How Smart Should a Service Robot Be?

IF 9.8 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Service Research Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1177/10946705221107704
J. Schepers, D. Belanche, L. Casaló, C. Flavián
{"title":"How Smart Should a Service Robot Be?","authors":"J. Schepers, D. Belanche, L. Casaló, C. Flavián","doi":"10.1177/10946705221107704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Service robots are taking over the frontline. They can possess three types of artificial intelligence (AI): mechanical, thinking, and feeling AI. Although these intelligences determine how service robots can help customers, not much is known about how customers respond to robots of different intelligence. This paper addresses this gap, builds on the appraisal theory of emotions, and employs three online experiments and one field study to demonstrate that customers have different emotional responses to the three types of AI. Particularly, the influence of AI on positive emotions becomes stronger as the AI type becomes more sophisticated. That is, feeling AI relates more strongly to positive emotions than mechanical AI. Also, feeling AI and thinking AI increase spending and loyalty intention through customers’ positive emotions. We also identify important contingency effects of service tiers: mechanical AI is more suitable for low-cost firms, whereas feeling AI mainly benefits full-service providers. Remarkably, none of the three intelligences are directly related to negative emotions; perceived robot autonomy is an important mediator in these relationships. The findings yield concrete managerial guidance as to how smart a service robot should be by pinpointing the right type of AI given the market segment of the service provider.","PeriodicalId":48358,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"565 - 582"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221107704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Service robots are taking over the frontline. They can possess three types of artificial intelligence (AI): mechanical, thinking, and feeling AI. Although these intelligences determine how service robots can help customers, not much is known about how customers respond to robots of different intelligence. This paper addresses this gap, builds on the appraisal theory of emotions, and employs three online experiments and one field study to demonstrate that customers have different emotional responses to the three types of AI. Particularly, the influence of AI on positive emotions becomes stronger as the AI type becomes more sophisticated. That is, feeling AI relates more strongly to positive emotions than mechanical AI. Also, feeling AI and thinking AI increase spending and loyalty intention through customers’ positive emotions. We also identify important contingency effects of service tiers: mechanical AI is more suitable for low-cost firms, whereas feeling AI mainly benefits full-service providers. Remarkably, none of the three intelligences are directly related to negative emotions; perceived robot autonomy is an important mediator in these relationships. The findings yield concrete managerial guidance as to how smart a service robot should be by pinpointing the right type of AI given the market segment of the service provider.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
服务机器人应该有多智能?
服务机器人正在接管前线。他们可以拥有三种类型的人工智能(AI):机械、思考和感觉AI。虽然这些智能决定了服务机器人如何帮助客户,但客户对不同智能机器人的反应却知之甚少。本文解决了这一差距,建立在情绪评估理论的基础上,并采用三个在线实验和一个实地研究来证明客户对三种类型的人工智能有不同的情绪反应。特别是,随着AI类型的复杂化,AI对积极情绪的影响也会越来越强。也就是说,与机械AI相比,感觉AI与积极情绪的联系更为紧密。感受人工智能和思考人工智能通过顾客的积极情绪增加消费和忠诚意愿。我们还发现了服务层次的重要偶然性效应:机械人工智能更适合低成本公司,而感觉人工智能主要有利于全方位服务提供商。值得注意的是,这三种智力都与负面情绪没有直接关系;感知机器人自主性是这些关系的重要中介。研究结果为服务机器人的智能程度提供了具体的管理指导,根据服务提供商的细分市场,确定正确的人工智能类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Research (JSR) is recognized as the foremost service research journal globally. It is an indispensable resource for staying updated on the latest advancements in service research. With its accessible and applicable approach, JSR equips readers with the essential knowledge and strategies needed to navigate an increasingly service-oriented economy. Brimming with contributions from esteemed service professionals and scholars, JSR presents a wealth of articles that offer invaluable insights from academia and industry alike.
期刊最新文献
Humans Vs. Service Robots as Social Actors in Persuasion Settings Responding to Cyberattacks: The Persuasiveness of Claiming Victimhood Unethical Consumer Behavior Following Artificial Intelligence Agent Encounters: The Differential Effect of AI Agent Roles and its Boundary Conditions A Framework of Services-as-Practices The AR Cloud: Navigating Metaverse Augmentation Technologies for Enhanced Co-Creation of Value Within Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1