Analysis of the quality of mathematical examination items for high school ‘A’ in Bekasi

Y. F. Siregar, R. Setiadi
{"title":"Analysis of the quality of mathematical examination items for high school ‘A’ in Bekasi","authors":"Y. F. Siregar, R. Setiadi","doi":"10.1063/5.0061171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parameters of educational success can be measured by conducting an educational assessment in the form of an evaluation. In the process of evaluation, especially learning outcomes evaluation, teachers generally use the examination system. The purposes of this research are to analyze the quality of Mathematics exam questions made by teachers and predict the Mathematics ability of ‘A’ High School students in Bekasi. The data used are the exam questions, the answer of exam questions and students’ answers to the Mathematics final exam with 148 subjects of Grade 10 students of ‘A’ High School in Bekasi. The method used to achieve these purposes is Item Response Theory with 4 parameters. The result of this study obtained show that from 30 exam questions made by the school, there are 19 items with good quality to measure the ability of students. The result of the analysis based on all items, it was found that from 148 students who took the Mathematics Examination at the ‘A’ High School in Bekasi, there are 25 students with low level of ability, 97 students with medium level of ability, and 26 students with high level of ability. The result of the analysis based on good quality items, it was found that from 148 students who took the Mathematics Examination at the ‘A’ High School in Bekasi, there are 21 students with low level of ability, 103 students with medium level of ability, and 24 students with high level of ability.","PeriodicalId":20561,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES 2020 (ISCPMS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The parameters of educational success can be measured by conducting an educational assessment in the form of an evaluation. In the process of evaluation, especially learning outcomes evaluation, teachers generally use the examination system. The purposes of this research are to analyze the quality of Mathematics exam questions made by teachers and predict the Mathematics ability of ‘A’ High School students in Bekasi. The data used are the exam questions, the answer of exam questions and students’ answers to the Mathematics final exam with 148 subjects of Grade 10 students of ‘A’ High School in Bekasi. The method used to achieve these purposes is Item Response Theory with 4 parameters. The result of this study obtained show that from 30 exam questions made by the school, there are 19 items with good quality to measure the ability of students. The result of the analysis based on all items, it was found that from 148 students who took the Mathematics Examination at the ‘A’ High School in Bekasi, there are 25 students with low level of ability, 97 students with medium level of ability, and 26 students with high level of ability. The result of the analysis based on good quality items, it was found that from 148 students who took the Mathematics Examination at the ‘A’ High School in Bekasi, there are 21 students with low level of ability, 103 students with medium level of ability, and 24 students with high level of ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
别加西A级高中数学试题质量分析
教育成功的参数可以通过以评估的形式进行教育评估来衡量。在评价过程中,特别是学习成果评价中,教师一般采用考试制度。本研究的目的是分析教师的数学考题质量,预测别加西A级高中学生的数学能力。使用的数据是Bekasi ' A '高中10年级148个科目的考试题目、试题答案和学生对数学期末考试的答案。达到这些目的的方法是带有4个参数的项目反应理论。本研究的结果显示,在学校制作的30道试题中,有19道试题质量较好,可以用来衡量学生的能力。对所有项目进行综合分析的结果显示,在Bekasi A高中参加数学考试的148名学生中,能力水平低的学生有25人,能力水平中等的学生有97人,能力水平高的学生有26人。以优质项目为基础进行分析的结果显示,在Bekasi A高中参加数学考试的148名学生中,能力水平低的学生有21人,能力水平中等的学生有103人,能力水平高的学生有24人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Singular Integral Operators, Quantitative Flatness, and Boundary Problems Mirzakhani’s Curve Counting and Geodesic Currents The conception of national nuclear emergency preparedness system from the state defense perspective Computer security regulation for nuclear installation: A suggestion Optimal reinsurance combination of quota-share and stop-loss reinsurance based on conditional-tail-expectation (CTE) optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1