Laser in endodontics: a scoping review

Sofia Drouri, Meriem Mouhibi, S. Dhaimy, M. Jabri, H. Merini
{"title":"Laser in endodontics: a scoping review","authors":"Sofia Drouri, Meriem Mouhibi, S. Dhaimy, M. Jabri, H. Merini","doi":"10.5455/ijmrcr.172-1674644074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of LASER (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) in endodontics and its effectiveness compared to conventional techniques and methods currently used. Material and method: The electronic databases PubMed, Science direct and Cochrane library, were searched from 2010-2022 to identify clinical trials and in vitro/in vivo trials evaluating the clinical application of laser in endodontics. The search terms utilized various combinations as follows: endodontics or root canal therapy or dentin or dental pulp and laser. Articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria, data were extracted and methodological quality was assessed. Results: Twenty articles were deemed eligible and included in the review. Of these twenty studies, eleven were in vitro trials and nine were in vivo trials. An assessment of the risk of bias of the included studies was used to classify the studies into three categories: low, medium, and high risk of bias. To evaluate the results of these articles, we established the following analysis criteria: root canal disinfection, direct pulp capping, post endodontic pain and opening of dentinal tubuli. The results of the studies included in this review showed that laser appears to improve root canal disinfection, removal of debris and smear layer, adaptation of filling materials to dentin by increasing the penetration of root canal sealants into the dentinal tubuli, improved prognosis of direct pulp capping treatment as well as decreased postoperative endodontic pain. Conclusion: Although laser appears to improve the quality of endodontic treatment, the heterogeneity in the methodology among the eligible studies did not allow a meta-analysis to be performed for clinical decisions with greater certainty of evidence. Further in vivo studies with standardization of laser parameters are needed to validate its utility as an innovative technology in modern endodontics.","PeriodicalId":13694,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmrcr.172-1674644074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of LASER (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) in endodontics and its effectiveness compared to conventional techniques and methods currently used. Material and method: The electronic databases PubMed, Science direct and Cochrane library, were searched from 2010-2022 to identify clinical trials and in vitro/in vivo trials evaluating the clinical application of laser in endodontics. The search terms utilized various combinations as follows: endodontics or root canal therapy or dentin or dental pulp and laser. Articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria, data were extracted and methodological quality was assessed. Results: Twenty articles were deemed eligible and included in the review. Of these twenty studies, eleven were in vitro trials and nine were in vivo trials. An assessment of the risk of bias of the included studies was used to classify the studies into three categories: low, medium, and high risk of bias. To evaluate the results of these articles, we established the following analysis criteria: root canal disinfection, direct pulp capping, post endodontic pain and opening of dentinal tubuli. The results of the studies included in this review showed that laser appears to improve root canal disinfection, removal of debris and smear layer, adaptation of filling materials to dentin by increasing the penetration of root canal sealants into the dentinal tubuli, improved prognosis of direct pulp capping treatment as well as decreased postoperative endodontic pain. Conclusion: Although laser appears to improve the quality of endodontic treatment, the heterogeneity in the methodology among the eligible studies did not allow a meta-analysis to be performed for clinical decisions with greater certainty of evidence. Further in vivo studies with standardization of laser parameters are needed to validate its utility as an innovative technology in modern endodontics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光在牙髓学中的应用综述
目的:评价激光(LASER)技术在牙髓治疗中的应用效果,并与目前常用的传统技术和方法进行比较。材料和方法:检索PubMed、Science direct和Cochrane图书馆2010-2022年的电子数据库,确定评估激光在牙髓学临床应用的临床试验和体外/体内试验。搜索词使用不同的组合如下:牙髓学或根管治疗或牙本质或牙髓和激光。根据纳入标准选择文章,提取数据并评估方法学质量。结果:20篇文章被认为符合条件并纳入综述。在这20项研究中,11项是体外试验,9项是体内试验。对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行评估,将研究分为三类:低、中、高偏倚风险。为了评价这些文章的结果,我们建立了以下分析标准:根管消毒、直接盖髓、根管后疼痛和牙本质小管开放。本综述的研究结果表明,激光似乎可以改善根管消毒,清除碎片和涂抹层,通过增加根管密封剂对牙本质的渗透,使填充材料适应牙本质,改善直接盖髓治疗的预后,减少术后根管疼痛。结论:虽然激光似乎提高了根管治疗的质量,但在符合条件的研究中,方法的异质性不允许进行荟萃分析,以获得更确定的证据。激光参数的标准化需要进一步的体内研究来验证其作为现代牙髓学创新技术的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Vaccine for HIV Medicinal Common Seed-Acorus Calamus A Rare Case of Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor Post-Traumatic Feelings of Vulnerability, Psychological Disability, And Connection to Others in Victims of the 2016 Seka Train Derailment in Cameroon Multiple Polycystic Organs in A Middle Age Female: A Rare Case of More Than Ten Years Without Surgical Intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1