者——关于安全赌博信息的设计特征,目的是改进那些已经在使用的信息。焦点小组是半结构化的,并讨论了基于先前赌博研究的五个领域的范例信息:教授更安全的赌博实践,纠正赌博误解,促进有意识的决策,基于规范的信息和情感信息。三个焦点小组支持五个主题,包括信息:可能不足以改变行为;应尊重赌客的多样性;不应助长赌博的污名;应周到地提供基于规范的信息;应该只会引发积极而不是消极的情绪。这些发现可以用于开发基于专家认可的主题的信息,这些主题与设计有效的安全赌博信息有关。产生一组基于证据的信息可能会改进现有的信息,从而成为一种有用的公共卫生工具,促进更安全的赌博参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Can ‘justified disapproval’ be separated from addiction stigma? An empirical focus is required Do older adults drink alcohol whilst taking alcohol-interactive medication? Prevalence and ten-year mortality risk: findings from the UK Whitehall II cohort study Ambulatory assessment to advance the science of nondrug reward in addiction and recovery Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilization for commercial and Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid use disorder Does the lived experience of gambling accord with quantitative self-report scores of gambling-related harm?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1