Prediction of Household Food Security Status Using Ensemble Learning Models

Mersha Nigus, H.L Shashirekh
{"title":"Prediction of Household Food Security Status Using Ensemble Learning Models","authors":"Mersha Nigus, H.L Shashirekh","doi":"10.2174/2210327913666221209143445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThis research uses the Ethiopian HICE survey dataset. Predicting food insecurity is critical in presenting the household's situation to the appropriate agencies that take preventative and intervention measures.\n\n\n\nThis research paper's primary goal is to predict households' food security status using ensemble learning models.\n\n\n\nWe use five base classifiers and a voting strategy for ensemble classification to enhance the performance of different base classifiers. Backward feature elimination and hard and soft voting-based ensemble learning are used to evaluate household food security. The training set for the basic classifiers is composed of the features that have been selected. Each ML classifier makes its prediction about the class label with the help of an ensemble learning method. For making decisions, hard voting uses a simple majority, whereas soft vote employs a weighted probability. To determine the final prediction. Ethiopian household income, consumption, and expenditure dataset are used to test the proposed ensemble learning approach. \nThe backward feature elimination approach improved the model's performance by removing irrelevant and redundant features. Random forest, gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, K-nearest Neighbor, and Extra Tree classifiers were used to predict the family's level of food security. Finally, the authors compare the accuracy of ensemble and base classifiers.\n\n\n\nThe experiment result shows that the RF classifier surpasses the other base and ensemble classifiers and scored 99.98% accuracy. Because a Random forest classifier is an ensemble learning classifier that uses several decision trees, the final prediction is computed based on the majority vote of the several trees. The comparison result of hard and soft voting reveals that soft voting outperforms hard voting before and after feature selection with accuracies of 99.79% and 99.77%, respectively.\n\n\n\nBased on the result obtained, ensemble learning plays a significant role in predicting household food security status and implementing hard and soft voting. The RF classifier surpasses the other base and ensemble classifiers with an accuracy of 99.98%. From ensemble methods, soft voting surpasses hard voting with an accuracy score of 99.79%.\n","PeriodicalId":37686,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2210327913666221209143445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research uses the Ethiopian HICE survey dataset. Predicting food insecurity is critical in presenting the household's situation to the appropriate agencies that take preventative and intervention measures. This research paper's primary goal is to predict households' food security status using ensemble learning models. We use five base classifiers and a voting strategy for ensemble classification to enhance the performance of different base classifiers. Backward feature elimination and hard and soft voting-based ensemble learning are used to evaluate household food security. The training set for the basic classifiers is composed of the features that have been selected. Each ML classifier makes its prediction about the class label with the help of an ensemble learning method. For making decisions, hard voting uses a simple majority, whereas soft vote employs a weighted probability. To determine the final prediction. Ethiopian household income, consumption, and expenditure dataset are used to test the proposed ensemble learning approach. The backward feature elimination approach improved the model's performance by removing irrelevant and redundant features. Random forest, gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, K-nearest Neighbor, and Extra Tree classifiers were used to predict the family's level of food security. Finally, the authors compare the accuracy of ensemble and base classifiers. The experiment result shows that the RF classifier surpasses the other base and ensemble classifiers and scored 99.98% accuracy. Because a Random forest classifier is an ensemble learning classifier that uses several decision trees, the final prediction is computed based on the majority vote of the several trees. The comparison result of hard and soft voting reveals that soft voting outperforms hard voting before and after feature selection with accuracies of 99.79% and 99.77%, respectively. Based on the result obtained, ensemble learning plays a significant role in predicting household food security status and implementing hard and soft voting. The RF classifier surpasses the other base and ensemble classifiers with an accuracy of 99.98%. From ensemble methods, soft voting surpasses hard voting with an accuracy score of 99.79%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于集成学习模型的家庭粮食安全状况预测
本研究使用埃塞俄比亚HICE调查数据集。预测粮食不安全状况对于向采取预防和干预措施的适当机构介绍家庭状况至关重要。本文的主要目标是利用集成学习模型预测家庭的粮食安全状况。我们使用5个基分类器和投票策略来提高不同基分类器的性能。采用后向特征消去和基于软硬投票的集成学习对家庭食品安全进行评价。基本分类器的训练集由已选择的特征组成。每个ML分类器在集成学习方法的帮助下对类标签进行预测。在做决定时,硬投票采用简单多数,而软投票采用加权概率。以确定最终的预测。埃塞俄比亚家庭收入、消费和支出数据集用于测试所提出的集成学习方法。后向特征消除方法通过去除不相关和冗余的特征来提高模型的性能。使用随机森林、梯度增强、多层感知器、k近邻和额外树分类器来预测家庭的粮食安全水平。最后,比较了集成分类器和基分类器的准确率。实验结果表明,射频分类器优于其他基分类器和集成分类器,准确率达到99.98%。因为随机森林分类器是一个集成学习分类器,它使用了几棵决策树,所以最终的预测是基于几棵树的多数投票来计算的。硬投票和软投票的对比结果表明,软投票在特征选择前后的准确率分别为99.79%和99.77%,优于硬投票。综上所述,集成学习在预测家庭粮食安全状况和实施软硬投票方面发挥了重要作用。RF分类器以99.98%的准确率超过了其他基础和集成分类器。从集合方法来看,软投票优于硬投票,准确率为99.79%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control
International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: International Journal of Sensors, Wireless Communications and Control publishes timely research articles, full-length/ mini reviews and communications on these three strongly related areas, with emphasis on networked control systems whose sensors are interconnected via wireless communication networks. The emergence of high speed wireless network technologies allows a cluster of devices to be linked together economically to form a distributed system. Wireless communication is playing an increasingly important role in such distributed systems. Transmitting sensor measurements and control commands over wireless links allows rapid deployment, flexible installation, fully mobile operation and prevents the cable wear and tear problem in industrial automation, healthcare and environmental assessment. Wireless networked systems has raised and continues to raise fundamental challenges in the fields of science, engineering and industrial applications, hence, more new modelling techniques, problem formulations and solutions are required.
期刊最新文献
Non-orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Channel Estimation for Mobile & PLC-VLC Based Broadband Communication System Optimizing Financial Decision Support Systems with Machine LearningDriven Recommendations An Energy-Balance Clustering Routing Protocol for Intra-Body Wireless Nanosensor Networks Unveiling Data Fairness Functional Requirements in Big Data Analytics Through Data Mapping and Classification Analysis An Intelligent Transport System Using Vehicular Network for Smart Cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1