The Islamic State's Pattern of Sexual Violence: Ideology and Institutions, Policies and Practices

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Global Security Studies Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1093/jogss/ogaa038
M. Revkin, E. Wood
{"title":"The Islamic State's Pattern of Sexual Violence: Ideology and Institutions, Policies and Practices","authors":"M. Revkin, E. Wood","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaa038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Islamic State, which controlled significant territory in Iraq and Syria between 2014 and 2017, engaged in a wide repertoire of violence against civilians living in these areas. Despite extensive media coverage and scholarly attention, the determinants of this pattern of violence remain poorly understood. We argue that, contrary to a widespread assumption that the Islamic State wielded violence indiscriminately, it systematically targeted different social groups with distinct forms of violence, including sexual violence. Our theory focuses on ideology, suggesting it is a necessary element of explanations of patterns of violence on the part of many armed actors. Ideologies, to varying extent, prescribe organizational policies that order or authorize particular forms of violence against specific social groups and institutions that regulate the conditions under which they occur. We find support for our theory in the case of sexual violence by the Islamic State by triangulating between several types of qualitative data: official documents; social media data generated by individuals in or near Islamic State-controlled areas; interviews with Syrians and Iraqis who have knowledge of the organization’s policies including victims of violence and former Islamic State combatants; and secondary sources including local Arabic-language newspapers. Consistent with our theory, we find that the organization adopted ideologically motivated policies that authorized certain forms of sexual violence, including sexual slavery and child marriage. Forms of violence that violated organizational policies but were nonetheless tolerated by many commanders also occurred and we find evidence of two such practices: gang rape of Yazidi women and forced marriage of Sunni Muslim women.","PeriodicalId":44399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Security Studies","volume":"218 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Security Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogaa038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The Islamic State, which controlled significant territory in Iraq and Syria between 2014 and 2017, engaged in a wide repertoire of violence against civilians living in these areas. Despite extensive media coverage and scholarly attention, the determinants of this pattern of violence remain poorly understood. We argue that, contrary to a widespread assumption that the Islamic State wielded violence indiscriminately, it systematically targeted different social groups with distinct forms of violence, including sexual violence. Our theory focuses on ideology, suggesting it is a necessary element of explanations of patterns of violence on the part of many armed actors. Ideologies, to varying extent, prescribe organizational policies that order or authorize particular forms of violence against specific social groups and institutions that regulate the conditions under which they occur. We find support for our theory in the case of sexual violence by the Islamic State by triangulating between several types of qualitative data: official documents; social media data generated by individuals in or near Islamic State-controlled areas; interviews with Syrians and Iraqis who have knowledge of the organization’s policies including victims of violence and former Islamic State combatants; and secondary sources including local Arabic-language newspapers. Consistent with our theory, we find that the organization adopted ideologically motivated policies that authorized certain forms of sexual violence, including sexual slavery and child marriage. Forms of violence that violated organizational policies but were nonetheless tolerated by many commanders also occurred and we find evidence of two such practices: gang rape of Yazidi women and forced marriage of Sunni Muslim women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《伊斯兰国的性暴力模式:意识形态与制度、政策与实践
伊斯兰国在2014年至2017年期间控制了伊拉克和叙利亚的大片领土,对生活在这些地区的平民实施了广泛的暴力。尽管有广泛的媒体报道和学术关注,这种暴力模式的决定因素仍然知之甚少。我们认为,与普遍认为伊斯兰国不分青红皂白地使用暴力的假设相反,它系统地针对不同的社会群体,使用不同形式的暴力,包括性暴力。我们的理论侧重于意识形态,表明它是解释许多武装行动者的暴力模式的必要因素。意识形态在不同程度上规定了组织政策,命令或授权针对特定社会群体和规范暴力发生条件的机构的特定形式的暴力。在伊斯兰国性暴力的案例中,我们通过对几种定性数据进行三角分析,找到了对我们理论的支持:官方文件;个人在伊斯兰控制地区或其附近产生的社交媒体数据;采访了解该组织政策的叙利亚人和伊拉克人,包括暴力受害者和前伊斯兰国战斗人员;以及包括当地阿拉伯语报纸在内的二手资料。与我们的理论一致,我们发现该组织采取了意识形态驱动的政策,授权某些形式的性暴力,包括性奴役和童婚。违反组织政策但仍得到许多指挥官容忍的各种形式的暴力也发生了,我们发现了两种这种做法的证据:对雅兹迪妇女的轮奸和对逊尼派穆斯林妇女的强迫婚姻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Security Studies
Journal of Global Security Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Geopolitics and Genocide: Patron Interests, Client Crises, and Realpolitik Digital Rights and the State of Exception. Internet Shutdowns from the Perspective of Just Securitization Theory The Political Economy of Australian Militarism: On the Emergent Military–Industrial–Academic Complex Can Insurgents Capture Aid through Credit Claiming? Evidence from Afghanistan Out of the Shadows: Ukraine and the Shock of Non-Hybrid War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1